Jump to content

Austin Hays called up


Luke-OH

Recommended Posts

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Still might be 100+ losses next season.

I wonder if the attendance is higher when Means pitches.  I'm guessing there is no bump.

I’d be surprised if there were.   He’s not a big name yet, and his method of success is not as exciting to fans’ imagination than a guy who strikes out a ton of hitters.   But if he were to be successful a couple years in a row, there might be a bump.    I know I’d rather see a game where the team has a decent chance of winning because the pitcher is competitive.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, MurphDogg said:

In case anyone was curious about his rookie eligibility for next season,

 

 

Coming into the game tonight, Hays had 103 MLB st-bats. He managed to rack up 8 ABs tonight, so if he has more than 19 at-bats over the final 5 games, he will not be a rookie next season.

Note: this designation only matters for Rookie of the Year eligibility (and other rookie awards) and appearances on prospect lists, it doesn't have any service time implications.

Yeah, I think he's going to exhaust that eligibility in the last 5 games unless Elias shuts him down and sends him out to the AFL in order to keep him in the running next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I saw an interview where he said it.  I looked on MASN and didn't see it.  If I find it I will post it.

He said its part of getting used to the third deck.

Thanks.   It makes sense.   And one hopes that as he gains experience, the reaction time goes down a bit while the burst and routes continue to be strong.   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’d be surprised if there were.   He’s not a big name yet, and his method of success is not as exciting to fans’ imagination than a guy who strikes out a ton of hitters.   But if he were to be successful a couple years in a row, there might be a bump.    I know I’d rather see a game where the team has a decent chance of winning because the pitcher is competitive.

I did a few games he started at home. No boost at all in the games I checked. 

Last game against the Mariners was 17,540 . Day before was 22,556. Game against Texas was 8,209 but that was the Thursday game of a 4 game weekend series.Tampa Bay was 11,409 on a Saturday, day before and after were 14,762 and 13,287. 11,659 against KC on a Monday. Day after was 11.826. 16,299 on a Wednesday against the Yankees. Prior two days was 20,151 and 17,201.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Probably not.    Let’s enjoy this while it lasts, though.    

One thing is sure, Hays is faster than I’d realized, and fast enough for CF.    His sprint speed is 28.7 ft/sec, which is pretty much the median for a CF.    My sense is he’s still learning some of the nuances of the position.    He’s a little slow to recognize balls that are hit shallow and has a slow first step in that direction, but he’s aggressive and able to make up for it.    No reason he can’t stick in CF for several years.    

He's always had that and one of the reasons why scouts initially thought he profiled better at the corners. Now that we have his data under statcast, we see he can handle CF just fine, despite his slow reaction times.

Defensive Statcast #s:
Reaction: -1.3 feet
Burst: 0.4 feet
Route: 0.6 feet 
Feet vs average: -0.3 (putting him slightly below average but close enought to average) 
Expected catch%: 86
Actual catch %: 88 (+2)
Outs above average: 1

These numbers tell me that he's right around average defensively for a center fielder and there's no reason not to believe he can't get better as he gets used to major league stadiums and hitters.

 

 

  • Upvote 2
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

He's always had that and one of the reasons why scouts initially thought he profiled better at the corners. Now that we have his data under statcast, we see he can handle CF just fine, despite his slow reaction times.

Defensive Statcast #s:
Reaction: -1.3 feet
Burst: 0.4 feet
Route: 0.6 feet 
Feet vs average: -0.3 (putting him slightly below average but close enought to average) 
Expected catch%: 86
Actual catch %: 88 (+2)
Outs above average: 1

These numbers tell me that he's right around average defensively for a center fielder and there's no reason not to believe he can't get better as he gets used to major league stadiums and hitters.

 

 

But will he hit better in the majors?  Last two years has not been great offensively in the minors. I know he has had injury issues. .235 average in 2017 and .248 this year. OBP in 2018 was .266 and this year was .304. His K rate was about 1 out of 4 times at bat at Norfolk this year. Do you think he was also walk more in the majors? 68 walks in 1324 AB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

But will he hit better in the majors?  Last two years has not been great offensively in the minors. I know he has had injury issues. .235 average in 2017 and .248 this year. OBP in 2018 was .266 and this year was .304. His K rate was about 1 out of 4 times at bat at Norfolk this year. Do you think he was also walk more in the majors? 68 walks in 1324 AB's.

Hays has had a pretty weird path the last 3 years.    It’s pretty clear to me that he can hit well enough to stick as a CF, so long as he’s playing decent defense.    Worst case, he’s probably a Jonathan Schoop level hitter who can play a decent CF.    Best case, he’s an Adam Jones type.    The guy has a good bit of zing in his bat.    It’s just a matter of how his plate discipline develops.    I’m not talking about walks so much, as the ability to lay off the pitches he really can’t hit.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Hays has had a pretty weird path the last 3 years.    It’s pretty clear to me that he can hit well enough to stick as a CF, so long as he’s playing decent defense.    Worst case, he’s probably a Jonathan Schoop level hitter who can play a decent CF.    Best case, he’s an Adam Jones type.    The guy has a good bit of zing in his bat.    It’s just a matter of how his plate discipline develops.    I’m not talking about walks so much, as the ability to lay off the pitches he really can’t hit.   

He struck out four times last eve I think. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

But will he hit better in the majors?  Last two years has not been great offensively in the minors. I know he has had injury issues. .235 average in 2017 and .248 this year. OBP in 2018 was .266 and this year was .304. His K rate was about 1 out of 4 times at bat at Norfolk this year. Do you think he was also walk more in the majors? 68 walks in 1324 AB's.

I think he's a much better hitter when he's healthy, settled, and feeling good. He's having pretty good PAs right now at the big league level. He's crushing fastballs so I imagine he'll start to see an adjustment by pitchers to throw more offspeed pitches  in the future. That will be where we'll know whether he can make that adjustment at the big league level because that's what his struggles were on in the minors. 

Remember, this guy was a consensus top 100 prospect at one time and has a lot of talent. Most of his struggles were when he was trying to come back from time off due to freak injuries.

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Philip said:

These last few comments have been mildly disappointing. I thought we had a Pillar that could hit, or a Cain who is young. Now it seems at best we have Adam Jones, an average glove and good bat but a lot OBP because he never walks. I loved AJ-and still do- but I was hoping Hays would be a different level.

Adam Jones was great. Schoop was good. Hays may never be either of them. Stay healthy, he'll do ok. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Philip said:

These last few comments have been mildly disappointing. I thought we had a Pillar that could hit, or a Cain who is young. Now it seems at best we have Adam Jones, an average glove and good bat but a lot OBP because he never walks. I loved AJ-and still do- but I was hoping Hays would be a different level.

Have you looked at his minor league stats?  Have you read the scouting reports?

Also, having a Jones type career is nothing to be disappointed about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...