Jump to content

Who’s our GM & Manager Next Year?


Rene88

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 314
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Dan Kantrovitz, Athletics assistant GM
Kantrovitz, 38, has bona fides on both the scouting and analytical sides, having served two stints as Cardinals scouting director sandwiched around getting a master's degree in statistics from Harvard. He worked in analysis and international operations for the A's from 2009-11 before returning to the club in November to replace Farhan Zaidi, who became GM of the Dodgers.

Sign me up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

Dan Kantrovitz, Athletics assistant GM
Kantrovitz, 38, has bona fides on both the scouting and analytical sides, having served two stints as Cardinals scouting director sandwiched around getting a master's degree in statistics from Harvard. He worked in analysis and international operations for the A's from 2009-11 before returning to the club in November to replace Farhan Zaidi, who became GM of the Dodgers.

Sign me up.

I like this.  I'd be surprised however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

Dan Kantrovitz, Athletics assistant GM
Kantrovitz, 38, has bona fides on both the scouting and analytical sides, having served two stints as Cardinals scouting director sandwiched around getting a master's degree in statistics from Harvard. He worked in analysis and international operations for the A's from 2009-11 before returning to the club in November to replace Farhan Zaidi, who became GM of the Dodgers.

Sign me up.

I'd be down for that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, theocean said:

I think Buck as GM is nothing more than wild fan-fueled speculation. I think Buck will be back as manager. Duquette is a question mark.

I think you are right.

Buck will be back, unless he wants to retire, and its not like he hasn't said, that a couple of times, at the end of a season, he sits down with his wife and discuss if its time to ride off into the sunset.

I think DD coming back is a good possibility, I know this wont sit well with some posters. But, its all perception at this point.

Is ownership happy with his body of work within what they have placed on him?

Does ownership think they can improve the team by bringing in a new body, or promoting from within?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

The Nats are being slow to resign Rizzo, from what I have read.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jan/22/mike-rizzos-wait-could-end-costing-nationals/

 

Yes, that’s my point.    My impression is that Rizzo wants to stay with the Nats, but won’t re-sign unless they pay him a lot more than he’s making now ($2.5 mm, as I understand it).    I can’t imagine a scenario where he jumps to the O’s, but I’d love it if he did.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Rene88 said:

This offseason has been dark. Not just inactivity either...

I think the consensus is DD is gone and Buck to GM.

What say you?

It may work out like that. I already think Buck has more power than DD does anyway. I'd like to see both gone. It must be very difficult working for Angelos. So I don't know who would replace them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Brady Anderson is GM. (I don't endorse this)

 

9 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Brady Anderson is GM. (I don't endorse this)

Oh no. Not Brady. Angelos has him in his pocket already. I think that'd be a terrible move. IMO 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Yes, that’s my point.    My impression is that Rizzo wants to stay with the Nats, but won’t re-sign unless they pay him a lot more than he’s making now ($2.5 mm, as I understand it).    I can’t imagine a scenario where he jumps to the O’s, but I’d love it if he did.    

It would be nice to have.

Rizzo is already making more than DD is, and I dont see Peter paying super big bucks to a GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Let  Westy  play 3B vs right handed pitching and LF vs left-handed pitching.    Urias can play 3B vs lefties.   This is only needed if Cowser can't hit lefties. Mateo and Westy can be platoon in the outfield IMO.
    • O'Neil seems like a perfect fit if he doesn't cost too much in years or dollars.   
    • I don’t think we choked. Stubborn as hell. We literally went down with the same sinking ship philosophy that we had the entire 2nd half of the season.  The young guys just have to adjust. I mean getting completely shut down for 5 post season games has to wear on them. If it doesn’t, then we were never built to win. 
    • Right now the 2025 OF has three LHH OF in Cowser, Mullins, and Kjerstad. I’m not sure what the bench makeup of this team will be, but it looks like we’ll need 1-2 RHH options.  We could bring Slater back on a small “Tony Kemp” like 1 year deal or a milb deal.  With Santander leaving, and Mateo back to being in the CF mix once healthy, do we go with a more COF RHH type? Trades are a possibility as well, but here is a list of upcoming RHH OF Free Agents,    
    • I actually didn't suggest a reliever as the return, that was SG. I was thinking more about trading veterans to acquire pitching prospects, probably lower level lottery tickets. I'd rather pick up ML roster pieces through free agency (assuming of course that Rubenstein will allow a significant payroll boost.).
    • Each player is different. Each player may have a somewhat different hitting philosophy, based on their strengths and weaknesses. Not everyone is a “power hitter.” I would not coach a Tony Santander the same as a Jordan Westburg, or a Jorge Mateo, or a Cedric Mullins. Some should be more selective, while others may need to do more damage and it’s ok for them to K more because the power payoff is worth it. Some should have a more oppo approach, while others may need to try to pull the ball more. The Waltimore certainly has messed with many of our RH bats.  Being a hitting coach is a lot of work, and it is usually not often a position held for many years. They seem to often be a scapegoat when the players do not hit. I wonder what drove the players to swing more at pitches they probably should not have. I seriously doubt it was Ryan Fuller. Hitting coaches have a general philosophical approach, like Fuller would have hitters learn to take pitches they cannot hit well, with less than 2 strikes.. He wanted them to swing only at pitches they can do damage with. They do not dramatically change. For the Orioles to become much more free swinging, that must have driven Fuller to leave. So be it. Going forward, they probably need to be somewhere in between the previous two years. In the playoffs, they get pitched to differently. It’s higher intensity. You have to be proficient in putting the ball in play. You have to be able to take what the game gives you, and execute. There is no excuse for repeatedly having runners in scoring position with less than two outs and repeatedly not being able to get them home. Bases loaded, no outs, hitters 2,3 and 4 coming up…we have to score there. The approach was to hit a grand slam. Awful baseball. A ton of talent on this roster, and something has to change. 
    • I have been pretty happy with Kjerstad's defense in the outfield corners.   Not that I want him in left at home.     I agree with what Elias said about Mayo's body type being more suited for 1B.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...