Jump to content

2019 MLB Winter Meetings Grande Thread


weams

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Isn’t Cozart a good example of why it wasn’t smart to pay Villar $10 million?

He is a good example of why it might not make sense to sign Villar to a 3/$38M deal, not a 1/$10M deal. Cozart was entering his age 32 season when he signed that deal and he had consistently been a 2 WAR player in the 4 years before his really good age 31 season. Villar is only entering his age 29 season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Isn’t Cozart a good example of why it wasn’t smart to pay Villar $10 million?

Not at all.  Cozart is a bad multi year contract that was hamstringing his teams ability to make another bad signing.  I would contend that holding Villar for the chance at acquiring a prospect who could accumulate even 2 bWAR is worth it. 

To be completely cynical I doubt the $10 million going into the owners pocket is going to give us that return on investment.  To be less cynical I doubt that $ going back into player development is going to return that investment.  Maybe if it goes into the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

Not at all.  Cozart is a bad multi year contract that was hamstringing his teams ability to make another bad signing.  I would contend that holding Villar for the chance at acquiring a prospect who could accumulate even 2 bWAR is worth it. 

To be completely cynical I doubt the $10 million going into the owners pocket is going to give us that return on investment.  To be less cynical I doubt that $ going back into player development is going to return that investment.  Maybe if it goes into the draft.

We got a prospect for him though. Would paying him $5 million for a half season be worth some perceived chance at a better prospect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We got a prospect for him though. Would paying him $5 million for a half season be worth some perceived chance at a better prospect?

It depends on how many $5 million units Orioles' ownership have earmarked for gambling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question about how they calculate the luxury tax.  I know they don’t factor in deferments and take the yearly average.  But how does the following work?  Howie Kendrick signed a two year/10.5M deal.  But the second is a team option.  His first year is 4M, his second is 6.5M. They owe him $2.5M if they don’t exercise the option.  So he’s guaranteed $6.5M.  What is his number for luxury tax purposes?  I know you weren’t expecting math, but is it $6.5M or $5.25M or $4M?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...looks like we all might need to lower our trade expectations for Mancini. Salaries are almost identical and Mancini’s under contract for an extra year, but Mazara is three years younger. 

White Sox acquired OF Nomar Mazara from the Rangers for OF Steele Walker.

This swap was agreed to late Tuesday night at the Winter Meetings in San Diego and has been made official following the necessary medical record review. Mazara posted a mostly underwhelming .268/.318/.469 batting line with 19 home runs and 66 RBI over 116 games for Texas in 2019 and has yet to hit more than 20 home runs in a major league season, but he is just 24 years old and could maybe blossom with a change of scenery. He also drew reported trade interest from the Cardinals, Diamondbacks, Marlins, and Tigers.

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildbillhiccup said:

...looks like we all might need to lower our trade expectations for Mancini. Salaries are almost identical and Mancini’s under contract for an extra year, but Mazara is three years younger. 

White Sox acquired OF Nomar Mazara from the Rangers for OF Steele Walker.

This swap was agreed to late Tuesday night at the Winter Meetings in San Diego and has been made official following the necessary medical record review. Mazara posted a mostly underwhelming .268/.318/.469 batting line with 19 home runs and 66 RBI over 116 games for Texas in 2019 and has yet to hit more than 20 home runs in a major league season, but he is just 24 years old and could maybe blossom with a change of scenery. He also drew reported trade interest from the Cardinals, Diamondbacks, Marlins, and Tigers.

 

 

Sure it might take away a landing spot, but I still think Mancini is more closely tied with Castellanos. It just depends if there enough of a market. I like the idea of potentially having the best available bat and relief arm come trade deadline time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, wildbillhiccup said:

...looks like we all might need to lower our trade expectations for Mancini. Salaries are almost identical and Mancini’s under contract for an extra year, but Mazara is three years younger. 

White Sox acquired OF Nomar Mazara from the Rangers for OF Steele Walker.

This swap was agreed to late Tuesday night at the Winter Meetings in San Diego and has been made official following the necessary medical record review. Mazara posted a mostly underwhelming .268/.318/.469 batting line with 19 home runs and 66 RBI over 116 games for Texas in 2019 and has yet to hit more than 20 home runs in a major league season, but he is just 24 years old and could maybe blossom with a change of scenery. He also drew reported trade interest from the Cardinals, Diamondbacks, Marlins, and Tigers.

 

 

I disagree with the comp here. Mazara has mostly plateaued as a player, maybe even regressed.  Mancini has arguably not reached his ceiling yet given his stat progression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

I disagree with the comp here. Mazara has mostly plateaued as a player, maybe even regressed.  Mancini has arguably not reached his ceiling yet given his stat progression.

So Mazara has plateaued at the age of 24 and Mancini has not at the age of 27 (soon to be 28)? That might be your belief, but I'm willing to bet that the White Sox are banking on the younger player having the potential for more upside. Mancini might be better offensively (right now), but I think Mazara's youth closes the value gap between the two quite a bit. Maybe the Orioles can get a bit more for Mancini, but if this is any gauge it's definitely not going to be a considerable haul unless a team is desperate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Sure it might take away a landing spot, but I still think Mancini is more closely tied with Castellanos. It just depends if there enough of a market. I like the idea of potentially having the best available bat and relief arm come trade deadline time. 

You don't think Mancini was made available before the trade deadline last season? Because I sure think he was. Agree with the Castellanos comparison, but it's not quite apples to apples because one is a free agent and one would need to be traded for. The Mazara comp isn't perfect, but I think it's probably as close as we're going to get. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

So Mazara has plateaued at the age of 24 and Mancini has not at the age of 27 (soon to be 28)? That might be your belief, but I'm willing to bet that the White Sox are banking on the younger player having the potential for more upside. Mancini might be better offensively (right now), but I think Mazara's youth closes the value gap between the two quite a bit. Maybe the Orioles can get a bit more for Mancini, but if this is any gauge it's definitely not going to be a considerable haul unless a team is desperate. 

I don’t think this is much of a gauge at all.    Mazara’s youth isn’t much of a factor since he’s only under team control for two more years.     It’s highly unlikely that he’ll improve enough in the next two years to be as good as Mancini over that period, plus as you noted Mancini is under control for an additional year.    Mancini's WAR last year was almost double Mazara’s WAR for his entire career.    

I don’t think Mancini would bring a giant haul in a trade, but Mazara is no measure of that IMO.
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Wasn't a huge fan of his swing for that last out today but coming in to pinch hit with 2 outs isn't easy.
    • Interpreting Malike's comment that way is theoretically possible, but I didn't take it that way--didn't feel that shade was being thrown on me at all. But thanks for the concern.
    • People are being a bit ridiculous with the holier than thou takes criticizing a little humor. I am not saying what happened couldn’t cause a significant concussion, but it would be a bit of a fluke if it did. Mullins barely hit him with the bat and he had a helmet on. The fact that it was in the back of the head did make him more vulnerable, but this wasn’t the type of thing you see and think he was lucky to be alive.  Guys have probably hit their heads harder on the top of the dugout or on the fence making catches.  And note this comes from someone whose son has suffered severe concussions and who is well aware of the dangers associated with them. In short, people need to lighten up a bit on guys like Roy.  It was a little gallows humor. 
    • Yeah, you read that wrong. LA2 is one of my favorite posters here and he knows it. No harm, no foul. If you aren't familiar with the game threads, it doesn't matter what the team is doing, people complain about it and people did make that same joke in the game thread long before Roy said it here. Game thread in summary - when the O's are not doing well, it's insufferable, when they are doing well, it's mildly less insufferable. There, that wasn't hard. I'd appreciate it if you didn't assume I'm throwing shade at people. I'll leave that up to you to do, you're really good at it.
    • Comp a. Like Gunnar, and beavers…
    • Wasn't Westburg a 2nd round draft pick?  It's a little early to judge last year's draft.
    • Before Elias.  They generally haven’t missed on a 1st round or 1st round comp pick with the position players.   I trust they’ll make a good decision at #22 and #32.   Their track record in rounds 2-4, particularly on college position players and specifically the last three drafts is suspect.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...