Jump to content

Updates on Hunter Harvey


Norfolk orioles

Recommended Posts

o

Harvey is still #1, while there have been a few changes overall in the top 30.

Dylan Bundy, Joey Rickard, and Tyler Wilson are no longer considered "prospects."

Pat Connaughton and Ryan Meisinger debut at #29 and #30, respectively.

Here is the latest:

11) Hunter Harvey

12) Jomar Reyes

13) Chance Cisco

14) Trey Mancini

15) Demetrius Jerome Stewart

16) Ryan Mountcastle

17) Christopher Ulysses Lee

18) Tanner Scott

19) Jason Garcia

10) Christian Walker

11) Jonah Heim

12) Gray Fenter

13) David Hess

14) Ofelky Peralta

15) Lazaro Leyva

16) Parker Bridwell

17) Oliver Drake

18) J.D. Gunkel

19) Mike Yastrzemski

20) Ryan McKenna

21) Jason Heinrich

22) Garrett Cleavinger

23) Brian Gonzalez

24) Alex Murphy

25) Josh Hart

26) Branden Kline

27) Adrian Marin

28) John Alan Means

29) Pat Connaughton

30) Ryan Meisinger

http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2016?list=bal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

Harvey is still #1, while there have been a few changes overall in the top 30.

Dylan Bundy, Joey Rickard, and Tyler Wilson are no longer considered "prospects."

Pat Connaughton and Ryan Meisinger debut at #29 and #30, respectively.

Here is the latest:

11) Hunter Harvey

12) Jomar Reyes

13) Chance Cisco

14) Trey Mancini

15) Demetrius Jerome Stewart

16) Ryan Mountcastle

I don't know how anyone could be ranking Stewart higher than Mountcastle at this point. Mountcastle is 3 years younger, and OPSing almost 100 points higher in the same league, and hot as a firecracker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong. Garcia was the Rule 5. No waiver claims. Chris Lee was traded for international slots.

Btw, while I criticize Duq a lot, that trade for Lee may turn out to be borderline brilliant - especially considering the O's likely wouldn't have used those int'l slots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Btw, while I criticize Duq a lot, that trade for Lee may turn out to be borderline brilliant - especially considering the O's likely wouldn't have used those int'l slots.

Absolutely. I would rather he spend the money but if not might as well pick up a long shot and see if he comes in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I mean Tanner Scott at least has a Major League track record. How much do you think Scott will really cost? Also, we have more position players and prospects that we could ever use. I understand maybe not wanting Scott, but I don't understand the logic of not wanting surrender any prospects (even some good ones). We almost have to at some point. Otherwise, you have 25 year old top level prospects like Kjerstad, who is in his prime now and killing it at AAA but has no place on the Big League roster. Stowers is even older and has contributed relatively nothing to the Orioles and is now age 26.
    • Way to avoid the question.  If the O's were in rebuild mode and had Gray Rod in the exact position he is now, what kind of prospect package would you want?  Fans here are notorious for not wanting to give up any good prospects for other team's best players but then want the world for their own less than perfect players.  When Gausman was about to be traded here (way less an impressive pitcher than Gray Rod is now), posters here were convinced that the O's would get 3 top 100 prospects for him.  The O's got none 
    • McDermott has a WHIP of almost 1.5 and has walked 41 batters in 64 and 2/3 innings. I'm not sure how that plays at the Big League level or how anyone could have a lot of confidence that those numbers translate into the kind of shut down backend reliever that we need.
    • I would be not surprised at all if McDermott deloads after the all star break and comes up to use as a reliever a la do hall the last few years. He’s basically tanner Scott without having to give up prospects to get. 
    • I don't want anything for Grayson. We are trying to win and add, not subtract from areas of strength. We can add a a 2/3ish starter for less than Holliday and Kjerstad. We have plenty of players/prospects that we can trade that other teams want. After all, we have the best farm system in the game. Just because the player(s) is/are not the #1 prospect in the sport, it doesn't make him/them spare parts.
    • I'm surprised the O's haven't tried McDermott as a reliever yet.  Some posters have said the O's need 3 relievers.  There is no way the O's are trading for 3 relievers.  They might trade for 1, find one in the minors and claim one off the waiver wire. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...