Jump to content

How many games will the O's play in 2021?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

From Sportico:

The World Series has been attended by close to 11,500 fans a game, but those numbers are not enough to offset revenue losses if that’s the maximum number attending games next season. Due to the surging pandemic in the U.S. and Canada, ballparks in New York and California would still be closed to fans in 2021 because of state health and safety rules.

“I think the one thing we’ve learned is that COVID is a really unpredictable virus,” Manfred said. “We don’t know what’s next. But at this point it’s just impossible to speculate what next year’s going to look like. We’ll just have to get closer and then we’ll make the best decisions we can.”

https://www.sportico.com/leagues/baseball/2020/mlb-debt-2020-manfred-1234615474/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

I would guess 162. I doubt we see full stadiums any time soon, but they should be able to play games and draw TV revenue now that testing is already set up and more is known about the disease. 

What TV revenue?

The TV networks pay what they pay for postseason games.   National coverage of regular season games does nothing but fill air time and gets very low ratings.   In a typical season a nationally televised NFL preseason game will get higher ratings than nearly any regular season MLB game.   Fox & TBS pays MLB for the All Star Game and the postseason, they would probably not care if they didn't broadcast any regular season games because no one watches them.   Most baseball fans watch their local team every day.   ESPN is the same except that they do need something to fill programming hours on their networks so they have a little more motivation to broadcast regular season games.   But for the most part, the national TV contracts exist for the postseason.   And MLB knows it so they will try to have as short a season possible because they know Fox & company will still ante up almost as much.   Cut the season in half and Fox will still pay 90% of what they pay now because all they really want is to broadcast the big games in October.

Yes, the local TV revenue exists.   Except in a lot of cases (Balt/Wash, NYY, Bos, many others) it's a team owned network paying the team for the games, so it's just a paper transaction.

A higher chunk of MLB revenue comes from actual attendance than any other major sport.   So it's the one sport where the owners have a strong motivation for a shorter season.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Count me as somewhat pessimistic that they will play a full season next year.   If owners can’t fill the stands without restriction, they will have incentive to make the season as short as they can while still earning TV playoff money.   I don’t think a vaccine will have been widely distributed by April, though hopefully at least a substantial portion of the most vulnerable population will have had one.   And regardless of who is President, the numbers won’t turn around overnight.    They are getting worse right now and my gut instinct is that they’ll continue to get worse over the next few months, particularly with families wanting to be together over the holidays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the owners are not going to commit to playing games until they know fans can attend.  You have to figure that the teams in New York and California have the best attendance and that is where the local governments are going to be the slowest to allow fans to attend.  I also think sports teams and concert venues may allow fans that have shown they have been vaccinated.  We may all need to get a vaccinated tag just like my Golden Retriever.  LOL.  No the government can't mandate we become vaccinated but private business can.  I  wouldn't have a problem with it.  I have spoken to several people who say they will never take a vaccine especially the first one and that is everyone's choice.  If it gets me back the game and concert arena I am fine with it.  

Roch has mentioned in a couple articles that he keeps hearing a delay in the season etc.  He is hearing it from someone in the know I am sure.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Florida is still a COVID nightmare, so I’m not sure how they could have any semblance of a normal spring training.  How many players participate in spring training (ML and MiL combined?). Could teams quarantine all of those players?  Would the players agree to live like that?

Until there’s a trusted vaccine, I can’t imagine anything close to a full season like we had in the Before Times.

I think 2021 may look more like 2020 than 2019.  Best case scenario would be around 90 games, beginning in June, IF we have a reliable vaccine by April.

What are the NBA and NHL planning? Baseball is the only sport I follow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, ChipTait said:

Florida is still a COVID nightmare, so I’m not sure how they could have any semblance of a normal spring training.  How many players participate in spring training (ML and MiL combined?). Could teams quarantine all of those players?  Would the players agree to live like that?

Until there’s a trusted vaccine, I can’t imagine anything close to a full season like we had in the Before Times.

I think 2021 may look more like 2020 than 2019.  Best case scenario would be around 90 games, beginning in June, IF we have a reliable vaccine by April.

What are the NBA and NHL planning? Baseball is the only sport I follow.

In ancient history teams used to train in spring in the Carolinas, Hot Springs Arkansas, Texas, or just in gyms in their home towns.  Yes, that was primitive baseball.  But if Florida and Arizona become the equivalent of Fukushima Exclusion Zones baseball will figure something out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChipTait said:

Florida is still a COVID nightmare, so I’m not sure how they could have any semblance of a normal spring training.  How many players participate in spring training (ML and MiL combined?). Could teams quarantine all of those players?  Would the players agree to live like that?

Until there’s a trusted vaccine, I can’t imagine anything close to a full season like we had in the Before Times.

I think 2021 may look more like 2020 than 2019.  Best case scenario would be around 90 games, beginning in June, IF we have a reliable vaccine by April.

What are the NBA and NHL planning? Baseball is the only sport I follow.

They just had fall instructional league there.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...