Jump to content

Maryland at Illinois


murph

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ChuckS said:

Considering we will be bringing most if not all pieces back last year I think it's fine, with an eye to make a deeper run next year. Our best players are three sophomores and two freshmen and we have a two top 50 recruits coming in. 

No one had in the top 25 coming into the season.  We were considered among the next wave of teams 26-50th best in the country.  I think that's where we are still at. 

What I am saying is the Maryland Basketball team should have, year in and year out, a higher goal than simply making the tournament. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
56 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

What I am saying is the Maryland Basketball team should have, year in and year out, a higher goal than simply making the tournament. 

But what is that based on?  Our history as a program?  The wealth of high school talent in the DC/Baltimore region that we've never recruited to its potential?

I've been watching Maryland Basketball for 25 years and I can count more seasons where we have been bubble tournament teams than solidly in the top 25.  

Other than some of the teams in the late 90's and early 2000's we've never really been a powerhouse.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

But what is that based on?  Our history as a program?  The wealth of high school talent in the DC/Baltimore region that we've never recruited to its potential?

I've been watching Maryland Basketball for 25 years and I can count more seasons where we have been bubble tournament teams than solidly in the top 25.  

Other than some of the teams in the late 90's and early 2000's we've never really been a powerhouse.  

Yes.

That combined with the size of the school, the league, ect, ect.

I feel like Maryland should be a perennial top 25 school that should make not infrequent runs to the sweet 16 and occasionally beyond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think making the tournament should be an acceptable goal.

Absolutely.  This is a program whose goal each year should be to be a Top 20-24 seed, with some years where it all comes together and they're a bit above that, and some years where they're a bit worse.  We shouldn't be hoping in December that this team pulls it together enough to make the tournament year after year.  

And of course, even if we get there (and I do think we will), there's very little optimism about making any sort of run.  Turgeon has yet to show that he can outcoach any sort of talent deficiency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ChuckS said:

Considering we will be bringing most if not all pieces back last year I think it's fine, with an eye to make a deeper run next year. Our best players are three sophomores and two freshmen and we have a two top 50 recruits coming in. 

 

Yeah - and then Jackson and Fernando will probably leave early, Cekovsky is gone, Obi isn't playing much and seems likely to be gone anyway, so we'll be left with Bender as our lone returning frontcourt player.  That will be the excuse next year, with Sticks Smith having to start games as a freshman and us having no frontcourt depth.  The beat goes on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think making the tournament should be an acceptable goal.

And that is the underlying issue here. There is no reason that just making the tourney should be a goal. A realistic goal for this program every season should be to get to the Sweet 16 and go from there. Turgeon jumped around like a school girl when he got a 6th seed last year. If you get that excited over a 6th seed, then you have very low expectations for your team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, glenn__davis said:

Yeah - and then Jackson and Fernando will probably leave early, Cekovsky is gone, Obi isn't playing much and seems likely to be gone anyway, so we'll be left with Bender as our lone returning frontcourt player.  That will be the excuse next year, with Sticks Smith having to start games as a freshman and us having no frontcourt depth.  The beat goes on.

Yep, there is always an excuse for the Turgeon supporters on why this team continues to be an after thought. With the facilities, talent level in the area, and league, there is no reason this program should not be a power house, or at least a second tier powerhouse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Yep, there is always an excuse for the Turgeon supporters on why this team continues to be an after thought. With the facilities, talent level in the area, and league, there is no reason this program should not be a power house, or at least a second tier powerhouse. 

I'm not a Turgeon supporter at all.  I just think there is some unwarranted entitlement going on here.  Maryland has never been (consistently) a top ten or top 20 program, so to just expect that because we are a big state school in a power conference is a little unrealistic. 

I would like to have a coach that could take us to the next level as well, but Turgeon hasn't fared any worse than Gary Williams from 2006 to 2011 and the recruiting has certainly been better.  We are getting top 50 recruits on a consistent basis where as we may have had one or two of them (total) during that time frame with Williams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, glenn__davis said:

Yeah - and then Jackson and Fernando will probably leave early, Cekovsky is gone, Obi isn't playing much and seems likely to be gone anyway, so we'll be left with Bender as our lone returning frontcourt player.  That will be the excuse next year, with Sticks Smith having to start games as a freshman and us having no frontcourt depth.  The beat goes on.

I don't think Jackson is going anywhere unless he plays to the level that we end up with a quality season. Fernando is raw and probably needs another year.  That's not something you can assume. Ceko and Obi leaving are non-factors. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ChuckS said:

I'm not a Turgeon supporter at all.  I just think there is some unwarranted entitlement going on here.  Maryland has never been (consistently) a top ten or top 20 program, so to just expect that because we are a big state school in a power conference is a little unrealistic. 

I would like to have a coach that could take us to the next level as well, but Turgeon hasn't fared any worse than Gary Williams from 2006 to 2011 and the recruiting has certainly been better.  We are getting top 50 recruits on a consistent basis where as we may have had one or two of them (total) during that time frame with Williams. 

They were a Top 20 program in the 70's and early 80's, and for most of the 90's and early 2000's.  For about a 3-decade stretch there, the only time they weren't a consistent Top 20 level program was during the Bob Wade sanction years.  The AP released an article a few years back that rated every college program based solely on the amount of AP votes they'd received during the time of the poll.  MD was 17th.  This is a program with great facilities, great local talent, and historical success.  It should not be a program that year after year is hoping to make the NCAA tournament.  High expectations for this program are warranted.

8 hours ago, ChuckS said:

I don't think Jackson is going anywhere unless he plays to the level that we end up with a quality season. Fernando is raw and probably needs another year.  That's not something you can assume. Ceko and Obi leaving are non-factors. 

Obviously you can't assume it, but as a coach in this era you do have to anticipate it.  If I put money on it right now, I'd expect both to be gone though.  If Jackson doesn't leave it will be because he played poorly, which is something this team can't afford anyway.

Ceko leaving is certainly not a non-factor.  He provides depth and minutes in the frontcourt.  Obi is not much of a factor this year, but could be more important next year if Fernando and Jackson do indeed leave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, glenn__davis said:

They were a Top 20 program in the 70's and early 80's, and for most of the 90's and early 2000's.  For about a 3-decade stretch there, the only time they weren't a consistent Top 20 level program was during the Bob Wade sanction years.  The AP released an article a few years back that rated every college program based solely on the amount of AP votes they'd received during the time of the poll.  MD was 17th.  This is a program with great facilities, great local talent, and historical success.  It should not be a program that year after year is hoping to make the NCAA tournament.  High expectations for this program are warranted.

Obviously you can't assume it, but as a coach in this era you do have to anticipate it.  If I put money on it right now, I'd expect both to be gone though.  If Jackson doesn't leave it will be because he played poorly, which is something this team can't afford anyway.

Ceko leaving is certainly not a non-factor.  He provides depth and minutes in the frontcourt.  Obi is not much of a factor this year, but could be more important next year if Fernando and Jackson do indeed leave.

I agree 100% of what you said here, but isn't Obi a 5th year senior? He was always a one and done. Turgeon had to bring him in because of his inability to recruit good big men and keep them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I agree 100% of what you said here, but isn't Obi a 5th year senior? He was always a one and done. Turgeon had to bring him in because of his inability to recruit good big men and keep them.

I believe there was a possibility of him receiving either a medical redshirt or some sort of hardship redshirt.  Honestly I don't know all the details, I just recall reading something about that, and it seemed fairly optimistic that he would get it.  But I don't know how likely he is to stick around anyway if he's not playing at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

I believe there was a possibility of him receiving either a medical redshirt or some sort of hardship redshirt.  Honestly I don't know all the details, I just recall reading something about that, and it seemed fairly optimistic that he would get it.  But I don't know how likely he is to stick around anyway if he's not playing at all.

He has stone hands and besides rebounding a bit, he doesn't seem to have any other game. He's really a filler at best so if he leaves, he should not hurt the team if Turgeon has any big bodies on the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Maryland ADs have not very good for some time now. They seem to be happy with there money sports just wallowing in mediocrity. Saying that, I'm not well enough versed in potential basketball coaches that would be better than Turgeon. I just think he's had his chance and his short comings are obvious and will keep this team in the same mediocrity it's been since he's been here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, we crushed Ohio tonight. For a little perspective, last time Ohio played the Terps, they beat Gary's squad. We were pretty dreadful in Gary's last half decade here.

Bruno Fernando also hurt his ankle. Apparently just a strain, hopefully doesn't linger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I didn't want to say it, but since your brought it up.....I agree.   I have been involved in the fitness industry as both a person who has worked out with heavy weights for years, a company level as I used to own a supplement company, and a social media level as I know many of the social influencers involved in the fitness industry.   I can tell you that squatting that amount and even further dead lifting that amount, even for a fervent power lifter is very very rare.  Let alone for someone who weighs 180 pounds like JH, who is worth many millions,  and what makes it even more unlikely is there is no way IN H E L L that the O's brass is going to let him try and DL 700 pounds.  We are talking snap city when it comes to the back DLing that amount.  Just no way he could even do that based on his build, which is ok but nothing great.  Plus even IF he could, the Os would never let him.    End of story.   Here is one of the stronger guys I know on you tube who is around JH's weight, actually 10 pounds more, and it took years and years of training to DL 600 pounds for him.   Yet somehow a guy with JHs build is Deadlifting 700 at the age of 20?  Righttttttt lol.      
    • I'm looking at the Rays record over the past decade and I'm a bit confused over your definition of "have not won much". However, my argument is simple - teams that don't invest in payroll don't win championships in baseball. Over the past 21 years (I was going to do 20, but added the extra to include Florida's win in 2003), the average payroll position relative to the league of the eventual WS champ was 9th (see below) Year WS Champ OD Payroll rank 2003 FLA 25 2004 BOS 2 2005 CWS 13 2006 STL 11 2007 BOS 2 2008 PHI 12 2009 NYY 1 2010 SF 10 2011 STL 11 2012 SF 8 2013 BOS 4 2014 SF 7 2015 KC 16 2016 CHC 14 2017 HOU 18 2018 BOS 1 2019 WAS 7 2020 LAD 2 2021 ATL 13 2022 HOU 11 2023 TEX 9   Only three of these teams had payrolls in the bottom half of league: Florida in 2003 had by far the lowest payroll, at 25th. Their payroll climbed to as high as 18th over the next couple of years, but they couldn't maintain their success and haven't made the playoffs since, outside of the COVID season. KC in 2015 had the 16th lowest payroll, barely below the median payroll for the year. They haven't been back to the playoffs since. Houston in 2017 had the 18th lowest payroll. This was their big breakthrough year after their tanking/rebuild, and they haven't been lower than 11th since, and as high as 4th.   The trend is obvious. After the Marlins' miracle run in 2003, no team has won the WS with a payroll lower than 18th, and that team (Houston) is an obvious outlier as they were in the basically the same spot as the O's now (on the upswing from a full tear-down). While KC and Florida both had years where everything came together perfectly, they were unable to sustain their momentum. The O's were 23rd in payroll on Opening Day, and the current roster is good enough to win a championship, but history suggests they'll go the way of Florida and Kansas City if Rubenstein isn't willing to invest in the payroll. Consistently letting the talent drain out of your organization because you aren't willing to pay them won't lead to multiple championships and it won't keep fans engaged.
    • Correlation vs. Causation: The study states that there is a correlation between 1RM (one-rep max) squat and performance metrics like the 10-yard split and 40-yard dash times. However, correlation does not imply causation. Just because these variables are correlated does not mean that one causes the other.   
    • I think he's claimed and right away.
    • His Dad is a big boy and obvious lifter.  Some guys are naturally good squatters.  That’s an impressive number for Holliday, but who knows exactly how legit the actual squat is.  You can find high school kids at nearly every high school about his size with similar squat numbers.  Granted, they will be some of the strongest pound for pound kids, but it’s not a crazy number. 
    • Fair point, but these outliers are squatting like 40% more than Holliday is.  There are likely plenty of guys in the NCAA that can hit Holliday's numbers, and are in his age range.   There were like 50+ guys at this year's combine with a 10 yard split of 1.5 or better or 40 times of 4.5 or better, and 1rm squat correlates with both 10 yard split and 40 time, such that if you hit those numbers in 10 or 40, then your mean 1rm squat would be predicted to be about 2.5x body weight, which would be right around 500 lbs for a 200 lb guy.  If you want to call NFL caliber college guys outliers, I guess?  But Holliday is an MLB caliber guy, so he still fits.   Elite athletes just aren't normal, man.
    • The fact that they put this on the 1991 Donruss, perhaps the ultimate peak of the junk wax era, makes this even funnier to me.  If toilet paper ever shot up in price I wouldn't care because I've got heaps of '91 Donruss floating around. This is very true, which makes me thinks he'll get claimed somewhere else.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...