Jump to content

MLB Host Flores: "Orioles Need a Complete Rebuild..."


MemorialStadKid

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

Miguel Tejada 

Who else was in on Tejada?

I don't think anyone was.

From what I remember the O's are the only team that went into that offseason with the intention of spending big.

Heck Vlad had to wait weeks after the O's offer to find someone else that he could play for.

So while the O's did step up and pay for Tejada I don't think you could say they won a bidding war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply
On 8/19/2017 at 7:00 AM, Es4M11 said:

This 100%.

Angelos/DD can't go and pay Chris Davis and Mark Trumbo $36m AAV and then say "we can't afford Manny". If the O's really can't afford a market value contract for Manny, then shame on them for grossly mismanaging their resources.

If money is cited as the reason for not re-signing Machado, I might just suspend my Orioles fandom until new ownership is in place. I can understand if it is not Manny's desire to remain in Baltimore, but if the Orioles low-ball Manny and then cry poverty when he signs elsewhere, I'm done supporting the franchise for a while.

If the determination is made that Manny will not re-sign by his own choice, then he needs to be traded this offseason.

Depends on the money he askes for. If he wants 300 million for 7 to 10 years is just too much. The FO also has to address the pitching needs. It'd be so easy if Pete hadn't resigned Chris even at Bucks urging. I hope the FO can resign Manny but they have to be smart about it. I can understand your frustration. Sorry and I don't mean to offend but I am a fan of the team not just one player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tx Oriole said:

Depends on the money he askes for. If he wants 300 million for 7 to 10 years is just too much. The FO also has to address the pitching needs. It'd be so easy if Pete hadn't resigned Chris even at Bucks urging. I hope the FO can resign Manny but they have to be smart about it. I can understand your frustration. Sorry and I don't mean to offend but I am a fan of the team not just one player. 

I'd do 10/300 on a player like Manny everyday of the week and twice on Sunday before I'd give 7/161 to a Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It's different when it's an incumbent player.     I don't rule out that Manny will stay.     

Got any examples?  Only one I can think of is them outspending the Nats on O'Day and I have to wonder if it that wasn't mostly because it was the Nationals they were bidding against.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Got any examples?  Only one I can think of is them outspending the Nats on O'Day and I have to wonder if it that wasn't mostly because it was the Nationals they were bidding against.

The way you are defining bidding war, when was the last time they lost one?    Mussina?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'd do 10/300 on a player like Manny everyday of the week and twice on Sunday before I'd give 7/161 to a Davis.

I understand Can. I didn't want CD resigned at all. Waste of money. I knew Chris couldn't fulfill the contract but didn't expect him to fall so quickly. Thought that he would be good for 4 years. Oh well. As for Manny I want him resigned but gosh 300 million. If Manny likes Baltimore wonder if he'd make a little lower deal? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tx Oriole said:

I understand Can. I didn't want CD resigned at all. Waste of money. I knew Chris couldn't fulfill the contract but didn't expect him to fall so quickly. Thought that he would be good for 4 years. Oh well. As for Manny I want him resigned but gosh 300 million. If Manny likes Baltimore wonder if he'd make a little lower deal? 

 

300M doesn't seem that large to me when I look at all the money MLB has been bringing in.  The MLBAM sale to Disney alone was for more than 2.5B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It's different when it's an incumbent player.     I don't rule out that Manny will stay.     

I hope you are right Frobby. Maybe the FO will offer Manny a contract extension this offseason. They sure should do that. At least try. If you were in his place would you accept a 3 year extension or hold out for FA? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tx Oriole said:

I hope you are right Frobby. Maybe the FO will offer Manny a contract extension this offseason. They sure should do that. At least try. If you were in his place would you accept a 3 year extension or hold out for FA? 

You didn't ask me but I'd much rather hit the FA market at 26.  That is how you get a 10 year deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...