Jump to content

Duquette in mix for Mets new GM


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, Frobby said:

I think you’re very wrong.    Teams aren’t allowed to talk with free agent players before their contracts expire, and the same applies to front office personnel, managers and coaches.    

Teams aren't supposed to have deals in place with underage international prospects either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Finisher said:

Just googled to see if they were still together (was assuming not). Apparently she tried to kill him in 2013.

She's not aged well.  I always thought she was a bit overrated (as far as being a beauty) even in her prime.  She was certainly good at getting publicity though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, atomic said:

If DD has other options why wouldn't he take them?  He could get a 4 year deal and by the time the deal ends he would be retirement age.  

Well, I am more than comfortable saying that question was asked and answered in 2014.

35 minutes ago, atomic said:

Not if you are just selling the team and your main goal is to cut as much salary from the books and you don't want to sign any GM to a deal beyond this season. 

If I am trading off assets, I want to get something back regardless of the long term goal.  But as to all of this being part of a strategy to lower salary...well I'm gonna stick with actions speak louder than words. But I admit, there is an awful lot of window dressing going on and an awful lot of good things being said without firm commitments.

Personally, I'd like more details on the rebuild plans and I'd like an announcement as to a leader of that plan.  I't doesn't have to be today, but as all of this is happening, there are articles today linking our GM to another team and another article saying our rebuild should be around Buck.  These are just words....but they speak to actions not taken.  Neither Buck nor DD are committed to the rebuild.  So, there is kind of a plan, and DD has been articulating and following it.  But I don't think this can wait till November and if someone didn't win a power struggle, then the chances that anything really has changed are pretty small.

I dont like stuff coming out today on Buck and DD at all.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

Their plan at the TD was too consistent. If they were up in the air about the next GM they would't have been. 

I would agree that most of the tea leaves signaled DD had won the power struggle...And yet today there are two articles, one saying Buck should be kept and built around, the other that the Mets are open to DD.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

After reading the article, it’s pretty thin.  Mets need a GM.  Duquette needs a job.  Presto chango, viola!  But not one even anonymous source.  Total speculation.

Cafardo is good at speculation, facts, not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

Their plan at the TD was too consistent. If they were up in the air about the next GM they would't have been. 

It would be surprising to me if they let a GM that is leaving trade Gausman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, VaBird1 said:

It would be surprising to me if they let a GM that is leaving trade Gausman.

I agree. He traded both Schoop and Gausman and the plan he has detailed seems to be his. I think he's back next season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

Cafardo is good at speculation, facts, not so much.

His paragraph about the Mets GM job is mostly about Ben Cherington being mentioned for the job.   He then goes on to say: “Also mentioned for the job are Orioles GM Dan Duquette, former Dodgers GM Ned Colletti, and former Red Sox scouting director Jared Porter.”     Just who is “mentioning” these names is unclear.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Going Underground said:

So if Duquette goes to the Mets,maybe we can get Anna Benson as GM.She can probably make some nice trades. An offer you cant refuse.

Can refuse because she'll kill you? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
    • I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.
    • I was clearly talking about the AL...
    • You mean like how the Os dealt guys like Hays, Stowers and Norby?  Yea, guys who are good depth but guys we can stand to trade are guys I want to trade….and obviously Elias feels similarly. These guys carry value. The level of value depends on the player and you can debate the value of return but yes, you absolutely should trade out of depth and trade guys that perhaps that don’t match your team philosophies.  That’s what teams do.
    • Who knows.  Lots of possibilities. There could be another trade like the Hays trade.  Or maybe you can get a ML ready arm that profiles as a high end reliever. I don’t think that you will get a proven lock down guy but that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone that will end up a big contributor.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...