Jump to content

Who should be dealt this winter/off-season?


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Too hard to quote whjoe on my phone...

 

2017 is as much an anomaly as 2018. He's not a .340 hitter, 1.091. Anymore than he is .150/0.480 . He's probably about the average of the two. Both are rougly 1/4 of a full season. Small sample size, standard (tho wild) deviation.

If anything I think  his  injury  hurt him  last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the team will do whatever the analytics tell us.  The evaluation of every player is going to change. Maybe Bundy has tons of untapped potential. Or maybe his value is at its highest right now. 

I think the intention of the team is to be really bad and stockpile top top draft picks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/13/2018 at 8:56 AM, whjoe said:

Mancini got hurt and was not the same for 3 months. Remember the slide under the fence. Dipped again in September. I don't think this guy would ever let on or use that as an excuse. He was nowhere near as good this year with RISP as he was last year. Big drop. Was it the injury/slump or having zero in the line up so not seeing as many fat pitches? Pressing? All 3?              What do you guys think?

I don't think he was hurt that much. He hit well after the supposed injury, then flatlined. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe hold onto Bundy for part of the year, but move him to the pen where he can raise his value before being traded. No one on this team is going to help us win a championship. Trade 'em all. I'd rather win 55 next season and have the 1:1 than win 65 and draft later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mdbdotcom said:

Maybe hold onto Bundy for part of the year, but move him to the pen where he can raise his value before being traded. No one on this team is going to help us win a championship. Trade 'em all. I'd rather win 55 next season and have the 1:1 than win 65 and draft later.

Why would a reliever be worth more than a starter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Why would a reliever be worth more than a starter?

A good reliever is worth more than a starter with a 5+ ERA. I think Bundy could excel in a relief role, especially if he took the governor off his fastball and threw without fear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

A good reliever is worth more than a starter with a 5+ ERA. I think Bundy could excel in a relief role, especially if he took the governor off his fastball and threw without fear.

First off you are assuming he pitches to a 5 run ERA going forward, secondly you are assuming he would excel in a relief role.  Bundy pitched in relief his rookie year, I would not say he excelled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

First off you are assuming he pitches to a 5 run ERA going forward, secondly you are assuming he would excel in a relief role.  Bundy pitched in relief his rookie year, I would not say he excelled.

I am assuming that no one wants him now because he pitched to a 5+  ERA last year. Yes, I am assuming that he would excel in a relief role. I could be wrong, but I'd chance it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

I am assuming that no one wants him now because he pitched to a 5+  ERA last year. Yes, I am assuming that he would excel in a relief role. I could be wrong, but I'd chance it.

9.6 k/9 last season.

7.3 k/9 career in the pen.  Reliever ERA of 2.95 isn't excellent.

I don't see data to your theories.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

9.6 k/9 last season.

7.3 k/9 career in the pen.  Reliever ERA of 2.95 isn't excellent.

I don't see data to your theories.

 

They aren't theories, just opinions. He's gained a lot of experience he can leverage now that he didn't have as a rookie in the pen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Whoever we add needs to be able to play a solid CF or LF at OPACY and Pham definitely does not fit that bill.
    • I'm one for Tommy Pham, even though I'll take heat for it.  I think the veteran aspect of it could be key. O'Neil would be great, but he also brings more of what we have in the Ks and HRs department
    • Let's see how he does over a full year here first so we don't overpay for a SSS. He was pretty pedestrian prior to the trade.
    • I could see against tough lefties Holiday sits, Westy at 2B, and Mayo at 3B.  Or Holiday at SS to spell Gunnar sometimes too and this being the configuration. But yes, most of Holiday at 2B, Westy at 3B and Mayo DH or 1B.
    • I don't think you bring Slater back if you add Bader (unless Austin's willing to take a MiLB deal and start the year at Norfolk) because then you have to get rid of either Urias or Mateo, and that doesn't seem wise with how thinned out the IF depth is now and Holliday still trying to get his feet under him.
    • This is true. However, it is more situational in the post season. Guys are pitched to differently. You have to take what the game gives you. Home runs happen, but the best teams know when to take that shot and when to shorten up or be more line drive oriented. Home runs can be a surprise to good hitters who simply were in time and put a good swing on plane through the ball. It was a line drive that ran out of field. Hitters have to know who they are. Some sit on fast balls early in the count in a certain small box. If they get it, they take that A swing. Or maybe they sit off speed early. They may take a strike that is more of a pitcher’s pitch, or one they were not looking for. if you’re sitting fastball early, not a great idea to swing at a curveball. Or vice versa. Whatever the case, with two strikes, you have to think contact and productive at bat. For some, that approach may be sooner in the at bat, of the situation dictates it. There is no BABIP if there is not a ball in play. So luck plays no role in a strikeout. It seemed like the Orioles, as a whole, in 2024 were looking a certain pitch, and if the pitch was hittable they would hack. Even if it was just off the plate. Too many big swings, and tons of resulting misses, in key situations where shortening up a bit was the better approach. Lastly, not many of our guys are true “home run hitters.” What I mean by that is when Santander strikes out swinging at a piece ch with a big cut. I get it. That is his game to be focused on driving the ball. That is what he gets paid to do. Along with that comes a fair amount of swing and miss, and roll over ground balls. Not all our hitters should be having the same approach. Gunnar may hit 35-40 home runs in a season, but he is a much more dynamic hitter than just a “home run guy.” He is capable of doing anything on the field. He is extremely talented, and we have a few more that may fall into that category some day. There are times to adjust and take what the game gives you. Go oppo for a single, put pressure on the defense. This game is hard, but we can do better. If we are going to win, we must do much better.   
    • I think of it differently.   I think keeping the  top 4 prospects in Holliday, Kjerstad, Mayo and Basallo  will influence who the O's add.   These 4 are keepers to build around for the next 6 years.   They will help keep the payroll low while providing improving performance. A year ago the O's had a surplus of position players in the top levels of the organization.    Elias decided to trade Joey Ortiz,  Norby, Stowers, Hovath, Etzel and Billy Cook to fill holes.    This thined out the prospects at the higher levels.   So I don't see the top four being traded for many years.   They will become part of the O's core players at the major league level IMO.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...