Jump to content

2018 top 1-5 Prospects Vote


Tony-OH

Who are #1-5 prospects for 2018  

69 members have voted

  1. 1. Who are #1-5 prospects for 2018

    • DL Hall, Mountcastle, Diaz, Rodriguez, Akin
    • Mountcastle, DL Hall, Diaz, Ortiz, Rodriguez
    • DL Hall, Rodriguez, Mountcastle, Kremer, Diaz
    • Diaz, DL Hall, Mountcastle, Rodriguez, McKenna
    • DL Hall, Mountcastle, Diaz, Rodriguez, Kremer

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 11/08/18 at 05:00

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Is the order in which they’re listed supposed to indicate the order in which they’re ranked?   I note that Lists 3 and 5 are the same except for the order.

Hall, Mountcastle, Diaz and Rodriguez appear on all five lists, so it boils down to whether you think Akin, Ortiz, McKenna or Kremer is the one deserving of a top 5 spot.    Or another way to look at it is which of those four could you not see being relegated to 11th or lower.    

I’m voting for List 5 (Kremer in 5th) even though my personal vote would be for List 1 (Akin in 5th).   I just have the feeling Tony is higher on Kremer than Akin.    

Yes, the order listed is the ranking 1-5. You have a good feeling. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 hours ago, REDMAN said:

Mountcastle cannot be rated above 5th in the orioles system, he, at the present time, is only a DH, he can't play defense in the MLB with that arm,  he is all bat at this point. The orioles has many other two way players who should be considered better players than he is.

 

So you vote "None of the above".

Man, if you are right, that will be one trick poll Tony has pulled on us all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

How is Kremer #6? Hays is #6. Let me see if there is way to let you revote. Never tried that before. If not just put your vote in here and I'll count that if you are right.

If Hays is #6 than 6-10 was option #1.   Hays, Harvey, Lowther, Knight and Haniffee.   And if that is true there is no telling whether McKenna, Akin, Ortiz or Kremer are in the top 5.   You have to think like Tony!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

If Hays is #6 than 6-10 was option #1.   Hays, Harvey, Lowther, Knight and Haniffee.   And if that is true there is no telling whether McKenna, Akin, Ortiz or Kremer are in the top 5.   You have to think like Tony!

Good advice from a veteran of these votes! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, SteveA said:

So you vote "None of the above".

Man, if you are right, that will be one trick poll Tony has pulled on us all.

Not a trick poll, just a opinion, can only judge on what I have seen and who I have seen play, I read every scouting report I can find on the orioles prospects, but until I see them play I won't comment. Mountcastle is a stud hitter in a league where DH is easy to fill, there is no premium on a DH prospect, so putting him in the top five is a bad indication.h 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, REDMAN said:

Not a trick poll, just a opinion, can only judge on what I have seen and who I have seen play, I read every scouting report I can find on the orioles prospects, but until I see them play I won't comment. Mountcastle is a stud hitter in a league where DH is easy to fill, there is no premium on a DH prospect, so putting him in the top five is a bad indication.h 

Although he's not a third basemen, Mountcastle is not some DH only player in my opinion. I would try him in left field first but he should have no problem playing first base if needed. His hands aren't awful and there are aren't a ton of throws that a first baseman has to make. The impact potential of his bat gets him rated so highly. The Orioles really don't have a guy who has average and power potential like Mountcastle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, LookinUp said:

I’m not exactly expert, but love Akin, so I went with #1. Whatever the list, three of McKenna, Akin, Kramer and Ortiz aren’t top 10.

I’m not sure what that says, but it says something.

It says we like ten guys better than three of them. ;) We'll explain in their profiles. Saying that, I think all four of them are big leaguers in some role and considering three of them will be outside the top ten, that says the depth of the system is improving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

It says we like ten guys better than three of them. ;) We'll explain in their profiles. Saying that, I think all four of them are big leaguers in some role and considering three of them will be outside the top ten, that says the depth of the system is improving.

This is pretty important.  I think many times when we argue over who sits where, we are arguing over flavors.  I don't like chocolate or vanilla, I like strawberry.  We just need more ice cream!

Good to hear we are improving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

The annual offseason vote to figure out who's going to be the biggest disappointment.  

? woe is Moose!    Don’t worry, once a decade or so the player will actually pan out, until he’s a free agent or close.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

The annual offseason vote to figure out who's going to be the biggest disappointment.  

They should call this award is the OHAHHA award.

 

You know....

 

You know...

 

The Oriole Hangout Annual Hunter Harvey Award!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, foxfield said:

This is pretty important.  I think many times when we argue over who sits where, we are arguing over flavors.  I don't like chocolate or vanilla, I like strawberry.  We just need more ice cream!

Good to hear we are improving.

That's part of the reason for putting out the current, most likely, and ceiling scouting grades. Those are more important than ranking order in my opinion but everyone likes lists. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Let  Westy  play 3B vs right handed pitching and LF vs left-handed pitching.    Urias can play 3B vs lefties.   This is only needed if Cowser can't hit lefties. Mateo and Westy can be platoon in the outfield IMO.
    • O'Neil seems like a perfect fit if he doesn't cost too much in years or dollars.   
    • I don’t think we choked. Stubborn as hell. We literally went down with the same sinking ship philosophy that we had the entire 2nd half of the season.  The young guys just have to adjust. I mean getting completely shut down for 5 post season games has to wear on them. If it doesn’t, then we were never built to win. 
    • Right now the 2025 OF has three LHH OF in Cowser, Mullins, and Kjerstad. I’m not sure what the bench makeup of this team will be, but it looks like we’ll need 1-2 RHH options.  We could bring Slater back on a small “Tony Kemp” like 1 year deal or a milb deal.  With Santander leaving, and Mateo back to being in the CF mix once healthy, do we go with a more COF RHH type? Trades are a possibility as well, but here is a list of upcoming RHH OF Free Agents,    
    • I actually didn't suggest a reliever as the return, that was SG. I was thinking more about trading veterans to acquire pitching prospects, probably lower level lottery tickets. I'd rather pick up ML roster pieces through free agency (assuming of course that Rubenstein will allow a significant payroll boost.).
    • Each player is different. Each player may have a somewhat different hitting philosophy, based on their strengths and weaknesses. Not everyone is a “power hitter.” I would not coach a Tony Santander the same as a Jordan Westburg, or a Jorge Mateo, or a Cedric Mullins. Some should be more selective, while others may need to do more damage and it’s ok for them to K more because the power payoff is worth it. Some should have a more oppo approach, while others may need to try to pull the ball more. The Waltimore certainly has messed with many of our RH bats.  Being a hitting coach is a lot of work, and it is usually not often a position held for many years. They seem to often be a scapegoat when the players do not hit. I wonder what drove the players to swing more at pitches they probably should not have. I seriously doubt it was Ryan Fuller. Hitting coaches have a general philosophical approach, like Fuller would have hitters learn to take pitches they cannot hit well, with less than 2 strikes.. He wanted them to swing only at pitches they can do damage with. They do not dramatically change. For the Orioles to become much more free swinging, that must have driven Fuller to leave. So be it. Going forward, they probably need to be somewhere in between the previous two years. In the playoffs, they get pitched to differently. It’s higher intensity. You have to be proficient in putting the ball in play. You have to be able to take what the game gives you, and execute. There is no excuse for repeatedly having runners in scoring position with less than two outs and repeatedly not being able to get them home. Bases loaded, no outs, hitters 2,3 and 4 coming up…we have to score there. The approach was to hit a grand slam. Awful baseball. A ton of talent on this roster, and something has to change. 
    • I have been pretty happy with Kjerstad's defense in the outfield corners.   Not that I want him in left at home.     I agree with what Elias said about Mayo's body type being more suited for 1B.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...