Jump to content

OPACY New Home of the Jays? Update (No. It is Buffalo.)


Pat Kelly

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

This is why I was saying it was gauche of the Pirates to publicly campaign for it, because it wasn't (solely) up to them, the city and state government has a say as well. Now the Pirates look like chumps.

They really just look like they didnt do their due diligence.  I still havent seen where they campaigned for it.

The chumps...that's MLB for not having figured this stuff out weeks ago.  Plan on the fly is working so well.

Look at the NBA....heres the plan, heres how we are going to split revenue, heres how we are going to create a bubble, where the teams will play.  Planned it all out and no positive tests for a week.  Now they are ready to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

They really just look like they didnt do their due diligence.  I still havent seen where they campaigned for it.

The chumps...that's MLB for not having figured this stuff out weeks ago.  Plan on the fly is working so well.

Look at the NBA....heres the plan, heres how we are going to split revenue, heres how we are going to create a bubble, where the teams will play.  Planned it all out and no positive tests for a week.  Now they are ready to play.

Referring to the statement in this Tweet.

Would have been better off to use this time to improve the lights at their AAA stadium in Buffalo, they could have started seeking contractors when it was clear that it was possible that Canada wasn't going to clear them and finalize it when Canada made their decision. Now they are going to end up being 60-game road dogs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

Referring to the statement in this Tweet.

Would have been better off to use this time to improve the lights at their AAA stadium in Buffalo, now they are going to end up being 60-game road dogs.

Naw, they will still be favored over the Marlins and Orioles.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

Would have been better off to use this time to improve the lights at their AAA stadium in Buffalo, they could have started seeking contractors when it was clear that it was possible that Canada wasn't going to clear them and finalize it when Canada made their decision. Now they are going to end up being 60-game road dogs.

I could see some upper-level MLB suit saying "so what else beyond better lighting does the MLB get for this significant investment in a minor league park?" and the answer was "goodwill/nothing" and the idea died right there on the conference room table.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Enjoy Terror said:

I could see some upper-level MLB suit saying "so what else beyond better lighting does the MLB get for this significant investment in a minor league park?" and the answer was "goodwill/nothing" and the idea died right there on the conference room table.

Yeah, I imagine Buffalo's ownership would have to have contributed something. The Buffalo Bisons are owned by Robert Rich who has a net worth of $6+ Billion, higher than most MLB owners. Could have negotiated a series with fans in a future season in Buffalo and turned it into a win/win.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Enjoy Terror said:

I could see some upper-level MLB suit saying "so what else beyond better lighting does the MLB get for this significant investment in a minor league park?" and the answer was "goodwill/nothing" and the idea died right there on the conference room table.

 

MLB to the city of Buffalo: be happy we didn't contract you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Enjoy Terror said:

I could see some upper-level MLB suit saying "so what else beyond better lighting does the MLB get for this significant investment in a minor league park?" and the answer was "goodwill/nothing" and the idea died right there on the conference room table.

 

Improving lights at AAA / Too many Rogers $$$, sad to say. 

If there's a possibility of the BJs being guests at a major league park, I would like to see, on the conflict dates, four-team doubleheaders, with games at 1 or 1.30 and 7.30. 

I haven't read about consideration of what seems like an obvious solution: BJs play home games at Yankee Stadium or Citi Field (avoiding extra home games for the NYYs and Mets whenever possible by using the other field) --  New York City no longer a Covid hot spot, recent and well equipped (if, in one case, despicable) ballparks, flexibility of two fields, central location for AL East and NL East games, a zillion empty hotel rooms (and offices), cardboard fans in place, and no Cito factor. I can see how the NYYs would not want to help a  division rival -- more accurately, I can see Steinbrenner thinking that way. NY State may be miffed at the Buffalo snub or unhappy about more potentially viral non-New Yorkers coming into the State, but a reasonable payment should cure that.

It would be strange, but refreshing, for MLB to do something that makes sense for a change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

A source said other than the Orioles, no other major-league clubs are willing to provide extended assistance to the Jays, who were denied access to play in the Rogers Centre in Toronto by the Canadian government, which is concerned about cross-border travel during the pandemic.

I can't imagine Maryland approving it when Pennsylvania didn't, especially with Baltimore tightening restrictions yesterday. The number of new positive tests in the city announced today was double the amount announced yesterday 

Maybe the fact that the state owns the Hilton where all the players and staff would presumably stay will help. I'm not sure that pointing to economic impact will be enough to overcome health risks.

The fact that Pennsylvania already publicly shot down the Jays also would seem to make it more likely that Maryland will do so. Maryland wouldn't be going out on a limb to deny them. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

I can't imagine Maryland approving it when Pennsylvania didn't, especially with Baltimore tightening restrictions yesterday. The number of new positive tests in the city announced today was double the amount announced yesterday 

Maybe the fact that the state owns the Hilton where all the players and staff would presumably stay will help. I'm not sure that pointing to economic impact will be enough to overcome health risks.

This whole Blue Jays thing is NUTS!!!  The Traveling Blue Jays.  Handle them with care.  Will one of my brethren please post the video?  I don't know how.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

I can't imagine Maryland approving it when Pennsylvania didn't, especially with Baltimore tightening restrictions yesterday. The number of new positive tests in the city announced today was double the amount announced yesterday 

Maybe the fact that the state owns the Hilton where all the players and staff would presumably stay will help. I'm not sure that pointing to economic impact will be enough to overcome health risks.

The fact that Pennsylvania already publicly shot down the Jays also would seem to make it more likely that Maryland will do so. Maryland wouldn't be going out on a limb to deny them. 

There's probably a lot of factors going on in this decision. Mayor Young would obviously be against it - especially after mandating everyone has to wear a mask outside of the house in Baltimore City and closing indoor restaurants again. Governor Hogan might be more into the idea, but like you mentioned, there isn't a lot of reward for the risk. If the Blue Jays have COVID sweep through their makeshift-Camden-Yards based clubhouse, that's going to be a bad look from a PR-standpoint.

But, I'm sure there's also other considerations going on too. The O's and MLB haven't had the most rosy relationship - maybe this is a bit of an olive branch from the Angelos Brothers to MLB, trying to be a team player for the league. Camden Yards' lease is coming up soon, so maybe there is some internal politics stuff going on too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, MurphDogg said:

Yeah, I imagine Buffalo's ownership would have to have contributed something. The Buffalo Bisons are owned by Robert Rich who has a net worth of $6+ Billion, higher than most MLB owners. Could have negotiated a series with fans in a future season in Buffalo and turned it into a win/win.

Great name for a billionaire, tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many non athletes fly in and out of BWI every day?  How many of them are going through the same level of rigorous testing as ML players?  How will 50 additional people traveling into Baltimore increase the risk level in a city of 500,000+ people?

The risk is barely more than zero.  And it creates goodwill with MLB which the Orioles could definitely use.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

How many non athletes fly in and out of BWI every day?  How many of them are going through the same level of rigorous testing as ML players?  How will 50 additional people traveling into Baltimore increase the risk level in a city of 500,000+ people?

The risk is barely more than zero.  And it creates goodwill with MLB which the Orioles could definitely use.

I was with you, until the last sentence. I think MLB needs to give the Orioles some goodwill, but thats just me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I think Norby is going to be a very good MLB offensive player. I’m ok trading him but not for 1/2 season rental types.
    • Yeah I think they need to staggar the lefties in the rotation order. R-R-L-R-L like that.
    • Trading Mayo Kjerstad and Povich for one guy to become a relief pitcher is nuts.
    • We don't need starting pitchers. We need Relief Pitchers. We don't need average Relief Pitchers, we need consistent high leverage/high K Relief Pitchers.
    • If you feel comfortable putting Aiken and Baker (or even Tate) in during an elimination series, that's your prerogative. But I do not. Too inconsistent, which is the same reason why Mike Baumann pitched himself off the active roster. when spot was needed for returning starters off the IL. Currently Coulombe is on IL so we can't even count on one of our best. Cano has regressed from last season. We've also witnessed last season how Webb broke down from over use and was ineffective in the playoff series against Texas. Perez goes in streaks of either really good or concernedly bad (he loses his command). Akin's problem is he leaves the ball over the heart of the plate and he doesn't have good enough stuff to get away with it. They're meatballs. We might get some good times from Baker now that he's up, but I would only expect a month or 2 at best from him before he returns to old habits. And Suarez is a starter who wants to be a starter. Who knows if he will go back to the bullpen? He'll have to go deeper into games if he wants to stay in the rotation, otherwise, I think he should be in the bullpen. But that's not what he is right now in this moment. He's a starter with a ERA in the 1s.
    • It's pretty hard to say definitively that the bolded is true.  It might be, but there's also the loss in ability you have to account for.  30 year olds are slower than 26 year olds too.  Maybe their game knowledge and practice have made it so they can overcome the meager loss in bat speed/athleticism over that time span.  But the picture is a bit muddy.   I also don't think the aging issue is limited to people in their mid-late 30s.  Bat speed peaks at like 24 or 25 based on the data we have right now on it, and after 31 starts falling off fairly fast.  Obviously this is population data and individuals are likely to see different curves.   But outside of the stars that have a lot of ability to lose, it's becoming pretty clear that once you hit your early 30s it's pretty hard to maintain your skills without all the "help" that is extensively tested for.   I think that even for early-30s players teams are much more willing to drop them over giving them expensive market-rate deals, especially since they can abuse young talent so readily.
    • After a really dumb day at work, this was an absolutely delightful read. Seeing a diamond expert and a can of corn detonate a yoked PBA pro was absolutely wonderful. I love this website. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...