Jump to content

Mancini Trade Package


bird watcher

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Orioles who were the Trey Mancini of their decade:

2010s: Mark Trumbo
2000s: Luke Scott
1990s: Bobby Bonilla
1980s: Larry Sheets
1970s: Don Baylor
1960s: Curt Blefary
1950s: Bob Nieman
1940s: Howie Moss
1930s: George Puccinelli 
1920s: Dick Porter
1910s: Butch Schmidt
1900s: Cy Seymour
1890s: George Van Haltren
1880s: Mike Griffin

Some of the comps aren't great, but you don't always have a decade with a first baseman who sometimes played the outfield poorly and also hit quite well, but not always.

How about Harold Baines?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Frobby said:

I think a pretty good (though scary) comp for Mancini is Larry Sheets.   Though 3 full seasons plus a short call-up the year before, he was at 127 OPS+ (Mancini is at 117), 4.5 rWAR (Mancini is at 3.9 now).     Like Mancini, he was a bad outfielder (worse than Mancini, I’d say).    Both reached the majors in their age 24 season. 

Unfortunately, Sheets fell apart in his fourth full season in the majors and was never the same again.   He had an 88 OPS+ and was worth -2.6 rWAR over the remainder of his career.    

Mancini is on track for 145 OPS+. The question with any young player trending up is whether he sustains it or regresses to the mean. If he sustains it (or even close), that would put him on an entirely different level than Sheets.

Interestingly, Sheets peaked at 143 OPS+ before collapsing.

A really, really high end comp would be Edgar Martinez, who put up 74, 133, 138, 164, 100 through age 30.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Chavez Ravine said:

I think because we are in an era when teams don’t want to give up anything of real value to plug a hole at positions like that for just a couple months, anybody younger than Trey and with potential to one day be Trey counts as real value, and they are unconvinced that the current version of Trey is gonna last if they keep him. Plus if they are still in a pinch for an outfielder next year they can sign Adam Jones.

A couple months? Mancini is not a FA until 2023. He would not be a rental if traded this year or even next year.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Mancini is on track for 145 OPS+. The question with any young player trending up is whether he sustains it or regresses to the mean. If he sustains it (or even close), that would put him on an entirely different level than Sheets.

Interestingly, Sheets peaked at 143 OPS+ before collapsing.

A really, really high end comp would be Edgar Martinez, who put up 74, 133, 138, 164, 100 through age 30.

I guess those last two points are really important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, interloper said:

These are both just bad comps, I don't know why folks continue to say this. Neither player can play 1B as well, neither could hit the ball to all fields, both were more pure power hitters with lesser ability to be selective and get on base. They just aren't the same type of player as Trey at all.

Let's see... DHs, left fielders, and first basemen; all played at least a little of each.  Power hitters with career slugging marks between 460 and 480.  Listed weights between 215 and 225.  Career highs in walks of 54, 59, and 44 with Trey having worst mark of the three but makes up for that by having a little higher average.  None of them are plus fielders anywhere, although Scott was probably the best outfielder of the three and you could argue about whether Trumbo or Mancini were better first basemen.  Baserunning value for all three through age 27 was within a few runs of zero, and none of them ever stole 10 bases in a season.  None of them were MLB regulars before age 25.  8th, 9th, and 18th round picks.  All had random seasons in mid career with sub-100 OPS+es.

There are a lot more similarities here than differences.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Yes, and I didn’t mean to suggest that I expect Mancini to flatline like Sheets did.    I was just pointing out that to this point in their careers, they were pretty similar.    

It's worth nothing/watching that Sheets had his big year in 1987, the year of the obviously juiced ball.  Mancini is having his biggest year so far in what's looking like the biggest HR season in MLB history, by far.

In 1988 MLB returned the ball to a pile of mush and Sheets was never the same.  I wonder what, if anything, MLB will do to the ball in 2020?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I disagree that Trumbo is an inferior first baseman to Mancini.  It isn't as if Mancini is a good first baseman and when he has a chance to play there regularly is isn't as if Trumbo is a bad first baseman.

As for same type of player at all?  They are bat first 1B/CO/DH types with no added value on the basepaths.  Career OPS+ of the three players?  117/117/108.  I wonder how exact a match you are requiring? 

Just completely different hitters. I get that they play the same positions. If I'm a team looking for an impact bat for my playoff push, I don't know that there's a better one available than Mancini, who can basically do everything with the bat. He hits the ball hard no matter what he does with it. He will take a walk but he doesn't need to because he gets himself on base almost every game right now. He's tough, he stays healthy. Folks are severely overrating defensive value with regards to trade value. Teams are going to salivate over his controllable power+average bat in July. Will the Orioles trade him? Probably not. But to say there's no trade value is basically ridiculous. Just my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, interloper said:

Just completely different hitters. I get that they play the same positions. If I'm a team looking for an impact bat for my playoff push, I don't know that there's a better one available than Mancini, who can basically do everything with the bat. He hits the ball hard no matter what he does with it. He will take a walk but he doesn't need to because he gets himself on base almost every game right now. He's tough, he stays healthy. Folks are severely overrating defensive value with regards to trade value. Teams are going to salivate over his controllable power+average bat in July. Will the Orioles trade him? Probably not. But to say there's no trade value is basically ridiculous. Just my opinion. 

Is he a tough guy that stays healthy or did a collision with the wall last year result in his poor year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Is he a tough guy that stays healthy or did a collision with the wall last year result in his poor year?

Not quite done actually. 

There's plenty of literature out there on the changes Trey made to his hitting approach mechanically, so I don't think his struggles related to his injury last year in full.

Secondly, as usual you picked the lowest hanging fruit of my post instead of the meat of my point which was that Trey's hitting profile is very different from many of his "comps", which is largely why I think he will absolutely have trade value when you add that to his controllability and plus character. 

If you want to debate, at least debate the main point. Don't just exploit the weakest chink in the armor and act like the rest of my point therefore doesn't apply. It's getting old man. You do this so much. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

It's worth nothing/watching that Sheets had his big year in 1987, the year of the obviously juiced ball.  Mancini is having his biggest year so far in what's looking like the biggest HR season in MLB history, by far.

In 1988 MLB returned the ball to a pile of mush and Sheets was never the same.  I wonder what, if anything, MLB will do to the ball in 2020?

While I don't disagree with what you are saying, wouldn't there be an equivalent argument that his 145 OPS+ is actually more impressive in a high offense environment as it is already normalized for league average and park factors? Obviously he could disproportionately benefit from it, just as he could disproportionately be impacted if they overcorrect the other way, but I don't think it's as simple as writing off his big year as a product of a juiced ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, interloper said:

Not quite done actually. 

There's plenty of literature out there on the changes Trey made to his hitting approach mechanically, so I don't think his struggles related to his injury last year in full.

Secondly, as usual you picked the lowest hanging fruit of my post instead of the meat of my point which was that Trey's hitting profile is very different from many of his "comps", which is largely why I think he will absolutely have trade value when you add that to his controllability and plus character. 

If you want to debate, at least debate the main point. Don't just exploit the weakest chink in the armor and act like the rest of my point therefore doesn't apply. It's getting old man. You do this so much. 

When you ignore Drungo's post in it's entirety it shows me you are not interested in honest debate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

While I don't disagree with what you are saying, wouldn't there be an equivalent argument that his 145 OPS+ is actually more impressive in a high offense environment as it is already normalized for league average and park factors? Obviously he could disproportionately benefit from it, just as he could disproportionately be impacted if they overcorrect the other way, but I don't think it's as simple as writing off his big year as a product of a juiced ball.

I don't know if it's a product of the juiced ball, but there are players who disproportionately benefit (or are hurt) by changes to the playing conditions.  It might be a coincidence.  Sometimes people have career years that happen to fall in favorable conditions.  

Larry Sheets had by far his best year in the juiced ball year, but I doubt the ball was the entire difference between his .921 OPS in '87 and his .645 the next year.  It was probably a combination of a career year, the ball, health, and who knows what.

But I don't think it's hurting Mancini that he's hitting a super bounce ball this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, interloper said:

These are both just bad comps, I don't know why folks continue to say this. Neither player can play 1B as well, neither could hit the ball to all fields, both were more pure power hitters with lesser ability to be selective and get on base. They just aren't the same type of player as Trey at all.

I’ll partially agree and partially disagree.    Yes, Trey is more of an all fields hitter than Trumbo or Scott.   I’m not sure why you say he’s a more selective hitter than Scott, who carried a higher OBP than Mancini and walked at a higher rate.  As to who played 1B the best, it’s hard to say, because none of them really played 1B that much.   Trumbo has started 9 games there as an Oriole, Scott started 37, Mancini has started 96.   Not a ton to go on there.

But overall, I think they are reasonable comps, even if not exactly the same type of hitter.    They all had some value.    Will Mancini turn out to be the best of the three?    Maybe, but it’s too soon to know.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...