Jump to content

Cedric Mullins as a CF


accinfo

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

You can use whatever data you choose.

But when discussing this and knowing that we are only using this season to determine things, I don’t see why it’s a big deal to split it in half when you have 2 extremes.  But hey, have at it the way you want it.

1: you're removing more than half the sample by using May splits.

2: Many stats (wOBA, OBP) have their correlation coefficients triple when you go from a 4 week (~100 PA) sample to a 10 week (260 PA) sample.  Even stats that stabilize relatively quickly (k rate, bb rate) see significant increases in correlation from a 4 week sample to a 10 week sample.  These stats do not increase in correlation linearly, and the line doesn't flatten out until after 100 PA.  So the smaller sample is significantly less enlightening, as you'd expect.

 

Source: https://library.fangraphs.com/principles/sample-size/

 

edit to add: this season to date is almost 40% of his total major league stats, and this season coincides with him batting left handed exclusively.  So using this season only is quite relevant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Hallas said:

1: you're removing more than half the sample by using May splits.

2: Many stats (wOBA, OBP) have their correlation coefficients triple when you go from a 4 week (~100 PA) sample to a 10 week (260 PA) sample.  Even stats that stabilize relatively quickly (k rate, bb rate) see significant increases in correlation from a 4 week sample to a 10 week sample.  These stats do not increase in correlation linearly, and the line doesn't flatten out until after 100 PA.  So the smaller sample is significantly less enlightening, as you'd expect.

 

Source: https://library.fangraphs.com/principles/sample-size/

 

edit to add: this season to date is almost 40% of his total major league stats, and this season coincides with him batting left handed exclusively.  So using this season only is quite relevant. 

1). So? Half of this season he wasn’t that good and certainly not a player you build around.

2) good to hear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

He’s second in the AL in rWAR, a legit MVP candidate based on his play to date.   It’s been a joy to watch, and I’m looking forward to seeing how the rest of his season unfolds.  

Huzzah - watch out, Shohei!

Trezza did a piece for Savant with play-specific details on the one last night, and believe the +7 OAA is up from 6 yesterday, surely mostly on the strength of that one.

https://www.mlb.com/news/cedric-mullins-makes-incredible-catch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mullins sits at 10th in vote getting among AL Outfielders despite being 1st in WAR in that same group (5th overall among AL Position players). 
I know it’s a popularity contest to a large degree, but it would be a bummer for Mullins to not be at least the first guy off the bench.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, survivedc said:

Mullins sits at 10th in vote getting among AL Outfielders despite being 1st in WAR in that same group (5th overall among AL Position players). 
I know it’s a popularity contest to a large degree, but it would be a bummer for Mullins to not be at least the first guy off the bench.

I would think based on Mullins level of play he at least makes it as a reserve, but it won't the first or last time if Mullins gets snubbed from the game. It will mostly be due in part to the Orioles awful record even if the team has a few all star caliber players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I rarely risk disagreeing with FRobby since that will often make me wrong.  But I don’t think you value pre-2021 Mullins equally with 2021 Mullins if you believe that his full time lefty hitter performance represents a repeatable level of ability.  Or at least a level that is likely to remain better than his switch hitter performance.  You don’t totally disregard it but the switch hitting player is clearly different from the left-handed one-so far.  Elias has to decide if something closer to 2021 is likely to be repeated in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

I rarely risk disagreeing with FRobby since that will often make me wrong.  But I don’t think you value pre-2021 Mullins equally with 2021 Mullins if you believe that his full time lefty hitter performance represents a repeatable level of ability.  Or at least a level that is likely to remain better than his switch hitter performance.  You don’t totally disregard it but the switch hitting player is clearly different from the left-handed one-so far.  Elias has to decide if something closer to 2021 is likely to be repeated in the future.

 

His xWOBA based on his statcast batted ball data is not all-star level but it's pretty good. (.337 right now, it was .342 a week or so ago.) and he's expected to outperform his xWOBA because of his speed.  The biggest issue here is that I'm not really sure how you weight his awful 2019 minor league performance.  If you discount that because it was 2 years ago and he was still switch-hitting, he looks a lot better.  But if you count it because 2 years ago is not that long ago, then it really mucks with his projections.  ZIPS has his median projection at .290ish wOBA which is basically a 4th outfielder.  If you take his more recent performance because of him stopping switch hitting, and/or because you weight recent performance higher, then maybe he's closer to a .325-.330 wOBA, which is a good but not great piece.  I would assume that you'd have to see him at a whole season at this level of performance to bump him up to like a .340 or so wOBA projection.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After tonight’s lead-off homer Palmer commented that Mullins is hitting .385 against fastballs over 95mph.  That’s why he’ll continue to have success.  Meanwhile, Sisco just got DFA’d after being unable to hit Major League fastballs.  Hitting the fastball is the most important thing you need to do if you are going to have success.  Your just dead in the water if you can’t catch up with a decent heater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think yesterday was the nail in the coffin for him being on the playoff roster, assuming we make it.
    • I feel that way, too. I keep thinking about 2005.  2005: 10 games over .500 on June 20th. 1st place, two games up.  Shortly after they went on a 2-16 skid, and their last game at .500 was at the the start of that awful home 4 game series in late July when the White Sox swept them, and Raffy was exposed as taking PEDs. They fell under .500 that series and kept on sinking.  2024: 24 games over .500 on June 20th. 2nd place, a half game back.  Then immediately lose five straight. Due to their great start, they can't finish 14 under .500, but the dive feels eerily similar with all of the injuries, dormant bats, and all happening at the same time of year.  The floor coming out from underneath them feels a lot like it. That team was cooked by late July and by the first week of August, Mazzilli got the axe. That won't happen with Hyde this time, as they had a fine start this year, but this can't happen two years in a row under him. 
    • I know …. Gotcha. Trade away Stowers & Norby for Garbage and pick up Rivera & Jiminez. And be surprised when you offense stinks. 
    • You could cut and paste this write up for about every team in the organization. 
    • It’s because the strategies that they are taught and employ work much better in the minors with pitchers with worse stuff and command than in the majors.  This, in turn, inflates their minor league stats.  The good news is that thus far after an adjustment period those players do seem to adjust and do well. 
    • This was the lineup today: The problem is injuries. Hyde didn't have to run out this sort of lineup in May or June. You can nitpick about whether these were the right nine to start, but these are the players on the roster right now and it's because guys who were here in the winning months are not available.
    • I think you agree Roy. The injuries are one thing, but combining them with the continual influx of rookies/ near-rookies - (as promising as they may be) creates instability.  Holliday, Cowser, Mayo, Norby, Kjerstad, Povich, even Stowers.  The past two years: Rutschman and Henderson. One rookie, a solid unremarkable, yet reliable core that had been playing together for several years. Maybe Elias needs to answer for this. I’m not buying the injury excuse for position players. The pitching - amazing job for the injury plague (Kimbrel not included). Have to wonder if these injuries have something to do with the training staff don’t you?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...