Jump to content

Maikel Franco Deal with Os Final


LookinUp

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Yes..

And you are right. Mullins then would be the extra player with Sisco and Valaika. Good catch. I even thought that through and missed that. :D

I do wonder if 4 off days thru April 22 and always a threat of rain this time of the year if that helps them go with 13 instead of 14 arms. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t believe that’s been the case in the past but maybe there was a rule change I glossed over?

In any event, they aren’t going to 60 day him out of the gate unless they know for sure it’s a severe issue.  I guess there is a way of knowing that but I’m not sure with something like this.  It’s always so day to day and week to week.

My recollection from past years is that there is a date in spring training, about a week before Opening Day, that you can retroactively back date DL stints to.

So t he truth is in between.   You can't start the 60 day clock now, but there is a date you can start it that is before Opening Day.   I do not know the exact date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I do wonder if 4 off days thru April 22 and always a threat of rain this time of the year if that helps them go with 13 instead of 14 arms. 

There is a stretch from April 3rd through the 18th with only one scheduled off day assuming no rainouts. That could factor in the team going with a 14 man pitching staff to start the year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

There is a stretch from April 3rd through the 18th with only one scheduled off day assuming no rainouts. That could factor in the team going with a 14 man pitching staff to start the year. 

Yeah, it depends how you frame it.
 

1 game off day -4/2

6 games off day -4/9

9 games off day -4/19

2 games off day - 4/22

I would go with 13 pitchers and react if you need more at some point. Always possible rotation is so bad at start they have to go to that but I wouldn’t commit to it until you have to.  
 

That said maybe there is an arm they want to give a look at for longer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I do wonder if 4 off days thru April 22 and always a threat of rain this time of the year if that helps them go with 13 instead of 14 arms. 

I think with the innings concerns they have this season after last season, I would not be surprised to see a lot of teams going to 14 pitchers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

There is a stretch from April 3rd through the 18th with only one scheduled off day assuming no rainouts. That could factor in the team going with a 14 man pitching staff to start the year. 

Is there a covid allowance for 14 pitchers? I thought it was a 13 pitcher limit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveA said:

My recollection from past years is that there is a date in spring training, about a week before Opening Day, that you can retroactively back date DL stints to.

So t he truth is in between.   You can't start the 60 day clock now, but there is a date you can start it that is before Opening Day.   I do not know the exact date.

I posted about this on page 8, with a link. Basically, the Orioles can put CD on the 60 day IL during Spring Training or during the regular season. However, the player has to stay on the 60 day IL for at least 60 days of the regular season. So, cannot back date it. 
 

Like you, I had the same thought and recollection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jammer7 said:

I posted about this on page 8, with a link. Basically, the Orioles can put CD on the 60 day IL during Spring Training or during the regular season. However, the player has to stay on the 60 day IL for at least 60 days of the regular season. So, cannot back date it. 
 

Like you, I had the same thought and recollection.

Is there a 162 day IL? ;) 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

It's a slight upgrade.  And Maikel Franco was a good prospect for the Phillies a few years ago, maybe Elias thinks there's some better performance he can tease out of him.  

It's not a huge upgrade over Ruiz but it's an upgrade.  

Exactly how I see it, Moosalini.   We’re talking 2.5 rWAR, 4.8 fWAR in 2782 PA vs. 0.4 rWAR, 0.4 fWAR in 812 PA.   Neither is anything to write home about but Franco is a tad better.     So long as we’re not paying him much, I’m cool with it.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Exactly how I see it, Moosalini.   We’re talking 2.5 rWAR, 4.8 fWAR in 2782 PA vs. 0.4 rWAR, 0.4 fWAR in 812 PA.   Neither is anything to write home about but Franco is a tad better.     So long as we’re not paying him much, I’m cool with it.   

There was some conjecture by unknown people replying to some of Heyman's tweets that said it was 1 year/$1.2 million. Take that for what it's worth, of course. But I could see that as a base salary with more incentives. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I don't think anything is dragging right now. Elias said just a few days ago nothing was on the horizon which meant he hadn't heard back most likely from Boros on their offer. After he said that, Franco probably was like, "I need to make a decision" and decided to go with the Orioles offer due to the fact it gives him the chance to play everyday and rebuild his value.

Boros then probably was working some performance bonuses in games played into the mix because he's Boros.

Now we're probably waiting on the medicals to get done before announcing.

In this COVID world, that's not as fast as it's been in the past.

I'm confident Franco will be the starting 3B come opening day, but may be a little rusty with his late start. 

Cots Contracts says Octagon is Franco agent.

https://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/cots/league-info/free-agent-position-players/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • In your retirement you stay up too late and worry too much.  
    • If you want style points, watch figure skating. A bloop hit looks the same as a line drive hit in the box score. A win is a win.
    • Every time we get a pitcher from the A’s this time of year, I think they are still doing us a solid for trading them Pat Neshek for cash in 2012.
    • I understand why you'd be concerned with Webb's performance but that contract is so juicy that I'd jump on him if he were available.  4/82 plus the remainder of his salary this year is a steal for him, even accounting for the fact that pitcher arb awards have been weirdly low.
    • Great to get a 2-0 win facing George Kirby, but man they made it way harder than it had to be. Grayson gets staked to a 1-0 lead in the top of the 4th, then walks 2 of the first 3 batters he faces in the bottom of the inning.  Fortunately, erased on a DP. The O’s score an insurance run in the 7th, but then can’t capitalize on a bases loaded, one out situation with Gunnar and Adley up.   In the bottom half, Grayson allows a single and puts the tying run on via a walk, then makes a poor throw on an easy DP comebacker that could have loaded the bases but Gunnar somehow got a barehand grip on the ball with his foot on the bag.   In the 8th, O’Hearn leads off with a double but the O’s failed to advance him. In the 9th, Kimbrel hits a guy, almost allows a game-tying homer that goes just foul, then hits another guy, and the baserunners both get into scoring position but Kimbrel is able to end it on a strikeout.    I’m thrilled they won, but man they made it gut-wrenching.   
    • 1: A lot of posters here actually have an milb.tv subscription and use it, or they attend games in person.  So you're off base if you think the prevailing opinion here is based on a few social media posts. 2: Henderson doesn't have a famous dad, and Holliday outproduced him at a younger age in the minors, and people here were about equally hyped about Henderson. 3: Holliday put up a 1.000+ OPS in AA as a 19 year old.  AA is harder than power-5 division 1 college baseball.  That's basically like a freshman putting up 25/10/5.  Not 4 points a game.  Get outta here with your terrible Bronny James comparisons.  If people here were actually blinded by a last name then posters here would have thought that Ryan Ripken was a legitimate prospect.  Believe it or not some of us actually do research on things like this.  We certainly aren't alone in rating Holliday highly, as he was rated #1 or #2 overall by every publication I can think of (and #1 by most of them if I recall.) 4: Holliday for Miller, who isn't guaranteed to be healthy enough to be in the starting rotation over the course of his controlled years, is a ludicrous trade proposal and I'm glad you're not our GM.  You're trading Holliday for an ace.  And not just any ace, an ace without injury concerns with years of control left.  Someone like Chris Sale, when the White Sox traded him for Moncada/Kopech+.  Anything less than an ace is a terrible return.  And I get that Moncada was probably a bad #1 overall prospect, but even if you think Holliday is a bad #1 overall too, you're still undervaluing him to an absurd degree by settling for a reliever with injury concerns, even a shutdown one.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...