Jump to content

Bundy traded to Angels for Isaac Mattson, Kyle Bradish, Zach Peek, and Kyle Brnovich


MurphDogg

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Frobby said:

One takeaway I have from these trades is that Elias thinks our next window is pretty far away.    The guys we are acquiring are mostly very far away from the majors.    

I don't see that from this trade.    The O's next contending rotation is probably Rodriguez, DL Hall, Means, Baumann and Kremer.   That is about two years away. 2022.

What this trade tells me is that Elias had no faith in Bundy improving his trade value by July. He sold low because he didn't think it would get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

What did you really think a guy like Bundy was worth?  Why would anyone give a top flight prospect of any value for a pitcher like Bundy?

Switch places.  If you're working on a trade for Bundy and are the Angels GM, are you even considering giving up anyone in your top 10?  Top 15?  What's a career 4.67 career ERA (and climbing) worth, also taking into consideration that his fastball velocity is 92 on a good day?  Why would you give up significant value for him?  

You wouldn’t. I’d rather have kept him. That’s why it looks like a salary dump to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

What did you really think a guy like Bundy was worth?  Why would anyone give a top flight prospect of any value for a pitcher like Bundy?

Switch places.  If you're working on a trade for Bundy and are the Angels GM, are you even considering giving up anyone in your top 10?  Top 15?  What's a career 4.67 career ERA (and climbing) worth, also taking into consideration that his fastball velocity is 92 on a good day?  Why would you give up significant value for him?  

I was hoping a team like the Angels would have given up someone around #15 and someone around #30.

And the reason is they have Trout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Philip said:

Holy cow.

I have to digest this. So far my main reaction is that we traded for a guy that we could’ve gotten for free in the rule five draft.

If this guy has a future value of only 35, and he is the headliner, the other three guys are throw-ins, non-prospects, most probably. Which means we traded one of our only assets for a guy we could have picked up for free in the rule five draft. Unless I’m missing something pretty serious, that was bad logic.

am I missing something?

What is your basis for calling the 3 pitchers non-prospects?
 

Also in response to your Rule 5 analysis, would you have used the #2 pick on him? Would he be available in the second round at #2? Do you think he is worth keeping on the O’s roster the entire year?

I’m not sure what facts in this trade are upsetting you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

I don't see that from this trade.    The O's next contending rotation is probably Rodriguez, DL Hall, Means, Baumann and Kremer.   That is about two years away. 2022.

What this trade tells me is that Elias had no faith in Bundy improving his trade value by July. He sold low because he didn't think it would get better.

He was wise to sell now IMO. Bundy showed some improvement but he's probably a non tender next year so you might as well get something while you can. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

I don't see that from this trade.    The O's next contending rotation is probably Rodriguez, DL Hall, Means, Baumann and Kremer.   That is about two years away. 2022.

What this trade tells me is that Elias had no faith in Bundy improving his trade value by July. He sold low because he didn't think it would get better.

I don’t know that he sold low.   We got some interesting pitchers here.   But I do hope Bundy thrives with the Angels.    Good guy, and I kind’ve like the Halos.    

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, gtown said:

That's not good.  I'm not a believer in quantity over quality, but this is a case of us having to trust in Elias... or not.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

No according to Sports Illustrated.

They won the World Series in 2017, when SI predicted.

But I thought their 2015 playoff appearance was at least a year ahead of schedule.   It was two years removed from a 111 loss season and one year removed from a 92 loss season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The Orioles starters absolutely have to do better against the Royals. You can't ask this bullpen to pitch most of the game and expect to win. Right now I probably trust Coulombe the most and Soto (which I never would have guessed a couple weeks back). Perez has been really shaky recently to the point I'm wondering is he nursing a tired arm or minor injuey. Cano hasn't been good as well and O's really need him to get back into a groove. And Akin is usually trustworthy, but only starting the inning clean.
    • I'll be working at Gate F.  If you're getting drunk at Pickles before the game and then walk through the closest gate, you'll walk right past me.
    • What happens if it rains all day?
    • For me, bullpen strategy in a short series is developing a core principle or two and working backwards from that. That’s usually going to involve how we want to pitch to their best guys. In this case, there’s really no way to game Witt. He doesn’t have any discernible platoon splits, and in fact he destroyed RHPs this year. He doesn’t even have any particular pitches he struggles against. If you have to pitch to him, power stuff seems to be the way to go — if he has any weakness, it seems like maybe it’s LHPs who can attack him with high velocity and some sort of off speed weapon (Skubal, Framber, Kikuchi, EdRod, Rodon, Sale, Gore). So maybe you’re looking at Soto and Perez there, although you really just shouldn’t be pitching to him at all if you can avoid it. Beyond him, the other “hero” is Salvador Perez. And that’s from where I’d be building out my strategy. He probably should not see a LHP all series. There’s a fairly meaningful career platoon split there (109 wRC+ to 101), and it’s been more pronounced this year (130 to 110). I would be looking to force feed him ABs against Cano (1/4 with a single), Webb (0/2 with two Ks), and Dominguez. He’s always had trouble with offspeed stuff, which means Webb might be the preferred option. They’ve faced a ton of LH starters in the last week or so, but it seems like their preferred lineup against RHPs stacks LH hitters like Melendez and Gurriel behind Perez. Melendez is awful against LHPs, so ideally Perez might be the last hitter that the starters see. They pinch hit very liberally in platoon fashion in the bottom half of the lineup, so if you brought in someone like Akin behind the starter, they might very well hit for him. Forcing them to do that erases a lot of the platoon stacking in the late innings, so you could subsequently bring in a RHP to pitch to Perez without the same concern that they’d be exposed after him.    In sum, I think the ideal attack plan is for Burnes/Eflin/Kremer to see Perez three times, then bring in Akin or Cionel to pitch to the bottom of what will likely be a lefty-heavy lineup. They’ll potentially PH there, but that’s okay because none of those guys are that good. You then go to one of the RHPs for the top of the lineup, which it seems will consist of Pham, Witt (pitch around), and Perez. Then back to Coulombe or Soto for the bottom of the lineup again.
    • I have two tickets to Game 1 of the WC which I cannot use due to work travel.  Section 352, row 4, seats 9 & 10.  Asking $70 total for the two.  Paid $205 to the Orioles as a season plan member.   PM me if interested.  Paypal preferred.    
    • Can't make game 1. I'll be at game 2...last time I was at a playoff game at Camden, we beat Scherzer and the Tigers.
    • He should be taking fly balls all winter.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...