Jump to content

Robert Neustrom 2021


Hazmat

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, jabba72 said:

.748 OPS in 257 PA's in Norfolk as a 24 year old. Im not really sure those are prospect worthy numbers. Neustrom's not any threat to Santander or Hays at the moment IMO. 

Hays put up a .758 OPS at Norfolk as a 23 year old.   Just saying.    I don't think he's any threat to them at the moment either but he might be a threat to either one of them by next May.   Might.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Hays put up a .758 OPS at Norfolk as a 23 year old.   Just saying.    I don't think he's any threat to them at the moment either but he might be a threat to either one of them by next May.   Might.

Hays glove helps his cause alot, but agree that was not exactly a great season for him.  Still, Neustrom is a year older. You expect more from a corner OF bat in a prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Hays put up a .758 OPS at Norfolk as a 23 year old.   Just saying.    I don't think he's any threat to them at the moment either but he might be a threat to either one of them by next May.   Might.

I always felt Hays had more in him if he could get healthy.  He was so spectacular in 2017, I’ve just always believed in him.    I don’t feel that way about Neustrom, but he might be a mild upgrade over Stewart if we’re lucky.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, jabba72 said:

.748 OPS in 257 PA's in Norfolk as a 24 year old. Im not really sure those are prospect worthy numbers. Neustrom's not any threat to Santander or Hays at the moment IMO. 

24 with the Covid age/level asterisk.

he seems to have some potential as a power hitting platoon guy with some everyday upside. If deployed well, he could be a valuable piece on our team. He may fit better in the NL though given their wider use of pinch hitters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

I have no idea why they would protect Stewart at this point.

As of how things stand right now, there is no good reason not to protect him.

As additions occur and moves are made this offseason, that could change but there are plenty of guys you cut before him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

I have no idea why they would protect Stewart at this point.

Mullins is the only O's outfielder that reasonably can be projected to be both productive and healthy.  Santander and Hays project to miss time on the IL.  And there is no telling how early in the season that could happen.   McKenna does not project to hit in the majors.  Might happen but hard to project.   Stowers and Neustrom should probably be planned to begin the year at AAA.   

Stewart or his replacement is needed early in the season until Stower or Neustrom are deemed ready for promotion by O's management.   Now if Elias can find a cheap, optionable outfielder that is better than Stewart that would be the time to let Stewart go IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, wildcard said:

McKenna does not project to hit in the majors.  Might happen but hard to project.   Stowers and Neustrom should probably be planned to begin the year at AAA.   

Stewart is a bad fielder and his walk rate is his only redeemable quality. McKenna is their best option in the OF after the starters. 

There are other players who should be cut before Stewart, but I’m not going out of my way to keep him.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

Stewart is a bad fielder and his walk rate is his only redeemable quality. McKenna is their best option in the OF after the starters. 

There are other players who should be cut before Stewart, but I’m not going out of my way to keep him.

I think it’s possible Stewart’s hitting could improve some.    Certainly not certain that it will.   But a line like .235/.340/.420 is not out of the question, and that would be somewhat useful even with his defense.   619 PA in the majors is not enough for me to be sure he can’t improve.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

Stewart is a bad fielder and his walk rate is his only redeemable quality. McKenna is their best option in the OF after the starters. 

There are other players who should be cut before Stewart, but I’m not going out of my way to keep him.

I have this fear that Stewart becomes Swisher when he leaves Baltimore. You see the mini stretches of his potential, he just needs to make them last longer. McKenna can’t hit ML pitching. He just doesn’t have the bat speed to catch up to mid 90s FB  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, waroriole said:

I have this fear that Stewart becomes Swisher when he leaves Baltimore. You see the mini stretches of his potential, he just needs to make them last longer. McKenna can’t hit ML pitching. He just doesn’t have the bat speed to catch up to mid 90s FB  

I’m not giving up on him, either.  Hopefully he can spend the winter hitting 97 mph fastballs off the machine and come back better next year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...