Jump to content

Remember, kids, we could NOT have had Fister AND Latos for less than Gallardo


FanSince88

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • 1 month later...
I think either the DH needs to go away, or implement it in the NL, IMO

During it this way, is just dumb. IMO

I think the odds are that we will see the DH in the NHL within 5 years, maybe sooner than that.

It's already in the NHL. Tom Wilson is a pretty good one for the Caps. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fister is having a great season, but I think the OP is using the benefit of hindsight to prop up his theory. Remember, Fister was reportedly asking for 2 / 22 from the Orioles (reported by Roch), he struggled terrifically last year with the Nats and was demoted to the bullpen, his fastball velocity was 86 at the start of last year (86...) and he only average 5 2/3 innings per start last year.

Those are some SERIOUS warning signs that would have caused any team to be cautious about overpaying on a one year deal.

And I think its really unwise to discount the idea of him not wanting to pitch in Camden Yard and/or the AL East. His current season (8 - 3, 3.21 ERA) will likely net him a large multi-year deal in the off-season if he can maintain it. Last year OPACY was the 3rd best hitters park in the Majors and Minute Maid was the 22nd best. There were 33% less runs scored at Minute Maid Park than OPACY - that is a huge difference. Also Houston's opponents in the AL West scored 10% fewer runs than the Orioles opponents in the AL East last year. If you're looking to have a bounce-back season and capture a big free agent contract, any sane business person would choose Houston over Baltimore every day of the week and twice on Sunday - even if the contract was a couple of million less this year.

And speaking of the contract, Fister is currently projected to get 188 IPs this year, which would trigger incentives taking the contract to 11M (he will get $12M if he gets to 200 IP). Presumably, the O's would have had to offer a contract with incentives that outbid that number by a significant margin to get Fister to Baltimore. At the time, I'm not sure any of us would have been to happy with a $9M guaranteed contract with performance accelerators to $13 - $14MM which probably would have been the starting point for convincing Fister to pass on the offer from Houston. I know that if I were Fister, I'd have still passed on a $2M better deal with the O's for the opportunity to pitch in Houston and improve my chances of a big FA contract in 2017, so it's not even clear to me that a $14M contract was going to get it done.

Anyway I think the OPs original premise is fundamentally wrong. To get either pitcher here, we probably have to overpay. Maybe $4M to get Latos and $14M to get Fister for one season. That's less than the total contract we gave Gallardo, but its significantly more than we're paying on an annual basis.

So it's unclear that we could have had them at all since no sane pitcher trying to land a multi-year contract through a 1 year bounce-back contract would choose Baltimore if they have any other option and even if we could have gotten them, they probably would have cost as much as 50% more on an annualized basis than Gallardo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And no pick.

Just thought I'd mention that once again, as Fister pitched nearly 6 innings of 3 hit ball against us today. Yes, yes, he gave up two homers, but they were solo shots. a rather Chen-like outing if I may say so. Not to mention Latos who is doing very well.

How awesome would this rotation have been:

Tillman

Gausman

Fister

Latos

Wilson/Wright/Ubaldo

It could have been all ours for just over $10 mil AND kept the 14th pick, AND only a one year committment. Instead we're stuck with gimpy Yovani for another year and a half. :puke:

Lets see O's in first place. Just because you think that the DD screwed the pooch

signing Gallardo instead of Fister and Latos. What you seem to forget is its a two

way street. Maybe Fister and Latos didnt want to sign with the O's. Latos has been

sent out. IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets see O's in first place. Just because you think that the DD screwed the pooch

signing Gallardo instead of Fister and Latos. What you seem to forget is its a two

way street. Maybe Fister and Latos didnt want to sign with the O's. Latos has been

sent out. IMO

Fair enough, and if I'm proven wrong, so much the better.

I'm very amused that someone (probably not you, Tx Oriole, but a certain other individual who has decided to start flaming me on this board all of a sudden, as if I'm the worst cancer to ever post on here, as if I haven't been an occasional poster for 11 years with a positive overall rating) decided to neg-rep me today, over a month after I started this thread, and after 4 pages of replies. Looks like a character assassination is underway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough, and if I'm proven wrong, so much the better.

I'm very amused that someone (probably not you, Tx Oriole, but a certain other individual who has decided to start flaming me on this board all of a sudden, as if I'm the worst cancer to ever post on here, as if I haven't been an occasional poster for 11 years with a positive overall rating) decided to neg-rep me today, over a month after I started this thread, and after 4 pages of replies. Looks like a character assassination is underway.

Isn't it also possible you got negative rep for posting stuff that's inaccurate without it being a conspiracy against you?

You claim that we could have had Latos and Fister for only 10M. That's only true if Fister pitches less than 100 IPs (which is only likely to happen if he's injured or cut). To be accurate, you could have said 10 - 15M (to account for Fister's performance accelerators) but that would have invalidated your whole premise, so you just posted the stuff that fit your theory, without being concerned with accuracy. Lots of people (including me) have gotten neg rep for posting things that were wrong and easily researched. Sometimes the simplest answer is the right one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough, and if I'm proven wrong, so much the better.

I'm very amused that someone (probably not you, Tx Oriole, but a certain other individual who has decided to start flaming me on this board all of a sudden, as if I'm the worst cancer to ever post on here, as if I haven't been an occasional poster for 11 years with a positive overall rating) decided to neg-rep me today, over a month after I started this thread, and after 4 pages of replies. Looks like a character assassination is underway.

sadViolin.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I agree, he’s Aaron Judge in the infield seemingly.
    • I wouldn't try Westburg in CF as his primary position (as a super utility,  sure).  He’s been so stable in the dirt.  Holliday is a maybe.   I'm more confident in Mayo's defense than others.  Not that he'll be a better defender, but that he'll be a net positive.  Austin Riley-esque.  Plan B would be 1B IMO because of IF experience. Tough to really say for 2024 though with how Mateo and Westburg are playing (and RHHs).  Urias is the low man but don't want Mayo sitting that much. Probably takes an injury for Mayo to get a shot before rosters expand.  For Holliday and Mayo both:  our IF is really good.  Players have key strengths even if not great all-around like Gunnar/Adley.  Westburg is trending toward being plus all-around.  
    • That 3-4 record is largely because of Kimbrel. I’m not a big believer in the 1-run luck theory, especially now that we have the BS ghost runner. 
    • I have a question for you and I don’t mean for this to come across as accusatory (unless it is true and I don’t know if it is). Are you an Oriole fan or more of a “fan”/detractor of Jackson Holliday? I ask because you seem to be very focused on the struggles of this one 20 year old player. However, last week, we had a tremendous pitching performance by our entire starting staff and to my knowledge (I don’t recall a single comment from you about that). Maybe you did and I missed it? Which is very possible. Or maybe you just weren’t on here and we’re busy with other stuff? I get it we all have lives. I bring this up because I have noticed that you have very little to say/contribute regarding all of the positives regarding this team who has the second most wins in the Majors. And I was curious as to why that is? (No judgment. Just a curiosity.)
    • Saw some clips of him last year and was interesting. 
    • 2024 is the year of the pitcher for the O's.  DeLeon is a dude and "chalk" for guesses.  Forret can pop.  Povich isn't on most (any?) top 100, but he's been fringy for the past year+.  He's trending toward a top 50 type. He won't be on lists, but Braxton Bragg has a 14+ k/9 and a 1.69 bb/9.  Maybe a BP nugget next year depending on how he’s doing it. Willem is doing things as a C.  Beavers has been fringy and has been strong so far.  Both probably need a bit more. FCL is too soon to guess... but Almeyda and Liranzo are interesting.  Still a top 5 system I think.  I don't know other organizations as well, but (a good shot at) 3 top 15 guys carries a lot of weight.  Even "losing" Cowser/Ortiz and maybe HK, they are back-filled by good pitchers who weren't really on national radars.
    • In your opinion what has made Jackson Holliday the number rated prospect in all of MLB? I ask because if you believe in that valuation/talent profile/projection, that is not a player at age 20 who you say he’s only average here so he must go there (where who knows how he’ll be, but oh well on to the next).  Mookie Betts is the absolute rarity in his ability to move all over the baseball field and excel. How many other guys have done that and can realistically do that? I would bet very few. I’m not sure if that is the wisest call to make that the standard for anyone, let alone your most prized minor league asset.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...