Jump to content

Pedro back. (Will he opt out?)


oriolesacox

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Not only that, but it gives him a play to play the outfield in order to show teams he can play there or not. I imagine this deal will have some kind of opt out date. Saying all this, I'm really surprised Alvarez could not find a major league deal out there. The Rockies just lost their first baseman so I'm surprised that wasn't a good fit. I know Pedro is not very good defensively, but I didn't think he was that bad that he would end up back on a minor league deal to play the outfield.

I guess he agreed a day too soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 385
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I don't really see the downside to this move. If Alvarez can prove to be a decent outfielder, and I admit it's probably a longshot, but if he does, it makes him insurance for Kim and Smith. Also, if Trumbo or Davis get hurt, this gives the O's an experienced DH who can fill in against righties. 

The fact that the Orioles get a two-month look at a guy to play a new position with limited risk is a win-win situation. I'm still surprised it has come to this for Pedro, but perhaps he believes this is his best plan longterm to regain value. Afterall, Seth Smith and Hyun Soo Kim are not exactly known for their gloves so if he can show that he can play effectively out there, his value will jump for teams.

As for pitchers with Norfolk, they are evaluated on how they are throwing the ball, not the results because outfielders didn't make plays that they should. It might not help the win-loss record for Norfolk if he's terrible out there, but the truth of the matter is the Orioles don't care about that. They care about whether they can develop players who can help them win at the major league level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

I don't really see the downside to this move. If Alvarez can prove to be a decent outfielder, and I admit it's probably a longshot, but if he does, it makes him insurance for Kim and Smith. Also, if Trumbo or Davis get hurt, this gives the O's an experienced DH who can fill in against righties. 

The fact that the Orioles get a two-month look at a guy to play a new position with limited risk is a win-win situation. I'm still surprised it has come to this for Pedro, but perhaps he believes this is his best plan longterm to regain value. Afterall, Seth Smith and Hyun Soo Kim are not exactly known for their gloves so if he can show that he can play effectively out there, his value will jump for teams.

As for pitchers with Norfolk, they are evaluated on how they are throwing the ball, not the results because outfielders didn't make plays that they should. It might not help the win-loss record for Norfolk if he's terrible out there, but the truth of the matter is the Orioles don't care about that. They care about whether they can develop players who can help them win at the major league level.

Norfolk, in turn will probably love having a bonafide Major Leaguer that they can market for a month or two, bring a few extra folks to the park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is anything more than a hand to a former player and a relationship building tool with an agent (in other words: getting him a chance to get into playing shape and show what he can do in the OF for the rest of the league) then I'm really perplexed. Maybe Alvarez will be a serviceable outfielder, but even on the off-chance he is, how does he answer any questions for this club? You still have Kim and Smith as platoon bats from the left-side. 

If we're this desperate for outfielders, I'm still unsure why the Orioles don't just bite the bullet and put Davis out in RF. Surely, he's a better defensive option there than Trumbo, Mancini or Alvarez. I get the robbing Peter to pay Paul argument about downgrading the defense at first, but if we're going to try and cram as many sluggers into the roster as possible, wouldn't it make more sense to have a passable RF and passable 1B on defense than an absolutely terrible defensive RF and a good defensive 1B? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I don't really see the downside to this move. If Alvarez can prove to be a decent outfielder, and I admit it's probably a longshot, but if he does, it makes him insurance for Kim and Smith. Also, if Trumbo or Davis get hurt, this gives the O's an experienced DH who can fill in against righties. 

The fact that the Orioles get a two-month look at a guy to play a new position with limited risk is a win-win situation. I'm still surprised it has come to this for Pedro, but perhaps he believes this is his best plan longterm to regain value. Afterall, Seth Smith and Hyun Soo Kim are not exactly known for their gloves so if he can show that he can play effectively out there, his value will jump for teams.

As for pitchers with Norfolk, they are evaluated on how they are throwing the ball, not the results because outfielders didn't make plays that they should. It might not help the win-loss record for Norfolk if he's terrible out there, but the truth of the matter is the Orioles don't care about that. They care about whether they can develop players who can help them win at the major league level.

Competition is always good.  This is a low risk move that could result in us getting an asset out of it via trade.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was Buck's idea.

https://www.pressboxonline.com/2017/03/13/orioles-manager-buck-showalters-suggestion-led-to-pedro-alvarez-conversion

Quote

Last September, Orioles manager Buck Showalter suggested to Pedro Alvarez, who received less playing time toward the end of last season as a designated hitter, he could improve his chances of being a viable major leaguer if he learned how to play the outfield.

Can I please never again hear that Buck is a defense first guy when it comes to the outfield?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

This was Buck's idea.

https://www.pressboxonline.com/2017/03/13/orioles-manager-buck-showalters-suggestion-led-to-pedro-alvarez-conversion

Can I please never again hear that Buck is a defense first guy when it comes to the outfield?

I mean, the way it's reported, it sounds more like Buck was giving Pedro career advice. And he's not wrong. He wasn't endorsing him AS an outfielder, by any means. Just recommending giving it a go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FlipTheBird said:

I mean, the way it's reported, it sounds more like Buck was giving Pedro career advice. And he's not wrong. He wasn't endorsing him AS an outfielder, by any means. Just recommending giving it a go.

Did you read the whole thing?

Quote

"I'm going to be surprised if he can't do it. [He's] pretty athletic," Showalter said. "Kind of fits his skill set, too. He's got a plus arm, and he's going to work hard at it.

It certainly sounds like Buck thinks he will make a viable outfielder, at 30.  Despite not being able to play first or third with sufficient proficiently.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Did you read the whole thing?

It certainly sounds like Buck thinks he will make a viable outfielder, at 30.  Despite not being able to play first or third with sufficient proficiently.

 

 

 

Is optimism a bad thing? Buck isn't promising playing time, he's just hoping the guy can do it - and why shouldn't he? Should Pedro just give up and not play baseball anymore?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, FlipTheBird said:

Is optimism a bad thing? Buck isn't promising playing time, he's just hoping the guy can do it - and why shouldn't he? Should Pedro just give up and not play baseball anymore?

I don't think it's optimism.  I think Buck thinks Pedro could play outfield for him.  I think there are a lot of teams Pedro couldn't play outfield for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...