Jump to content

Nostalgia on Chris Ray


Barnaby Graves

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Barnaby Graves said:

 

I neglected to mention Ray's involvement in the Mother's Day Massacre (with an assist from Danys Baez.)

 

 

 

1 hour ago, weams said:

 

I was being kind, and chose not to post exactly that. 

 

 

 

55 minutes ago, Barnaby Graves said:

 

We are the sum of our positives and negatives, my friend.

It wasn't his fault anyway, he was in the bullpen on his fifth Bloody Mary thinking that it was a vacation day when Sam Perlozzo said, "What in the wild world o' sports is going on here? I can't allow Jeremy Guthrie to toss a shutout in under 100 pitches." We found a lot of creative ways to lose.

 

o

 

This sentiment/point is somewhat reminiscent of the whole situation with the late Bill Buckner and Game 6 of the 1986 World Series ........ Buckner (like Chris Ray 21 years later), should have been celebrating the win with his teammates long before the final nail in the coffin was hammered in.

 

Historically, the infamous Bill Buckner play is one of the most overblown and misinterpreted issues of all-time ........ to this day, there are people who still believe that the Red Sox were winning the game when Buckner made that error, and that the Mets scored 2 runs on said play.

 

The reality is that the Red Sox had already blown a seemingly insurmountable lead (2 outs, a 2-run lead, and nobody on base) in such a horrific fashion ........ 3 consecutive singles ceded by their best reliever (Calvin Schiraldi), and then the wild pitch by their 2nd-best reliever (Bob Stanley) WHICH GAVE THE METS THE TYING RUN, subsequently taking all of the pressure off of them. Even if Dave Stapleton were on the field and had made that play, it would not have saved the game for the Red Sox ........ THE GAME WAS ALREADY TIED, and the Red Sox, at that point, had emotionally just had their lungs ripped out.

Would the Red Sox still have had a chance to win that game had Stapleton been on the field, made the play, and the game went to the 11th inning ??? Technically, yes. But if I were a bookie laying odds on that game at that precise moment (right after Stapleton made the play and extended the game into an 11th inning), I would be laying the odds heavily in favor of the Mets.

 

Buckner's error (and/or McNamara's failure to have inserted Dave Stapleton as a defensive replacement for Buckner) was just the final nail in the coffin of what was a disastrous collapse by the Red Sox as a team overall in that game.

 

o

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OFFNY said:

 

 

 

 

o

 

This sentiment/point is somewhat reminiscent of the whole situation with the late Bill Buckner and Game 6 of the 1986 World Series ........ Buckner (like Chris Ray 21 years later), should have been celebrating the win with his teammates long before the final nail in the coffin was hammered in.

 

Historically, the infamous Bill Buckner play is one of the most overblown and misinterpreted issues of all-time ........ to this day, there are people who still believe that the Red Sox were winning the game when Buckner made that error, and that the Mets scored 2 runs on said play.

 

The reality is that the Red Sox had already blown a seemingly insurmountable lead (2 outs, a 2-run lead, and nobody on base) in such a horrific fashion ........ 3 consecutive singles ceded by their best reliever (Calvin Schiraldi), and then the wild pitch by their 2nd-best reliever (Bob Stanley) WHICH GAVE THE METS THE TYING RUN, subsequently taking all of the pressure off of them. Even if Dave Stapleton were on the field and had made that play, it would not have saved the game for the Red Sox ........ THE GAME WAS ALREADY TIED, and the Red Sox, at that point, had emotionally just had their lungs ripped out.

Would the Red Sox still have had a chance to win that game had Stapleton been on the field, made the play, and the game went to the 11th inning ??? Technically, yes. But if I were a bookie laying odds on that game at that precise moment (right after Stapleton made the play and extended the game into an 11th inning), I would be laying the odds heavily in favor of the Mets.

Buckner's error (and/or McNamara's failure to have inserted Dave Stapleton as a defensive replacement for Buckner) was just the final nail in the coffin of what was a disastrous collapse by the Red Sox as a team overall in that game.

 

o

Great post and you're right, very comparable situation.  Ray's less innocent in that, he's a pitcher, he should've been expected to pull that off.  Or, pulling that off was at least in the job description.  Buckner was like a fish out of water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OFFNY said:

 

 

 

 

o

 

This sentiment/point is somewhat reminiscent of the whole situation with the late Bill Buckner and Game 6 of the 1986 World Series ........ Buckner (like Chris Ray 21 years later), should have been celebrating the win with his teammates long before the final nail in the coffin was hammered in.

 

Historically, the infamous Bill Buckner play is one of the most overblown and misinterpreted issues of all-time ........ to this day, there are people who still believe that the Red Sox were winning the game when Buckner made that error, and that the Mets scored 2 runs on said play.

 

The reality is that the Red Sox had already blown a seemingly insurmountable lead (2 outs, a 2-run lead, and nobody on base) in such a horrific fashion ........ 3 consecutive singles ceded by their best reliever (Calvin Schiraldi), and then the wild pitch by their 2nd-best reliever (Bob Stanley) WHICH GAVE THE METS THE TYING RUN, subsequently taking all of the pressure off of them. Even if Dave Stapleton were on the field and had made that play, it would not have saved the game for the Red Sox ........ THE GAME WAS ALREADY TIED, and the Red Sox, at that point, had emotionally just had their lungs ripped out.

Would the Red Sox still have had a chance to win that game had Stapleton been on the field, made the play, and the game went to the 11th inning ??? Technically, yes. But if I were a bookie laying odds on that game at that precise moment (right after Stapleton made the play and extended the game into an 11th inning), I would be laying the odds heavily in favor of the Mets.

 

Buckner's error (and/or McNamara's failure to have inserted Dave Stapleton as a defensive replacement for Buckner) was just the final nail in the coffin of what was a disastrous collapse by the Red Sox as a team overall in that game.

 

o

But that is no where near as fun as blaming it all on one guy and one botched play, and we are talking Red Sox fans.  To be fair though, most people have just seen the ball go throw his legs for the past 30 years and blame him with no back story because that is all they see on tv.

****The Buckners actually live 10 minutes from me, though I have never met them and his wife Jody has spent the last 30 years protecting him from the media because of this single play before he passed on Memorial Day this year at 69 due to dementia****

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Enjoy Terror said:

I mean, I’m sure he’s a nice person but his 6.44 ERA (third worst for qualified relievers in the entire sport), and -0.9 fWAR were horrid. Every time I flipped on the TV Baez was in the middle of giving away the game.

I tried to get the nickname "Butane" to stick.

His stuff was inflammable when he was with the O's, a tiny little spark and he'd blow up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Barnaby Graves said:

I neglected to mention Ray's involvement in the Mother's Day Massacre (with an assist from Danys Baez).

In the annals of horrible blown losses, those two games might be one-two in my mind (with the Mothers’ Day game being worse).   Another one that sticks out in my mind is BJ Ryan coughing up a walk-off to David Ortiz on June 2, 2005, after the O’s had taken a 4-3 lead in the top of the 9th.    Walk-off blown saves vs. NY or Boston are as bad as it gets!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Frobby said:

 

In the annals of horrible blown losses, those two games might be one-two in my mind (with the Mothers Day game being worse.) Another one that sticks out in my mind is BJ Ryan coughing up a walk-off to David Ortiz on June 2nd of 2005, after the Orioles had taken a 4-3 lead in the top of the 9th. Walk-off, blown saves vs. the Yankee of the Red Sox are as bad as it gets !!!

 

o

 

 

In less than 24 hours, Oriole fans went from Heaven to Hell in 2 consecutive games against the Red Sox in 2009.

In the first game the Orioles were losing by a score of 10-1, and came back to win by a score of 11-10. The best part of that game was when the Red Sox laughingly walked off of the field when there were only 2 outs in the bottom of the 6th inning ........ they had a huge lead at the time (9-1), and they were able to laugh at themselves for their blunder (but they were certainly not laughing at the end of the game.)

 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/BAL/BAL200906300.shtml 

 

 

The very next day, Brad Bergesen threw 8 innings of 1-run ball and left the game with a 5-1 lead ........ but the Orioles returned the previous day's favor, and allowed the Red Sox to score 4 runs in the top of the 9th inning to tie the game. The Bostonians eventually won it in the 12th.

 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/BAL/BAL200907010.shtml

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@OFFNY I was talking about Game 6 '86 with a buddy recently.  We both commented on that the game was already tied and how people seem to overlook that.

Also wildly overlooked in that inning is the passed ball/wild pitch that allowed Mitchell to score the tying run.  Bob Stanley and Rich Gedman should have been buying Buckner beers (say that 10 times fast) for years after that.  

But what's never mentioned is that even if Buckner cleanly fields that ball there's no guarantee that he makes an out.  If you look at the replay, Stanley breaks towards first to cover but when the camera pans towards Buckner for the famous moment, he's not anywhere close.  And there's also no guarantee that Buckner beats the speedy Mookie Wilson to the bag, too.  I've always felt that there's a very good chance that Wilson either beats Stanley to first or beats Buckner to first if Stanley doesn't cover.  

Anyway...I liked Chris Ray.  I liked the wild, violent delivery.  It was a bummer he didn't last long.

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

@OFFNY I was talking about Game 6 '86 with a buddy recently.  We both commented on that the game was already tied and how people seem to overlook that.

Also wildly overlooked in that inning is the passed ball/wild pitch that allowed Mitchell to score the tying run.  Bob Stanley and Rich Gedman should have been buying Buckner beers (say that 10 times fast) for years after that.  

But what's never mentioned is that even if Buckner cleanly fields that ball there's no guarantee that he makes an out.  If you look at the replay, Stanley breaks towards first to cover but when the camera pans towards Buckner for the famous moment, he's not anywhere close.  And there's also no guarantee that Buckner beats the speedy Mookie Wilson to the bag, too.  I've always felt that there's a very good chance that Wilson either beats Stanley to first or beats Buckner to first if Stanley doesn't cover.  

Anyway...I liked Chris Ray.  I liked the wild, violent delivery.  It was a bummer he didn't last long.

 

You are 100% and don't forget about Calvin Schiraldi who melted down in the tenth inning as well. To be fair Schiraldi might have been getting tired as he was starting his third inning of pitching in that tenth inning. Except he was radioactive that whole series posting a 13.50 ERA.

And Alex Gonzalez should be sending a portion of his pension check to Steve Bartman. He booted a surefire double play ball that would have prevented that 8 run rally from the Marlins in game 6 of the 2003 NLCS. And no one ever mentions Gonzalez's error. Luckily for Bartman the Cubs have no won the series even though he was never to blame in the first place. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

You are 100% and don't forget about Calvin Schiraldi who melted down in the tenth inning as well. To be fair Schiraldi might have been getting tired as he was starting his third inning of pitching in that tenth inning. Except he was radioactive that whole series posting a 13.50 ERA.

And Alex Gonzalez should be sending a portion of his pension check to Steve Bartman. He booted a surefire double play ball that would have prevented that 8 run rally from the Marlins in game 6 of the 2003 NLCS. And no one ever mentions Gonzalez's error. Luckily for Bartman the Cubs have no won the series even though he was never to blame in the first place. 

Yep, we talked about Bartman, too.  Cubs made every overture to bring that guy back and apologize, he's refused every time.  Good for him.  That inning was WAY out of hand when that went down.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Yep, we talked about Bartman, too.  Cubs made every overture to bring that guy back and apologize, he's refused every time.  Good for him.  That inning was WAY out of hand when that went down.  

If that inning ever happened to the Orioles in the playoffs, I probably would have ended up shooting heroin into my veins. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Barnaby Graves said:

I neglected to mention Ray's involvement in the Mother's Day Massacre (with an assist from Danys Baez).

It's unfortunate to remember someone for their worst moments, but when someone mentions Chris Ray my mind flashes to the MDM before they finish "Ray".  That was in the era when my kids were just being born and I clung to the single guy notion of trying to watch almost every game.  After the MDM I didn't turn on the O's for probably two weeks.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
    • I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...