Jump to content

Tom Verducci On Ubaldo Jimenez: 'It's A Sunk Cost


PressBoxOnline

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If he can't control his command in the rotation, he certainly can't control it in the bullpen.
He can sometimes control his command, at least for a few innings. He's going to start Tuesday night. If he only lasts 1-4 innings, then try him in the pen. He's pitched from the pen before (in 2014) and actually wasn't too bad. Better the pen than eating up his huge contract.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cost of UJ will pale in comparison to Davis IMO. He is totally lost at the plate at the present time. Cut the swing down, go off field for a bit. He is K'ing at an alarming rate against some unremarkable pitchers.

He gets in these funks.

Even in his good years.

One day he will come up to the plate and suddenly be locked in.

Just have to hope the hot stretches outnumber the cold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He can sometimes control his command, at least for a few innings. He's going to start Tuesday night. If he only lasts 1-4 innings, then try him in the pen. He's pitched from the pen before (in 2014) and actually wasn't too bad. Better the pen than eating up his huge contract.

I'm not sure you can rely on him coming into a game and keeping it close. His ERA by inning is all over the place.

1st: 4.09

2nd: 2.53

3rd: 8.10

4th: 4.50

5th: 12.00

6th: 19.64

7th: 0.00

8th: 0.00

1-3: 4.83

4-6: 9.93

7-9: 0.00

I worry about his control coming in out of the bullpen, personally. Especially if it's *ever* a high leverage situation for him...or a close game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure you can rely on him coming into a game and keeping it close. His ERA by inning is all over the place.

1st: 4.09

2nd: 2.53

3rd: 8.10

4th: 4.50

5th: 12.00

6th: 19.64

7th: 0.00

8th: 0.00

1-3: 4.83

4-6: 9.93

7-9: 0.00

I worry about his control coming in out of the bullpen, personally. Especially if it's *ever* a high leverage situation for him...or a close game.

So you'd rather just cut him and eat up the rest of his contract? I'd try him in the pen first. That's what they did with Bud Norris in 2015. Tried him in the pen. As it turned out, Bud pitching from the pen didn't work so they released him. However he was in his walk year and what they had to eat was a lot smaller. With Ubaldo, try him in low-leverage situations at first. Let him get more used to the idea of pitching in relief. Better that than eating 1 1/2 years of his contract, which is a lot bigger than Norris's was. After all, we have some players to sign, mainly Mark Trumbo, possibly Matt Wieters, and especially Manny.

Last year, the O's carried far too much dead money into the off-season after they DFA'd so many players. Yes, some they never should have signed. Perhaps they never should have signed Ubaldo, but that's now water over the dam.

And who knows -- maybe Ubaldo will pitch a no-hitter tonight. That would be great! :clap:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom Verducci says he doesn't see things getting better with Ubaldo Jimenez, and at some point, the Orioles may need to just move on.

https://www.pressboxonline.com/2016/06/06/tom-verducci-on-orioles-and-ubaldo-jimenez-its-a-sunk-cost

I feel for Jimenez. I know he is not pitching well. And for some reason it seems

like he just can't get it together. Maybe he could pitch out of the BP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at the game. Believe me, Ubaldo was trying, he was doing his best. But the fastball command was simply eluding him. Sometimes he'd get it together for a few pitches, and get a clutch strikeout. But on the other hand, it says something when the only run scored off of him was from a bases-loaded walk.

I truly believe that eating the rest of his large contract is not a feasible idea for a team that wants to perhaps extend Trumbo, Wieters, and especially Manny. So Ubaldo might have to be a rather expensive long reliever. Who knows, maybe during this time doing long relief will help him finally get it together so that he can rejoin the rotation. Or he might turn into a top long reliever. Who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He showed a little something last time. If he can do it again, he could save his job. If he does it enough, he could stay in the rotation for quite some time. It's not like we have great alternatives. Verducci doesn't see things getting better but they got better after a terrible 2014. He's the same guy who put up a 2.81 ERA in the first half last year. I can't stand watching him pitch but he could put it together again. If he does, I'd trade him in the offseason which is something I advocated after last year. Not saying there was a team out there willing to bite.

He's had 2 good halfs in 6 years. Not a good ratio. He's just not a good pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • But again, nothing you say here changes anything. This team is going to be built from within. They are not going to try to build any other way…and they are right about that. This doesn’t mean they don’t need to spend but again, those guys will supplement the roster. And don’t think they won’t talk about how they added guys at the deadline for 2025. That they are “like free agent signings”.
    • It was the holder, not the kicker.  Jackson may not be perfect, but he's far from the problem this year. He's got a fumbling issue that may at some point cost this team a game or two, but there is no doubt he's playing some good football right now.
    • Yeah I'm surprised that Cleveland has been this bad. They were good last season. 
    • Gunnar also signed a one year contract.
    • The when is really two questions.  One is when do the O's stop being handicapped by the risk-averse mindset that's governed their behavior since 2018, and the second is when does a 74 year-old billionaire tire of being told he has to wait a little longer because Jackson Holliday needs to further refine his new toe-tap?  Oh, and we also need to nail down a position for Coby Mayo, and so on.  No question?  I think the questions are numerous and many of them pretty important, and because they're so important, I think we'll start seeing a change in approach beginning this offseason.  I certainly hope so. Nothing I've said disputes the need for internal development or diminishes the role our current core of young players - some of whom haven't exactly made a seamless transition - will need to play for sustained success.  Nor is it a call for stupid FA spending.  It very much is an argument that time needs to be thought of differently now that two very successful regular seasons are behind the O's and the huge impediment of Angelos ownership is no longer a factor.
    • If he wants to join Hyde’s staff in some capacity, I’d be fine with that. Or are you actually talking about him being on the team as a player?
    • So why would you have sought payment if you were owner as you previously stated?  Since you are not known for being litigious and all? Also as I am sure you’re already aware the media exclusivity rights in Vegas are already shared by 6 major league teams. Which clearly was not the situation in DC as the territory was expressly the territory of the Baltimore Orioles.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...