Jump to content

Sun Next?


weams

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, weams said:

 

Do people read newspapers now days? I haven't read a newspaper in a long time. When I can get all the news I can stomach off the internet. I read Colts news off the internet and O's news here. No newspaper needed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tx Oriole said:

Do people read newspapers now days? I haven't read a newspaper in a long time. When I can get all the news I can stomach off the internet. I read Colts news off the internet and O's news here. No newspaper needed. 

Last time I bought a newspaper I needed something to pile the steamed crabs on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Frobby said:

 

I enjoy the feel of a newspaper in my hands. And I have more trust in the news I get there than I do from most internet sources. That’s not to say I trust all of it.

   

o

 

That's what one of my professors in college said when one of the students in our class told him that there was no need to buy newspapers anymore when you can get them for free on the internet ........ he smiled and said, "There's something about actually having that newspaper in your hands that you can quite grasp in the same manner when you are reading it from the internet."

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Print means permanence. That's one of many reasons why it is more reliable than digital 'news.' Newspapers can't print outright lies without having to answer for what they printed. Online content can be, and is, edited as desired, especially when originally posted with malicious intent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I enjoy the feel of a newspaper in my hands.    And I have more trust in the news I get there than I do from most internet sources.    That’s not to say I trust all of it.    

I agree.   I also work in a situation with limited work internet, so I read a paper (or two) with my lunch every day.

And when I have a whole paper, I read the whole paper.   No, not every article, but I go through every page and read articles of interest.

It might not add to my knowledge of the Orioles, because I go places like this and get all I need.

Today's Sun had an article on how they are reviving Hammerjacks that included the history of the old Hammerjacks, plans for the new one, etc.   It was interesting, I have many memories of the old Hammerjacks.   But if I didn't have a paper, there's no way I would have woken up this morning and decided to search the web for information on Hammerjacks.

Yesterday's health section had an article on new treatment for Parkinson's.   It's not a disease that I or anyone close to me has, but it is interesting information.   I never would have woke up yesterday and decided to look for something like that on the web.

There are examples of that every day.   I think if you at least peruse a newspaper daily and read articles of interest, you will wind up a lot more well rounded and knowledgable in the long run.   Not to mention if it is your local paper, you will know a lot more about the community you live in.   I know about bills that are before the legislature in Maryland that I would never have searched out information on otherwise.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I still read a newspaper every day.

I've subscribed to the Harrisburg Patriot-News for years.  When they cut back to printing only three issues a week, I started going to the local convenience store and picking up a copy of the York Daily Record on those days that the Patriot-News doesn't publish.  I figured it would be hard for a newspaper that calls itself the Daily Record to change its schedule and print on a less frequent basis.

A few weeks ago, the Daily Record increased its price - by 100%.  They went from $1.00 per issue right to $2.00 per issue.  They gave no explanation for the move and certainly did not increase their content.

I've long said a newspaper would be cheap at twice the price.  And I still feel that way, so I'm still buying the Daily Record. 

I'd hate to think that the Daily Record was intentionally trying to price itself out of business.  But I notice that every time I go into the convenience store to buy my paper, no matter what time of day it is, there are exactly four copies of the Daily Record on the shelf.  I can't avoid the suspicion that only four copies are delivered every day and I'm the only one who ever buys one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SteveA said:

I agree.   I also work in a situation with limited work internet, so I read a paper (or two) with my lunch every day.

And when I have a whole paper, I read the whole paper.   No, not every article, but I go through every page and read articles of interest.

It might not add to my knowledge of the Orioles, because I go places like this and get all I need.

Today's Sun had an article on how they are reviving Hammerjacks that included the history of the old Hammerjacks, plans for the new one, etc.   It was interesting, I have many memories of the old Hammerjacks.   But if I didn't have a paper, there's no way I would have woken up this morning and decided to search the web for information on Hammerjacks.

Yesterday's health section had an article on new treatment for Parkinson's.   It's not a disease that I or anyone close to me has, but it is interesting information.   I never would have woke up yesterday and decided to look for something like that on the web.

There are examples of that every day.   I think if you at least peruse a newspaper daily and read articles of interest, you will wind up a lot more well rounded and knowledgable in the long run.   Not to mention if it is your local paper, you will know a lot more about the community you live in.   I know about bills that are before the legislature in Maryland that I would never have searched out information on otherwise.

 

 

Every day the internet gets better and better at showing all of us less and less variety and in the process increasing our igorance and shrinking our tolerance.  It won't be long before your normal daily routine will be marveled at as some long, lost secret.  My advice is patent your habit and when people suddenly recoginze there's genius in a balanced informational diet, you might make a few bucks off it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Tx Oriole said:

Do people read newspapers now days? I haven't read a newspaper in a long time. When I can get all the news I can stomach off the internet. I read Colts news off the internet and O's news here. No newspaper needed. 

Online....I still read Mike Preston and Schmuck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, WillyM said:

Yes, I still read a newspaper every day.

I've subscribed to the Harrisburg Patriot-News for years.  When they cut back to printing only three issues a week, I started going to the local convenience store and picking up a copy of the York Daily Record on those days that the Patriot-News doesn't publish.  I figured it would be hard for a newspaper that calls itself the Daily Record to change its schedule and print on a less frequent basis.

A few weeks ago, the Daily Record increased its price - by 100%.  They went from $1.00 per issue right to $2.00 per issue.  They gave no explanation for the move and certainly did not increase their content.

I've long said a newspaper would be cheap at twice the price.  And I still feel that way, so I'm still buying the Daily Record. 

I'd hate to think that the Daily Record was intentionally trying to price itself out of business.  But I notice that every time I go into the convenience store to buy my paper, no matter what time of day it is, there are exactly four copies of the Daily Record on the shelf.  I can't avoid the suspicion that only four copies are delivered every day and I'm the only one who ever buys one.

Good stuff. Neighbor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I agree, McCann C is decision number one. After that, against a reverse split guy I think you just start your best overall players. However, O'Hearn has such poor splits vs LHP and so little experience I can't imagine they start him. Adley DH would allow Hyde to avoid the O'Hearn vs LHP decision. Kjerstad had hit lefties well but they gave him only 18 AB. That is a big ask of a rookie. Might be Adley if they think McCann makes Burnes better. Definite starters: Gunnar, Westburg, Santander, Mountcastle, Urias, Cowser Probable: Mullins Pick two: Adley, McCann, O'Hearn, Kjerstad  
    • What you said here is what I’ve been trying to convey.  OAA and dWAR aren’t intended to measure the same thing.   They shouldn’t be mentioned together.  If Fangraphs took its FRV and Positional stats and added them together, then divided that number by 10ish to convert it from runs to wins, you’d have a stat to compare to dWAR.
    • I think Adley is the DH tomorrow. 
    • Nice job pointing out Ragans pitches better against righties than lefties: The Orioles put a heavy emphasis on the pitcher's splits over the hitter's split, so Mullins could very well start. Interestingly though, lefties BABIP was a unsustainable .345. Here's his pitch% and results against lefties this year. With this info, I think the Orioles very well may start Mullins instead of Slater. Now, will they start O'Hearn over Rivera at DH?
    • Nope I wanna see the guy with the better defense. Just pointing out that Slater’s only “advantage” is another liability. Plus, Reagan’s is a reverse splits guy. 
    • The late season partial revival was enough for BAL to finish 3rd MLB-wide to the Judge/Soto team and the Shohei/Mookie/Freddie one. Split up those first two and put another year on everybody else, and I like our shot to go 1st some season soon. Park effects, it is notable the FG readout gives the Orioles with a 250/315/435 line a fraction of a point edge in the 115 wRC+ tie for 3rd and 4th with the Diamondbacks, who posted a 263/337/440 line. Don't be dull, October Orange Machine.
    • Mullins has slashed .196/.228/.278/.506 against lefties this year. Slater has not had a great year overall and his September was terrible, but the Orioles really like platoon matchups. Plus, having Mullins speed and pop on the bench gives them options late in games.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...