Jump to content

Mountcastle’s speed


Frobby

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'll be shocked if Mountcastle plays an inning at short.  Unless Buck comes back and trades for him.

I think Mountcastle was considered a SS coming out of HS about as much as Reynolds was.  I don't recall ever reading anything that predicted he would stay at short.

Yea RM will never play an inning of short unless we somehow revolutionize the defensive shift 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'll be shocked if Mountcastle plays an inning at short.  Unless Buck comes back and trades for him.

I think Mountcastle was considered a SS coming out of HS about as much as Reynolds was.  I don't recall ever reading anything that predicted he would stay at short.

Mountcastle is less a shortstop than Carlos Delgado was a catcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/nolan-reimold-460099?stats=statcast-r-running-mlb

Reimold.

At 32 he was at 28.1 and 33 he was at 27.9.

That's all the data I could find.

Great find, you're right unless Mountcastle (27.8) has yet to attempt max speed running to 1B yet. Which could be possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Even if that's true I think you'd have to assume that 25 year old Reimold would be quicker than 28.1.

While most guys on the top of the speed list are a hair faster in their mid-20s, their top speed doesn't seem to drastically decrease in the early 30s.  Sterling Marte posted the second best average sprint speed of his career at age 31, and he is still able to post >30 fps this year at age 32.

I am increasingly feeling like baseball performance degradation with age has more to do with the grind and the risk of injury, rather than an actual loss of skill.  I suspect that a player like Barry Bonds could still hit Major League pitching at age 56, assuming his vision is still good.  The problem is that he can't do it every day, and he certainly can't do it without risking injury at a much higher rate than a younger person.  I've noticed similar things in in football, watching players like Darryl Green outrunning everyone at age 40.  I think that's why golfers can play into their 40s - aside from being a lower impact sport, you can take weeks off without really hurting your competitive standing, so if you're not feeling great, you take a week off, play a round, hit a few range balls, rehab any nagging injuries, and go back to hitting the ball 400 yards next week.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hallas said:

While most guys on the top of the speed list are a hair faster in their mid-20s, their top speed doesn't seem to drastically decrease in the early 30s.  Sterling Marte posted the second best average sprint speed of his career at age 31, and he is still able to post >30 fps this year at age 32.

I am increasingly feeling like baseball performance degradation with age has more to do with the grind and the risk of injury, rather than an actual loss of skill.  I suspect that a player like Barry Bonds could still hit Major League pitching at age 56, assuming his vision is still good.  The problem is that he can't do it every day, and he certainly can't do it without risking injury at a much higher rate than a younger person.  I've noticed similar things in in football, watching players like Darryl Green outrunning everyone at age 40.  I think that's why golfers can play into their 40s - aside from being a lower impact sport, you can take weeks off without really hurting your competitive standing, so if you're not feeling great, you take a week off, play a round, hit a few range balls, rehab any nagging injuries, and go back to hitting the ball 400 yards next week.

So if someone literally broke their neck, it might slow them down?  ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...