Jump to content

Infield (and DH) 2020... Who ya got?


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

I'm going to give what I think will happen first and then what I want to happen.

C- Sisco/Severino

1B- Davis/Mancini

2B- Alberto/Wilkerson

SS- Villar

3B- Ruiz/Alberto

I think Nunez could get some looks, but the OF starts as Santander, Hays, Mancini with Mancini getting some time at 1B. I think Davis stays on the roster for the first month or so and then, he's jettisoned when the team brings up Mountcastle. Then, Mountcastle either plays LF with Santander in RF and Mancini at 1B or Mountcastle is at 1B if he can't prove himself in the OF defensively at Norfolk.

What I'd like to see is:

C- Severino/Sisco

1B- Mancini

2B- Alberto

SS- Villar (even with a 4 WAR season, i think he's value is greater to the Orioles with no clear option at SS)

3B- Ruiz

DH- Nunez (with some time at 3B - I hope he can work heavily on defense at 3B over the winter and in spring. If not a total liability, I'd like to see him get more and more ABs at 3B to open 1B/DH for Mountcastle and Mancini, thus opening an extra outfield spot for Diaz to grab when he proves himself ready.)

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Davis is gone. I think Nunez or Mancini will also be traded to make way for Mountcastle. Amazingly, we still have 3 RH DH/1B... Mancini, Nunez, Mountcastle. We only need 2. 

I expect Villar to be gone as well. I do not expect Martin to make the team. 

Excited to see how it all pans out. I 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, jtschrei said:

I think Davis is gone. I think Nunez or Mancini will also be traded to make way for Mountcastle. Amazingly, we still have 3 RH DH/1B... Mancini, Nunez, Mountcastle. We only need 2. 

I expect Villar to be gone as well. I do not expect Martin to make the team. 

Excited to see how it all pans out. I 

.Me thinks your dreaming! They have already said that they've given Davis a workout plan for the offseason. They are not cutting him and nobody would take him if you agreed to eat all of his salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

.Me thinks your dreaming! They have already said that they've given Davis a workout plan for the offseason. They are not cutting him and nobody would take him if you agreed to eat all of his salary.

To be fair, they only said that Davis would be with the team in spring training.  Elias did not commit to anything beyond that.  I do expect Davis to start the season with the team.  I'm hopeful that they trade Mancini, Villar and Givens, if possible, and that when they decide Mountcastle is ready, that they hit the ejector button on Davis.  I don't think that the resulting roster would be significantly worse than 2019. 

Our 2019 record, it seems to me, was primarily the result of the pitching.  Any improvement or lack thereof will also be dependent on the pitching.  I hope that at some point Akin and Kremer prove to be competent starting pitchers at the ML level.  I also hope that Harvey will prove to be better than Givens.

Lotta "hope" in this post.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the objective of the team is to get players good enough to compete in 22\23 then some changes have to be made. Winning 54 games is too many. Need to get down in the 45 range to have a good chance at 1-1. 1-2 is not an option. It’s like playing for the wildcard and not the division chanpionship. That being the objective, they need to part ways with any player who has more than a + WAR value for more than one season. That means find someway to move Villar, Mancini, Bundy, Givens, and Castro. Send any players with an option back to the minors and tell them they need to work on their defense or change positions. That way Mounty, Sisco, Stewart and Hays are not on the big club. Davis stays. Analytics will help him return to his former self.

C    Severino\Wynns
1B    Davis\Nunez
2B    Alberto
3B     Ruiz
SS    Martin
DH    Nunez\Davis
UTI    Drew Jackson        Can play all Infield positions and 5th OF. He’s available (.209 BA in PCL)

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roch had this to say:

Quote

What do you think of this (insert opening day lineup prediction)?
Impossible to offer an exact starting nine without knowing the exact construction of the roster. I can make assumptions, like putting Anthony Santander in left field, Austin Hays in center and Trey Mancini in right. I can stick Chris Davis at first base, knowing that he also might be on the bench. I can make Jonathan Villar the shortstop, assuming that Richie Martin is assigned to Triple-A Norfolk and also knowing that Villar is a trade chip. Hanser Alberto at second base? Maybe. Unless he’s at third base. Renato Núñez is the favorite to get most of the at-bats at designated hitter. Chance Sisco and Pedro Severino could be the catching tandem again. Adley Rutschman won’t be in Baltimore. That’s one of the few certainties.

https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2019/10/because-you-asked---i-want-to-believe.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming Villar and/or Alberto are not traded, I think the infield is pretty much set except for 3B. Maybe they give Ruiz another year to develop there, maybe Alberto plays there (and Wilkerson at 2nd), or maybe Bannon surprises and grasps the position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/9/2019 at 10:32 AM, OldNewGuy said:

If the objective of the team is to get players good enough to compete in 22\23 then some changes have to be made. Winning 54 games is too many. Need to get down in the 45 range to have a good chance at 1-1. 1-2 is not an option. It’s like playing for the wildcard and not the division chanpionship. That being the objective, they need to part ways with any player who has more than a + WAR value for more than one season. That means find someway to move Villar, Mancini, Bundy, Givens, and Castro. Send any players with an option back to the minors and tell them they need to work on their defense or change positions. That way Mounty, Sisco, Stewart and Hays are not on the big club. Davis stays. Analytics will help him return to his former self.

C    Severino\Wynns
1B    Davis\Nunez
2B    Alberto
3B     Ruiz
SS    Martin
DH    Nunez\Davis
UTI    Drew Jackson        Can play all Infield positions and 5th OF. He’s available (.209 BA in PCL)

I don't know about Jackson or Wynns, but I think you are right that we should expect some changes from the current team. See what turns up in the Rule 5 and whatever we get back from Villar and go from there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Martin is going to get the everyday ABs at SS when Villar is traded, and he should. We have no better options at SS, literally zero currently. Lol, we don’t need to send Martin down to put up a certain stat line to predict what he can do up here. We can actually watch him play up here. We’re a 100+ loss team. Martin is in the same boat as Stewart. It’s sink or swim time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Martin is going to get the everyday ABs at SS when Villar is traded, and he should. We have no better options at SS, literally zero currently. Lol, we don’t need to send Martin down to put up a certain stat line to predict what he can do up here. We can actually watch him play up here. We’re a 100+ loss team. Martin is in the same boat as Stewart. It’s sink or swim time. 

I think Elias acquire another  SS this off season.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's fine, but I would personally prefer having Cowser and Adley taking tons of pitches back-to-back before Gunnar further punishes the opposing starting pitcher with high exit velo barrels. 
    • I was going to say pretty much the same thing about Cowser in my post, but left out my thoughts to keep the post more Gunnar-centric. But I totally agree that Cowser fits the best as this team's leadoff hitter, especially since Holliday doesn't look like he's going to make an impact offensively as early as most of us thought heading into the season.  Going back to last season, I've said Cowser has the best mix of patience, hit tool, power, and speed to be a great leadoff hitter. The strikeouts are most likely always going to be high with him, but he has .380-.400+ OBP makeup, and having someone like that hitting leadoff with Adley and Gunnar hitting directly behind Cowser is going to set things up for an elite offense which is much more dynamic and less one-dimensional than the what we've seen up until this point. Cowser Adley Gunnar Westburg O'Hearn Santander Mountcastle Is an ideal top 7 against RHP for right now, with Kjerstad (replacing Hays) and Mayo (essentially replacing Mateo and bumping Westburg to 2B) making the lineup legitimately scary within the next couple months. Mullins and Hays need to be phased out, with Santander and Mountcastle not far behind if those two continue struggling and not reaching base enough to justify hitting in the middle of the order.
    • A lot of teams (likely driven by analytics) are putting their best overall hitter at 2 (like the Yankees batting Soto 2, and the Dodgers batting Shohei 2) to maximize ABs while guaranteeing that a high-OBP guy is batting in front of him to give him opportunities with men on base.  That's probably what we want.  It seems logical considering how thoroughly debunked small-ball in the first inning has been.  Rutschman at 3 is fine.
    • Realistically I think Adley as the leadoff guy is the best lineup for us but if he has trouble batting leadoff in half the games because he can't get his catcher's gear off fast enough then I get it.   Cowser has continued to be incredibly patient, and if Adley can't be our leadoff guy then Cowser is probably our next best option.  Of course Cowser also hits a lot of bombs, so it'd be interesting if he goes on another heater.   If Cowser gets off the schneid then Cowser leadoff and Gunnar at 2 could be incredibly potent.  I don't think Cowser is actually playing that badly, he's just been running into some bad luck.  And he's starting to wake up a little bit anyway.
    • Agreed, appreciate the stats. Gunnar isn't a leadoff hitter - he's a prototypical #3 hitter or cleanup hitter. Hyde writes poor lineups, and Gunnar hitting leadoff has been one of the consistent problems with the offense this season. Gunnar hitting mostly solo shots is both a consequence and reflection of this offense's flaws - the O's have too many low-OBP hitters in the lineup (hitting in less-than-optimal spots for the most part) and are too reliant on solo homers to generate runs. At least Hyde has started hitting Westburg leadoff against LHP, which is progress, but Hyde is way too stubborn and too slow to make the correct adjustments. He's very similar to Buck Showalter in that respect.  Anyway, I look forward to Hyde waking up and moving Gunnar down to #3/#4 against RHP.  
    • While the return on the Tettleton trade wasn't ideal, 1: I don't think you can really expect a 30 year old catcher to put up a career year and then follow it up with another one, and 2: we had Chris Hoiles who played quite well for us following Tettleton's departure.  If we had forward thinking GMs we probably would split them at C and give them DH/1B/OF games on their non catching days, which is what Detroit did with Tettleton to prolong his career after 1992.  (He was basically the same hitter from 1993-1995 but he stopped catching with regularity so his WAR was much lower.)   The Davis trade was so completely undefensible on every level, not the least of which because we already had a player who was at least as good as Davis was on the team, but he didn't fit the stereotypical batting profile of a 1B.  At least today teams wouldn't be so quick to dismiss a 10 HR first baseman if he's got an OBP of .400.
    • The Glenn Davis trade was so bad it overshadowed another really bad trade in team history. The Orioles traded Mickey Tettleton that same offseason for Jeff Robinson in part because Tettleton had an off year in 1990 with a .223 batting average and a .381 slugging percentage. Except Tettleton drew 116 walks making his OBP .376 and his OPS+ was 116. Jeff Robinson was coming off a 5.96 ERA in 145 innings pitched. I have no idea what the team was thinking with this trade. Robinson did manage to lower his ERA in 1991 to 5.18 his only Orioles season. There's no way this trade is made today in the age of analytics. Tettleton meanwhile put up 171 home runs and an .859 OPS for the remainder of his career. 😬 Just a bad trade that doesn't get talked about enough thanks to Glenn Davis.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...