Jump to content

A pivotal player in O's history that rarely gets mentioned


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

After Frank Robinson's passing last week, I went down a baseballreference.com/wiki/youtube rabbit hole that was pretty encompassing.  Of course, started with Frank Robinson but it branched off to other players from the mid 60s up until the early 70s.  

There was one player that I read up on that piqued my interest more than a lot of others and I came to learn that he was pretty pivotal for the Orioles success.  This player spent 5 years with the O's, and is a Hall of Famer.  I first heard of him when I was a kid, in the early 90s, when his jersey was represented on a giveaway tankard at Memorial Stadium that I still have which is kind of awkward as he's not in the Hall of Fame as an Oriole.

In 1966, he tied Frank for 2nd place with hits in the American League with 182.  Of course, that was during Frank's Triple Crown season, so this guy might not have provided the power but certainly rapped out hits at a solid rate that summer.

He also lead the league in stolen bases twice as an Oriole, first with 40 in one season and then 57 in the next.  He picked up two Gold Gloves, secured two All-Star berths and received MVP votes in three seasons.  In the 1966 World Series, a Series without a lot of scoring he hit .250 and chipped in two RBIs.  And for you WAR-mongers, his WAR totals were 2.5, 5.2, 4.0 4.2 and a low 0.6 in his final year.

From what I can tell, Luis Aparicio is a really overlooked player in Orioles history.  Not just from the perspective of what he did on the field, but how he ties into the history of the franchise.  The 1962 Orioles were 77-85, and then dealt Hoyt Wilhelm, Ron Hansen, Dave Nicholson and Pete Ward to the White Sox for Little Looie and Al Smith before the 1963 season.  The parallel to the Frank Robinson trade I found interesting is that the Sox seemed to think that Aparicio was over the hill and done.  He'd showed up overweight for the 1962 season, didn't have a great year (still won a Gold Glove, made both All Star Games and lead the league in steals...and caught stealing) and the Sox tried to decrease his salary.  Aparicio demanded a trade and the Sox shipped him to Baltimore.  It was a good trade for both teams as Wilhelm went on to do great things for the Sox but Aparicio seemed to have a good impact on his new team.

The Orioles bumped their win total to 86 in '63 and then 97 in 1964.  The left side of the Orioles infield in 1964 must have been a sight to behold as Brooks won the MVP and a Gold Glove and Aparicio won a Gold Glove as well.

The Orioles shipped him back to the White Sox after 1967 for...Don Buford, who'd go on to be a stud leadoff man for the '68-'72 teams.  Aparicio, IMO, played an interesting part in Orioles history as he helped shore up the defense for some really good teams and a great one in 1966.  But the piece he was traded for in '67 was super important as well.  

When searching for greatest players in Orioles history, his name doesn't come up too often.  And I'm not saying he belongs in the top 15 or even 20 (but I think you could make a case).  After Aparicio, the Orioles certainly had their share of great shortstops with guys like Belanger, Cal, and Tejada so I think he's certainly overshadowed by them.  That said, I don't think many teams could boast a Mount Rushmore of shortstops like that.  

But as far as someone who was important from a playing perspective and for what he fetched in a trade to boost the franchise into the late 60s and early 70s, Luis Aparicio seems a pretty pivotal player that often gets overlooked in Orioles history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aparicio was an interesting player, a poor hitter, but a very good fielder and base runner.  He had combination of talents that would be utilized differently today.  When he came to the majors nobody had really stolen bases since the 1920s.  That's an exaggeration, but by 1945 steals were almost dead.  In '49 some guy named Bob Dillinger led the AL with 20 steals.  Aparicio led the AL his rookie year with 21. The late 40s and early 50s were more station-to-station baseball than today.

GMs and managers got kind of enamored with steals after Aparicio and Maury Wills came up, and got all mixed up and started batting guys with .311 OBPs (Aparicio's real career mark) leadoff.  Aparicio batted 1st or 2nd in almost 10,000 PAs and played 150 games a year.  But he never scored 100 runs in a season, even once.  In '59, when he finished 2nd in the MVP voting, he led the league in outs made.  He's 14th all time in outs.  But if you read things like Baseball Digest from the 1960s they thought Aparicio was a wonderful leadoff hitter.  He wasn't.  In 1966 he scored 97 runs but that was leading off every day and leading the league in PAs - per PA he scored the same number of runs as Boog or Brooks.

But... because he was a very good shortstop and a good baserunner he actually had a reasonable HOF career despite being one of the worst hitters in Cooperstown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree.  Aparicio was a key player for the O's in the mid 60's.  Lee McPhail had a good eye for talent that came from the farm and key trades.   Aparicio was not short changed at the time.  He was well liked by the fans and his teammates.   His glove along with Brooks, Davey Johnson and Boog surely helped the O's pitchers like Palmer, McNally, Bunker, Pappas and Barber  put up great  number.   Stu Miller, Dick Hall and Harvey Haddix were great out of the pen.  A lot of that revolved around the defense of which Aparicio was a key part.

As a young O's fan I remember these guys well.  It was a treat to watch and listen to them play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Aparicio was an interesting player, a poor hitter, but a very good fielder and base runner.  He had combination of talents that would be utilized differently today.  When he came to the majors nobody had really stolen bases since the 1920s.  That's an exaggeration, but by 1945 steals were almost dead.  In '49 some guy named Bob Dillinger led the AL with 20 steals.  Aparicio led the AL his rookie year with 21. The late 40s and early 50s were more station-to-station baseball than today.

GMs and managers got kind of enamored with steals after Aparicio and Maury Wills came up, and got all mixed up and started batting guys with .311 OBPs (Aparicio's real career mark) leadoff.  Aparicio batted 1st or 2nd in almost 10,000 PAs and played 150 games a year.  But he never scored 100 runs in a season, even once.  In '59, when he finished 2nd in the MVP voting, he led the league in outs made.  He's 14th all time in outs.  But if you read things like Baseball Digest from the 1960s they thought Aparicio was a wonderful leadoff hitter.  He wasn't.  In 1966 he scored 97 runs but that was leading off every day and leading the league in PAs - per PA he scored the same number of runs as Boog or Brooks.

But... because he was a very good shortstop and a good baserunner he actually had a reasonable HOF career despite being one of the worst hitters in Cooperstown.

But not a terribly poor hitter for being a SS of the time, right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

But not a terribly poor hitter for being a SS of the time, right? 

He wasn't Mark Belanger or Ray Oyler.  

Quick query: 1945-1980, played at least 800 games at short.  47 players come up.  Aparicio was 25th in OPS+, just a little below average. 

He wasn't in the same zip code as Ernie Banks, Vern Stephens, Jim Fregosi, Eddie Joost, Pee Wee Reese, Al Dark.  Still quite a ways behind Dave Concepcion, Phil Rizzuto, Chris Speier, Bert Campaneris.  Similar to Tony Kubek, Chico Carrasquel, Freddy Patek, Bill Russell.

There are 23 shortstops in the Hall, depending on where you put John Ward.  Aparicio is 22nd in OPS+, a fraction of a point ahead of Rabbit Maranville.  We kind of laugh at Phil Rizzuto being in the Hall, but he had an OPS 50 points higher and lost three prime years to the war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aparicio was mentioned some in the Belanger documentary. The doc showed how Mark was essentially blocked by him and in spring training, Mark would ask him how he did this or that and Aparicio was reluctant to go out of his way to mentor him as he knew Belanger was a bad-ass defensively and was in competition for his job. The trade back to Chicago opened SS up and the rest is history.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

After Frank Robinson's passing last week, I went down a baseballreference.com/wiki/youtube rabbit hole that was pretty encompassing.  Of course, started with Frank Robinson but it branched off to other players from the mid 60s up until the early 70s.  

There was one player that I read up on that piqued my interest more than a lot of others and I came to learn that he was pretty pivotal for the Orioles success.  This player spent 5 years with the O's, and is a Hall of Famer.  I first heard of him when I was a kid, in the early 90s, when his jersey was represented on a giveaway tankard at Memorial Stadium that I still have which is kind of awkward as he's not in the Hall of Fame as an Oriole.

In 1966, he tied Frank for 2nd place with hits in the American League with 182.  Of course, that was during Frank's Triple Crown season, so this guy might not have provided the power but certainly rapped out hits at a solid rate that summer.

He also lead the league in stolen bases twice as an Oriole, first with 40 in one season and then 57 in the next.  He picked up two Gold Gloves, secured two All-Star berths and received MVP votes in three seasons.  In the 1966 World Series, a Series without a lot of scoring he hit .250 and chipped in two RBIs.  And for you WAR-mongers, his WAR totals were 2.5, 5.2, 4.0 4.2 and a low 0.6 in his final year.

From what I can tell, Luis Aparicio is a really overlooked player in Orioles history.  Not just from the perspective of what he did on the field, but how he ties into the history of the franchise.  The 1962 Orioles were 77-85, and then dealt Hoyt Wilhelm, Ron Hansen, Dave Nicholson and Pete Ward to the White Sox for Little Looie and Al Smith before the 1963 season.  The parallel to the Frank Robinson trade I found interesting is that the Sox seemed to think that Aparicio was over the hill and done.  He'd showed up overweight for the 1962 season, didn't have a great year (still won a Gold Glove, made both All Star Games and lead the league in steals...and caught stealing) and the Sox tried to decrease his salary.  Aparicio demanded a trade and the Sox shipped him to Baltimore.  It was a good trade for both teams as Wilhelm went on to do great things for the Sox but Aparicio seemed to have a good impact on his new team.

The Orioles bumped their win total to 86 in '63 and then 97 in 1964.  The left side of the Orioles infield in 1964 must have been a sight to behold as Brooks won the MVP and a Gold Glove and Aparicio won a Gold Glove as well.

The Orioles shipped him back to the White Sox after 1967 for...Don Buford, who'd go on to be a stud leadoff man for the '68-'72 teams.  Aparicio, IMO, played an interesting part in Orioles history as he helped shore up the defense for some really good teams and a great one in 1966.  But the piece he was traded for in '67 was super important as well.  

When searching for greatest players in Orioles history, his name doesn't come up too often.  And I'm not saying he belongs in the top 15 or even 20 (but I think you could make a case).  After Aparicio, the Orioles certainly had their share of great shortstops with guys like Belanger, Cal, and Tejada so I think he's certainly overshadowed by them.  That said, I don't think many teams could boast a Mount Rushmore of shortstops like that.  

But as far as someone who was important from a playing perspective and for what he fetched in a trade to boost the franchise into the late 60s and early 70s, Luis Aparicio seems a pretty pivotal player that often gets overlooked in Orioles history.

I remember him very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy was RoY with a .653 OPS. Was #2 in the MVP voting with a .647 OPS. 

This sport has really changed. He did lead the league in stolen bases 9 times.

P.S. I hope it's not moved quickly, but this thread should get memorialized in the Orioles History board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...