Jump to content

Orioles Better Make Davis an Offer!


Old#5fan

Recommended Posts

You should include a source if you're going to make such a strong rhetorical statement.

For example, Forbes says that 122 players in 2013 had TUE's, and 119 of those were for ADHD medications (roughly 14% of MLB players).

http://www.forbes.com/sites/maurybrown/2013/11/30/from-add-to-hypogonadism-how-119-mlb-players-were-allowed-to-use-banned-substances/

I would take them on a case-by-case basis, personally. In Davis's case, he demonstrated specifically that he isn't a MLB-player without his TUE (sub .200 BA, really?).

You realize this is ridiculous right?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Uninformed opinion alert: Chris Davis struggled in TEX when he had a TUE and hit 53 HR when he didn't. So Adderall had nothing to do with his performance.

Not uninformed, just skeptical. And again, sources are needed.

There was a Jeff Passan tweet that said sourced "Sources," that was the seminal idea for all the following articles which posited that he didn't have an exemption in 2013.

Here, however, is a source that somewhat reasonably assumed that when Davis said he didn't have an exemption "this year" (2014), he meant that he did have one last year. These are some of the only words from Davis himself.

http://www.thefix.com/content/baltimores-chris-davis-suspended-adderall-use

In addition and more importantly, Mark Townsend noted that Davis failed two tests in two years, and while he accepts (from Passan) that he didn't have a TUE in 2013, that he was still using Adderall anyway, leading to his 2014 sususpension.

http://http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-big-league-stew/chris-davis-receives-adderall-exemption-following-suspension-040505429.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matusz was on 105.7 the other day ...Thursday I believe and he said he's here for one more year...He referred to the super two thing and a 4th year of arb. I'm certain he knows his status.

The Orioles would have to offer him arbitration. Will they do it when he's looking at 3.5-4M? I wouldn't.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should include a source if you're going to make such a strong rhetorical statement.

For example, Forbes says that 122 players in 2013 had TUE's, and 119 of those were for ADHD medications (roughly 14% of MLB players).

http://www.forbes.com/sites/maurybrown/2013/11/30/from-add-to-hypogonadism-how-119-mlb-players-were-allowed-to-use-banned-substances/

I would take them on a case-by-case basis, personally. In Davis's case, he demonstrated specifically that he isn't a MLB-player without his TUE (sub .200 BA, really?).

Even with his awful 2014 season he was close to a two win player. So to say he isn't a major league player is not true.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not uninformed, just skeptical. And again, sources are needed.

There was a Jeff Passan tweet that said sourced "Sources," that was the seminal idea for all the following articles which posited that he didn't have an exemption in 2013.

Here, however, is a source that somewhat reasonably assumed that when Davis said he didn't have an exemption "this year" (2014), he meant that he did have one last year. These are some of the only words from Davis himself.

http://www.thefix.com/content/baltimores-chris-davis-suspended-adderall-use

In addition and more importantly, Mark Townsend noted that Davis failed two tests in two years, and while he accepts (from Passan) that he didn't have a TUE in 2013, that he was still using Adderall anyway, leading to his 2014 sususpension.

http://http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-big-league-stew/chris-davis-receives-adderall-exemption-following-suspension-040505429.html

This is a very specious argument. One source does not quote Davis as saying he had a TUE in 2013, it says he didn't, provides no evidence for this, but quotes Davis as saying he had one "in the past". The other source can't be accessed. But all of this is baloney because we know Davis had a TUE in TEX and he didn't put up very impressive numbers. People who know something about the condition know it has more to do with helping a person focus under stress. Davis wasn't stressed on 2013 and by all credible accounts wasn't using Adderall. He was stressed in 2014 for a variety of reasons and did use it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I want is for Crush, and all the other pending free agents, to blow it up for themselves the next two months and carry this team to a daggone championship. Then we can worry about saying goodbye to everybody!!

Exactly. Is it too much to ask that they play with reckless abandon for 12 weeks. Have some fun out there and win. Let's put off the off season as long as possible. TIME FOR MAGIC, not arbirtation

Jones looks like he did in April and May, Machadao is making people forget Trout, Hardy jusst needs to bear down and find himself, he's a stud and he will turn on the jets and sprint the rest of this marathon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. Is it too much to ask that they play with reckless abandon for 12 weeks. Have some fun out there and win. Let's put off the off season as long as possible. TIME FOR MAGIC, not arbirtation

Jones looks like he did in April and May, Machadao is making people forget Trout, Hardy jusst needs to bear down and find himself, he's a stud and he will turn on the jets and sprint the rest of this marathon

Yes, no one remembers the best player in the game anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, no one remembers the best player in the game anymore.

Machado is every bit the player the Trout is, especially because he plays a much more difficuly defensive position. Manny is also batting out of order. Look what he's done leading off? He's not gettting pitches to hit and he's still be the best offensive threat on the team.

Im not willing to concede Manny takes a back seat to anyone. MANNY UP!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Machado is every bit the player the Trout is, especially because he plays a much more difficuly defensive position. Manny is also batting out of order. Look what he's done leading off? He's not gettting pitches to hit and he's still be the best offensive threat on the team.

Im not willing to concede Manny takes a back seat to anyone. MANNY UP!!!!!!

Manny has full matured into an absolutely great player this year. I have loved watching that transformation and love that he is an Oriole.

Having said that, he still isn't Mike Trout.

Also, did I miss 3rd base being accepted as a much more difficult position than CF?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Machado is every bit the player the Trout is, especially because he plays a much more difficuly defensive position. Manny is also batting out of order. Look what he's done leading off? He's not gettting pitches to hit and he's still be the best offensive threat on the team.

Im not willing to concede Manny takes a back seat to anyone. MANNY UP!!!!!!

Batted out of order?

If you are one of those that fallaciously thinks that hitting third would make a difference, keep in mind that Trout has logged many more games hitting first and second then he has third.

Being behind Trout isn't a mark of shame, it is just a reality, a reality that ever other player in the game has to deal with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Johnson isn't on the 40 man roster so a promotion would involve some juggling there. Also, while his .920 OPS looks impressive please keep in mind that Ryan McKenna's career OPS at Norfolk was .915. I liked the energy Johnson brought to his game during Spring Training, reminded me a lot of Gunnar's attitude. While I'm not sure he'd be any more valuable on paper than McKenna was, I'm certainly willing to give chances to guys that play the game balls to the wall like he did. 
    • I doubt there is anything in the Union contract preventing MLB from using an electronic strike zone. So long as no umpires are let go or reduced in pay they would have no cause for a grievance or work stoppage. The issue for them would simply be the blow to their ego as they would lose influence over the games that they're used to having. Boo hoo.  IMO the critical reason for MLB to establish an electronic strike zone would be to eliminate the chances of a gambling scandal involving a home plate umpire going rogue in order to change the outcome of the game. I doubt a Black Sox like conspiracy could occur these days simply because players make so much money that it wouldn't make sense for a group of them to throw a game. But a single corrupt umpire calling balls and strikes in a big game could have an enormous influence on the final score. Ask the '97 Braves. Robo-umps would do away with such a possibility forever. 
    • I didn't want to say it, but since your brought it up.....I agree.   I have been involved in the fitness industry as both a person who has worked out with heavy weights for years, a company level as I used to own a supplement company, and a social media level as I know many of the social influencers involved in the fitness industry.   I can tell you that squatting that amount and even further dead lifting that amount, even for a fervent power lifter is very very rare.  Let alone for someone who weighs 180 pounds like JH, who is worth many millions,  and what makes it even more unlikely is there is no way IN H E L L that the O's brass is going to let him try and DL 700 pounds.  We are talking snap city when it comes to the back DLing that amount.  Just no way he could even do that based on his build, which is ok but nothing great.  Plus even IF he could, the Os would never let him.    End of story.   Here is one of the stronger guys I know on you tube who is around JH's weight, actually 10 pounds more, and it took years and years of training to DL 600 pounds for him.   Yet somehow a guy with JHs build is Deadlifting 700 at the age of 20?  Righttttttt lol.      
    • I'm looking at the Rays record over the past decade and I'm a bit confused over your definition of "have not won much". However, my argument is simple - teams that don't invest in payroll don't win championships in baseball. Over the past 21 years (I was going to do 20, but added the extra to include Florida's win in 2003), the average payroll position relative to the league of the eventual WS champ was 9th (see below) Year WS Champ OD Payroll rank 2003 FLA 25 2004 BOS 2 2005 CWS 13 2006 STL 11 2007 BOS 2 2008 PHI 12 2009 NYY 1 2010 SF 10 2011 STL 11 2012 SF 8 2013 BOS 4 2014 SF 7 2015 KC 16 2016 CHC 14 2017 HOU 18 2018 BOS 1 2019 WAS 7 2020 LAD 2 2021 ATL 13 2022 HOU 11 2023 TEX 9   Only three of these teams had payrolls in the bottom half of league: Florida in 2003 had by far the lowest payroll, at 25th. Their payroll climbed to as high as 18th over the next couple of years, but they couldn't maintain their success and haven't made the playoffs since, outside of the COVID season. KC in 2015 had the 16th lowest payroll, barely below the median payroll for the year. They haven't been back to the playoffs since. Houston in 2017 had the 18th lowest payroll. This was their big breakthrough year after their tanking/rebuild, and they haven't been lower than 11th since, and as high as 4th.   The trend is obvious. After the Marlins' miracle run in 2003, no team has won the WS with a payroll lower than 18th, and that team (Houston) is an obvious outlier as they were in the basically the same spot as the O's now (on the upswing from a full tear-down). While KC and Florida both had years where everything came together perfectly, they were unable to sustain their momentum. The O's were 23rd in payroll on Opening Day, and the current roster is good enough to win a championship, but history suggests they'll go the way of Florida and Kansas City if Rubenstein isn't willing to invest in the payroll. Consistently letting the talent drain out of your organization because you aren't willing to pay them won't lead to multiple championships and it won't keep fans engaged.
    • Correlation vs. Causation: The study states that there is a correlation between 1RM (one-rep max) squat and performance metrics like the 10-yard split and 40-yard dash times. However, correlation does not imply causation. Just because these variables are correlated does not mean that one causes the other.   
    • I think he's claimed and right away.
    • His Dad is a big boy and obvious lifter.  Some guys are naturally good squatters.  That’s an impressive number for Holliday, but who knows exactly how legit the actual squat is.  You can find high school kids at nearly every high school about his size with similar squat numbers.  Granted, they will be some of the strongest pound for pound kids, but it’s not a crazy number. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...