Jump to content

Righthander Chaz Roe


weams

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 203
  • Created
  • Last Reply

He's still on the team, and Tommy Hunter is not.

The reason he's still on the team is that he will be cheap and controllable for several seasons, while Tommy Hunter is expensive and not controllable after the season.

But when you're trying to win now, there should be other considerations in building a team besides whether a player is cheap and controllable. Like whether you can actually help the team win now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's still on the team, and Tommy Hunter is not.

The reason he's still on the team is that he will be cheap and controllable for several seasons, while Tommy Hunter is expensive and not controllable after the season.

But when you're trying to win now, there should be other considerations in building a team besides whether a player is cheap and controllable. Like whether you can actually help the team win now.

It isn't as easy as "get the guy that helps you win now." That dude is not going to be cheap.

As we all know, it's a balancing act. You take a few players for cheap, that perform decently but by no means at the peak of what's available in the league (your expensive options). You take the money you saved and try to use it to maximally enhance production of other spots on the team.

...Or you are the GM of the Yankees or Dodgers and your job is super-easy because you just buy the best production at every position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's still on the team, and Tommy Hunter is not.

The reason he's still on the team is that he will be cheap and controllable for several seasons, while Tommy Hunter is expensive and not controllable after the season.

But when you're trying to win now, there should be other considerations in building a team besides whether a player is cheap and controllable. Like whether you can actually help the team win now.

Are you making the argument that Tommy Hunter can help the O's win now and Chaz Roe cannot? There's not much discernible difference between the two. Roe has the lower ERA (2.88 to 3.63) and better K rate (8.9 to 6.4); Hunter had the better WHIP (1.16 to 1.34) and walk rate (2.2 to 3.4).

Either one would likely be equally effective as a middle reliever for the rest of the year. So why not keep the one that is cheaper and under control for several more years? The Orioles' postseason hopes aren't going to hinge on whether they have Tommy Hunter or Chaz Roe eating up low-leverage innings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I might option Roe and recall Givens. Seems like Roe needs to do some work and Givens is a hot hand.

I am 90% sure that Roe is out of options, otherwise this move would have been made a week ago. The problem is he has shown enough to make him worth keeping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roe is out of options.

But Buck is handcuffed because Duquette made an idiotic move to call up Lake and option Givens for Garcia. The smart move is to have an extra bullpen arm that you can use (Givens) and not a redundant piece like Lake if you're going to require Garcia on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roe is out of options.

But Buck is handcuffed because Duquette made an idiotic move to call up Lake and option Givens for Garcia. The smart move is to have an extra bullpen arm that you can use (Givens) and not a redundant piece like Lake if you're going to require Garcia on the roster.

He might be trying to justify the Hunter trade.

Not that he should have to...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Realistically I think Adley as the leadoff guy is the best lineup for us but if he has trouble batting leadoff in half the games because he can't get his catcher's gear off fast enough then I get it.   Cowser has continued to be incredibly patient, and if Adley can't be our leadoff guy then Cowser is probably our next best option.  Of course Cowser also hits a lot of bombs, so it'd be interesting if he goes on another heater.   If Cowser gets off the schneid then Cowser leadoff and Gunnar at 2 could be incredibly potent.  I don't think Cowser is actually playing that badly, he's just been running into some bad luck.  And he's starting to wake up a little bit anyway.
    • Agreed, appreciate the stats. Gunnar isn't a leadoff hitter - he's a prototypical #3 hitter or cleanup hitter. Hyde writes poor lineups, and Gunnar hitting leadoff has been one of the consistent problems with the offense this season. Gunnar hitting mostly solo shots is both a consequence and reflection of this offense's flaws - the O's have too many low-OBP hitters in the lineup (hitting in less-than-optimal spots for the most part) and are too reliant on solo homers to generate runs. At least Hyde has started hitting Westburg leadoff against LHP, which is progress, but Hyde is way too stubborn and too slow to make the correct adjustments. He's very similar to Buck Showalter in that respect.  Anyway, I look forward to Hyde waking up and moving Gunnar down to #3/#4 against RHP.  
    • While the return on the Tettleton trade wasn't ideal, 1: I don't think you can really expect a 30 year old catcher to put up a career year and then follow it up with another one, and 2: we had Chris Hoiles who played quite well for us following Tettleton's departure.  If we had forward thinking GMs we probably would split them at C and give them DH/1B/OF games on their non catching days, which is what Detroit did with Tettleton to prolong his career after 1992.  (He was basically the same hitter from 1993-1995 but he stopped catching with regularity so his WAR was much lower.)   The Davis trade was so completely undefensible on every level, not the least of which because we already had a player who was at least as good as Davis was on the team, but he didn't fit the stereotypical batting profile of a 1B.  At least today teams wouldn't be so quick to dismiss a 10 HR first baseman if he's got an OBP of .400.
    • The Glenn Davis trade was so bad it overshadowed another really bad trade in team history. The Orioles traded Mickey Tettleton that same offseason for Jeff Robinson in part because Tettleton had an off year in 1990 with a .223 batting average and a .381 slugging percentage. Except Tettleton drew 116 walks making his OBP .376 and his OPS+ was 116. Jeff Robinson was coming off a 5.96 ERA in 145 innings pitched. I have no idea what the team was thinking with this trade. Robinson did manage to lower his ERA in 1991 to 5.18 his only Orioles season. There's no way this trade is made today in the age of analytics. Tettleton meanwhile put up 171 home runs and an .859 OPS for the remainder of his career. 😬 Just a bad trade that doesn't get talked about enough thanks to Glenn Davis.
    • Your best POWER hitter should get the most at bats with men on base. Gunnar is third on the team in OB%, but far and away the leader in SLG%. Heck, right now he has the highest SLG% in the AL. Yet he has the fewest ABs with men on base of any of our regulars. Batting him leadoff gives Gunnar more opportunities to hit HRs and score runs, but fewer opportunities to drive in runs. 75% of Henderson's HRs have been hit with the base empty. Compare that to Ohtani (62%), Tucker (60%), Ozuna (57%), Naylor (50%), or Judge (46%). 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...