Jump to content

What was the turning point of the season for the O's?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

For me it may have been August 1st to 3rd when Mike Wright went on the DL with a calf injury and Tyler Wilson went down with an oblique injury.

The O's were one game back of the wild card on August 1st.

Its not that I believe that these two pitchers would have won a bunch of games. Its that Buck trusted both pitchers enough to give them starts in the majors to off load the starting staff and possibly rest the staff enough to keep them from self destructing.

With both players on the DL Buck was reluctant to call up Chris Jones or any one from AAA to carry some of the starting work load. This ultimately caught with the pitching staff IMO.

It might be odd that two rookies could have made such a difference in the season, but their absence may have made everything unravel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply
For me it's pretty clearly the Minnesota series. The last 3 games were gut-wrenching.

This. Getting swept by a team that was down and (seemingly) out was a killer. I'm not sure if things would change if we would have split that series...seems like this team just doesn't have it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This. Getting swept by a team that was down and (seemingly) out was a killer. I'm not sure if things would change if we would have split that series...seems like this team just doesn't have it.

We had just swept the A's and then Hank smacked the walk-off homer to earn a split against the Mets. Looked like WE were the ones ready to ride adrenaline back into the playoff hunt. Then the Twins series debacle and it all fell apart from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The off season of inactivity was the turning point.

Bingo. Also, the SP rotation as a whole turning back into pumpkins.

The offense has been hot and cold all season, so it's not that. If our rotation had been able to keep us in games over the last month, we would still be around .500. The Minnesota series is when we started falling apart though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me it may have been August 1st to 3rd when Mike Wright went on the DL with a calf injury and Tyler Wilson went down with an oblique injury.

The O's were one game back of the wild card on August 1st.

Its not that I believe that these two pitchers would have won a bunch of games. Its that Buck trusted both pitchers enough to give them starts in the majors to off load the starting staff and possibly rest the staff enough to keep them from self destructing.

With both players on the DL Buck was reluctant to call up Chris Jones or any one from AAA to carry some of the starting work load. This ultimately caught with the pitching staff IMO.

It might be odd that two rookies could have made such a difference in the season, but their absence may have made everything unravel.

I don't see it. The O's went 10-7 in the first 17 days of August, and only lost two in a row once. They only allowed 3.76 runs/game in those 17 games. I don't think we would have seen much if any of Wright and Wilson in that stretch, except maybe in the bullpen.

I think the turning point was clearly the Twins series. I went into that series with every hope that we'd take 3 of 4, or even sweep it. The Twins were playing lousy baseball at the time. Losing all four to them, with blown saves from both O'Day and Britton, was a huge deflator. Our starters have a 6.77 ERA since the beginning of the Twins series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see it. The O's went 10-7 in the first 17 days of August, and only lost two in a row once. They only allowed 3.76 runs/game in those 17 games. I don't think we would have seen much if any of Wright and Wilson in that stretch, except maybe in the bullpen.

I think the turning point was clearly the Twins series. I went into that series with every hope that we'd take 3 of 4, or even sweep it. The Twins were playing lousy baseball at the time. Losing all four to them, with blown saves from both O'Day and Britton, was a huge deflator. Our starters have a 6.77 ERA since the beginning of the Twins series.

I agree, I was there on of those nights, and that game was winnable and should have been, dang it,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...