Jump to content

Gary Thorne is Back


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
4 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Classic clickbait article. Connelly loves to speculate on random stuff that drums up comments and views. Yet, he doesn’t have much source behind it, does he? Remember his article a few months back talking about Surhoff and all the sour grapes from those being let go? Really relevant now, isn’t it??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure what is going on with Thorne but it is very odd that they announced he is back and there hasn't been a single broadcast with him on it remotely.  You sign someone to a contract and you don't review what the employee's responsibilities are going to be in the contract or with the employee?  Here is your money.  We will call you when or if we need you?  That is strange.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, milbest77 said:

Classic clickbait article. Connelly loves to speculate on random stuff that drums up comments and views. Yet, he doesn’t have much source behind it, does he? Remember his article a few months back talking about Surhoff and all the sour grapes from those being let go? Really relevant now, isn’t it??

I don’t agree with you here at all. There are many clickbait articles from the media but this isn’t one. Connolly did some speculating on the article but when your top TV broadcaster isn’t appearing it’s a story.

Bottom line is they announced he was back before start of season and it looks like he didn’t have a contract. Then after the resumption they leak out some members not coming back due to covid reasons and with Thorne that wasn’t true. Then it is announced he has signed a deal and yet he still hasn’t appeared and has no idea if or when he will. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the thing: he's a play by play guy, not an analyst.  With the season now 16 days away from ending, what role could he have?  They aren't going to bring him in from California this late in the game to do pbp.

Sure, he could do a zoom call or two, like Palmer has done.  But what would that add?  He's not an expert analyst who might add insight with some value like ex players Palmer or Roberts.

At the end of the article Connolly talks about how the Orioles announced in February that Thorne would be back even though there was no signed contract.  We can only guess that happened because the right hand and left hand were not communicating well.  Thorne always negotiated a 1 year deal.  They were probably in the process of doing that but hadn't finalized it yet.  Thorne, a lawyer himself, drives a tough deal.

So someone in PR asked someone in legal, are we going to have Thorne back?  And the person in legal probably said yeah, were close to a contract, working out the details.

So they made the announcement he was back as part of the team, prematurely.  And maybe Gary balked at that, or maybe stuff just dragged out until Covid hit.

Bottom line he wasn't signed and once things were restarting in June it was obvious that a 72 year old was not going to relocate to Baltimore in the middle of all this.  But maybe Gary saw an opportunity to get paid and said look, you announced me as part of the crew when no deal had been signed.  If you don't want me to make a big stink about that and if you have any hopes of wanting me back in 2021...put me on the payroll.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Gary Thorne, he is much better than Garceau. But Kevin Brown has been really impressive too. I wouldn't be too upset if Brown was the main play-by-play guy going forward. I'm sure it saves the Orioles money too, but I think Brown will end up being a national guy within the next 5-10 years.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

I like Gary Thorne, he is much better than Garceau. But Kevin Brown has been really impressive too. I wouldn't be too upset if Brown was the main play-by-play guy going forward. I'm sure it saves the Orioles money too, but I think Brown will end up being a national guy within the next 5-10 years.

I agree.  Multiple friends and myself believe he sounds a tad like Joe Buck, which I enjoy, because it makes me feel like important baseball is being played, which it typically hasn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/11/2020 at 1:22 PM, CarrRun49 said:

You don't like Joe Buck?

 

On 9/11/2020 at 2:13 PM, Moose Milligan said:

No.  I don't know many who do.

He’s OK.    I didn’t like Jack Buck much, but it liked it when somebody hit a high pop up and he’d exclaim “that’s a home run in an elevator shaft!”

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...