Jump to content

The Victor Victor Mesa/Sandy Gaston thread


Luke-OH

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

How many different ways do I have to say this before you understand?

A player whose talent level puts them outside the top 10 list of international prospects for a given year isn't going to have the talent to crack the top 10 in the draft as a HS student.

Even if you put him in a weak league in which he can dominate with a 100 MPH FB and nothing else.

 

You have no clue how he would do. Maybe a HS coach shows him another pitch.  If it's bugging you repeating yourself...stop wasting your time. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
28 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

That WE HAVE A CLUE about what they are asking for.

Which you said we didn't have.

A clue does exist.

Not what each individual player is demanding we don't. 

And it's not like the Marlins HAVE to use the acquired pool money. Could be a juat in case. 

Who cares at this point. The Orioles probably get none of the three. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

But we do have some clue.  Data points do exist.

Improperly using absolutes is one of my pet peeves.  ?

It wasn't an absolute. Can you for sure say Gaston wouldn't be a top pick out of high school throwing a 100mph but needing work on secondary pitches? Isn't that what minor league coaches are for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dark Helmet said:

It wasn't an absolute. Can you for sure say Gaston wouldn't be a top pick out of high school throwing a 100mph but needing work on secondary pitches? Isn't that what minor league coaches are for?

I would say that we are not completely without knowledge.

Just because we can't rule it out doesn't mean we have "no clue".

For instance we know a right handed HS pitcher has never gone #1.  We have a fair idea what players are currently being looked at in the top 10 and can estimate how much Gaston would have to improve.

Those are clues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, atomic said:

Also why Victor Victor is a bigger draw. He isn't 16 and you have a better idea of what you are getting.  Some 16 year old's are done growing. Some have barely started. 

Also good chance the 16 year old pitcher blows out his arm during the development process further delaying any chance at a MLB debut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

He gets a "weird" message from a source he's not familiar with and he gets offended when folks question him?

If you want context on that tweet, then here it is.

A few folks were saying that by spending a ton on Mesas, Gaston, whoever that it shows international prospects that the Orioles are for real and will increase the Orioles ability to sign future prospects.  I replied that this is not really what happens.  Big money will sign players, yes.  But big money is transient.  What actually works when you are developing your network and fostering those relationships are not a history of big money, but that they trust you and the money you offer is not overwhelmed by anyone else throwing down an offer.  Signing a player for a lot of money simply does not move the needle when you look at future signings.

A couple commenters pushed back with thought exercises about what 15 year olds want in life. I told them that it simply is not how it works based on experiences communicated to me through people who have worked there for decades.  That got some snide remarks, so I then wrote OK nevermind the experiences and knowledge I have and am sharing with you all.  I do not know everything.  I am not an expert here, but I probably have a lot more experience than someone who is playacting a teenager. These are things that I have specifically engaged on and I feel incredibly confidant on that information. If the commenter can get yourself some primary sources who say otherwise, then that adds to the discussion.  If the foundation of the argument is that personal experience as a teenager is that it was fun to buy things, then I will disregard that as adding nothing to the conversation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The earliest 2025 NFBC results exist, and slotted him about the 30th best AL starter for 2025 alone's expected statistical production.    Eflin and all five guys in Tampa's forecast rotation (Baz, McClanahan, Pepiot, Bradley, Springs) fell around that level. That assumes free agents Burnes, Snell, Flaherty, Kikuchi, Pivetta, Fried and Manaea fall about half into the AL. He'll start Opening Day, but it is a byproduct of the disappointing beginning to Grayson's career and Bradish's current injury. I think odds are pretty low he is a 2026 Oriole.
    • Whoever we add needs to be able to play a solid CF or LF at OPACY and Pham definitely does not fit that bill.
    • I'm one for Tommy Pham, even though I'll take heat for it.  I think the veteran aspect of it could be key. O'Neil would be great, but he also brings more of what we have in the Ks and HRs department
    • Let's see how he does over a full year here first so we don't overpay for a SSS. He was pretty pedestrian prior to the trade.
    • I could see against tough lefties Holiday sits, Westy at 2B, and Mayo at 3B.  Or Holiday at SS to spell Gunnar sometimes too and this being the configuration. But yes, most of Holiday at 2B, Westy at 3B and Mayo DH or 1B.
    • I don't think you bring Slater back if you add Bader (unless Austin's willing to take a MiLB deal and start the year at Norfolk) because then you have to get rid of either Urias or Mateo, and that doesn't seem wise with how thinned out the IF depth is now and Holliday still trying to get his feet under him.
    • This is true. However, it is more situational in the post season. Guys are pitched to differently. You have to take what the game gives you. Home runs happen, but the best teams know when to take that shot and when to shorten up or be more line drive oriented. Home runs can be a surprise to good hitters who simply were in time and put a good swing on plane through the ball. It was a line drive that ran out of field. Hitters have to know who they are. Some sit on fast balls early in the count in a certain small box. If they get it, they take that A swing. Or maybe they sit off speed early. They may take a strike that is more of a pitcher’s pitch, or one they were not looking for. if you’re sitting fastball early, not a great idea to swing at a curveball. Or vice versa. Whatever the case, with two strikes, you have to think contact and productive at bat. For some, that approach may be sooner in the at bat, of the situation dictates it. There is no BABIP if there is not a ball in play. So luck plays no role in a strikeout. It seemed like the Orioles, as a whole, in 2024 were looking a certain pitch, and if the pitch was hittable they would hack. Even if it was just off the plate. Too many big swings, and tons of resulting misses, in key situations where shortening up a bit was the better approach. Lastly, not many of our guys are true “home run hitters.” What I mean by that is when Santander strikes out swinging at a piece ch with a big cut. I get it. That is his game to be focused on driving the ball. That is what he gets paid to do. Along with that comes a fair amount of swing and miss, and roll over ground balls. Not all our hitters should be having the same approach. Gunnar may hit 35-40 home runs in a season, but he is a much more dynamic hitter than just a “home run guy.” He is capable of doing anything on the field. He is extremely talented, and we have a few more that may fall into that category some day. There are times to adjust and take what the game gives you. Go oppo for a single, put pressure on the defense. This game is hard, but we can do better. If we are going to win, we must do much better.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...