Jump to content

Rank Kahlil Watson vs the current O's SS?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, 7Mo said:

That's kinda tough to do given that all that's available on Watson are some brief videos and written blurbs. But from what I've read, the 5'9" Watson profiles more as a second baseman. Video's show excellent bat speed and athleticism and he will likely play short for a few years in MiLB to see how he develops.

From draft comments, it also appears Watson is shooting up boards, either because he's still playing when other high schools aren't, or my speculation is he is more amenable to an underslot deal and therefore, he's rising on boards. Looks like there's a real chance he gets taken at 2. I've read that Elias has seen Watson a lot recently.

As to guys in our system, Gunnar is clearly the best prospect considering both offensive and defensive ceilings and he should have a good chance to stay at short.  

Here's a compilation of draft projections from Trade Rumors:

  • 1. Pirates: Mayer (Callis/Collazo/Law/McDaniel), Henry Davis, Jordan Lawlar, Khalil Watson, Jack Leiter
  • 2. Rangers: Leiter (Callis), Lawlar (Collazo/Law), Davis (McDaniel), Kumar Rocker, Mayer, Watson….in a contrast to the other three pundits, Callis writes that Texas has Lawlar and Davis “on the back burner” behind Watson, Mayer, and Leiter.  “Watson has real heat at this spot,” Collazo writes.
  • 3. Tigers: Mayer, Jackson Jobe (Callis/Collazo), Leiter (Law), Brady House (McDaniel), Lawlar, Watson, possibly Rocker “as a big maybe” in Collazo’s words
  • 4. Red Sox: Lawlar (Callis), Davis (Law), Leiter (Collazo/McDaniel)….Collazo doesn’t believe Leiter would fall beyond Boston at fourth overall,
  • 5. Orioles: Davis (Callis), Colton Cowser (Law), Watson (Collazo/McDaniel), House, Harry Ford, either of Mayer/Lawler if they happened to fall….Baltimore is widely expected to take a college position player at an under-slot price, as a way of keeping money in reserve to go over-slot on other picks.
  • 6. Diamondbacks: Rocker (Callis), Davis (Collazo), Watson (Law), Lawlor (McDaniel), Jobe
  • 7. Royals: Watson (Callis), Rocker (Collazo/Law/McDaniel)….this is another minor consensus area, as Law and McDaniel believe that Rocker isn’t likely to fall beyond Kansas City.  “The market for Rocker is weirdly specific,” Law writes, citing the Rangers, Red Sox, Royals, Nationals, and Mets as perhaps the only true interested parties.  Of course, Callis projected the D’Backs to take Rocker at sixth overall, so Arizona could also be a candidate for the Vanderbilt righty.

Thanks for the great synopsis!

I agree it is very difficult to rank them at this point. A lot of unknowns. I read the comments by Kiley McDaniel, Callis and Mayo. I cannot say that “compact frame” and solid SS excites me when considering a profile of a 5’-09” HS SS, who is “not the elite runner that Abrams is.” I admit that I, like you, have seen limited video and such. If Elias takes him, I’m a fan. But just looking at what is publicly available, I agree he profiles at 2B. A 55 grade arm at SS is ok, but not exceptional. Ideally, I want a little more at SS, but above average is not really a knock. It just isn’t a plus. As players mature and gain muscle and size, the arm can sometimes slide a bit. 

That said, nothing wrong with those things if he hits, and he “competes” at an elite level. We need “winners” in this organization, even if they are nearly average defenders. 

It would be difficult to put such an unknown ahead of some of the existing players. Personally, I think Henderson will have to prove that he can stay at SS, not saying he cannot, just that he has to show that every step. Henderson and Westburg both project to be 3B, or perhaps a corner OF. We’ll see. I personally value defense at SS a great deal over offense. So to rank Grenier and Ortiz at the top right now is based on my value of steady quality defense, and a resurgence at the plate for both. Servideo is supposed to be another excellent defender and the early returns are that his OBP and ability to be patient at the plate are excellent. His versatility seems to indicate a utility profile, but we’ll see what offense he provides. Hall is generally thought to no longer be a SS prospect from what I have read. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

Thanks for the great synopsis!

I agree it is very difficult to rank them at this point. A lot of unknowns. I read the comments by Kiley McDaniel, Callis and Mayo. I cannot say that “compact frame” and solid SS excites me when considering a profile of a 5’-09” HS SS, who is “not the elite runner that Abrams is.” I admit that I, like you, have seen limited video and such. If Elias takes him, I’m a fan. But just looking at what is publicly available, I agree he profiles at 2B. A 55 grade arm at SS is ok, but not exceptional. Ideally, I want a little more at SS, but above average is not really a knock. It just isn’t a plus. As players mature and gain muscle and size, the arm can sometimes slide a bit. 

That said, nothing wrong with those things if he hits, and he “competes” at an elite level. We need “winners” in this organization, even if they are nearly average defenders. 

It would be difficult to put such an unknown ahead of some of the existing players. Personally, I think Henderson will have to prove that he can stay at SS, not saying he cannot, just that he has to show that every step. Henderson and Westburg both project to be 3B, or perhaps a corner OF. We’ll see. I personally value defense at SS a great deal over offense. So to rank Grenier and Ortiz at the top right now is based on my value of steady quality defense, and a resurgence at the plate for both. Servideo is supposed to be another excellent defender and the early returns are that his OBP and ability to be patient at the plate are excellent. His versatility seems to indicate a utility profile, but we’ll see what offense he provides. Hall is generally thought to no longer be a SS prospect from what I have read. 

Agree with everything you said. Very good post.

I was half listening to MLB radio the other day when they were talking about how the shortstop position has changed over the last 20 years. A bigger guy with a cannon for an arm plays much more favorably in todays game than they would have 20 years ago. 

And then, Dan Connolly had a scout tell him this: 

The scout told me that Henderson, a 2019 second-rounder, might be the best player he’s seen so far this year from an upside perspective. And then he dropped this hammer.

“He reminds me of Corey Seager.”

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 7Mo said:

Agree with everything you said. Very good post.

I was half listening to MLB radio the other day when they were talking about how the shortstop position has changed over the last 20 years. A bigger guy with a cannon for an arm plays much more favorably in todays game than they would have 20 years ago. 

And then, Dan Connolly had a scout tell him this: 

The scout told me that Henderson, a 2019 second-rounder, might be the best player he’s seen so far this year from an upside perspective. And then he dropped this hammer.

“He reminds me of Corey Seager.”

I can certainly see that comp. And yeah, the game has changed to bigger SS. The shift and all of the analytics come into play. I still have a hard time giving anyone’s upside anything until they actually do it. Henderson makes a ton of errors right now. Not a big issue, not now. He is still an elite prospect, sure. If I’m a pitcher, I want the guy who makes the most plays, turns outs into outs. But there are also less ground balls these days. I can see it both ways. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

I can certainly see that comp. And yeah, the game has changed to bigger SS. The shift and all of the analytics come into play. I still have a hard time giving anyone’s upside anything until they actually do it. Henderson makes a ton of errors right now. Not a big issue, not now. He is still an elite prospect, sure. If I’m a pitcher, I want the guy who makes the most plays, turns outs into outs. But there are also less ground balls these days. I can see it both ways. 

Yeah, I'm with you there. I haven't watched any of the group enough to feel strongly. Ortiz and Hernaiz seem to have the defensive rep. Hopefully one hits enough. And the guy who winds up being the long time SS may not be in the organization yet. 

Also, the "less ground balls"...you're obviously correct but I think that's going to head the other way soon with spin rates going down. Maybe not drastically but at least some pitchers will have to adapt.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

Yeah, I'm with you there. I haven't watched any of the group enough to feel strongly. Ortiz and Hernaiz seem to have the defensive rep. Hopefully one hits enough. And the guy who winds up being the long time SS may not be in the organization yet. 

Also, the "less ground balls"...you're obviously correct but I think that's going to head the other way soon with spin rates going down. Maybe not drastically but at least some pitchers will have to adapt.

Agreed. I wonder if the sinker/slider combo comes back more so. It has to have somewhat of a correction. I forgot about Hernaiz, he has a ways to go with his bat though. Don’t sleep on Grenier. If he continues to hit the way he has the past 6 weeks. People still love his steady reliable defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jammer7 said:

Agreed. I wonder if the sinker/slider combo comes back more so. It has to have somewhat of a correction. I forgot about Hernaiz, he has a ways to go with his bat though. Don’t sleep on Grenier. If he continues to hit the way he has the past 6 weeks. People still love his steady reliable defense. 

Saw Grenier take a fairly difficult play and make it look real easy today. I want to believe in his bat but I can't quite get there yet. Hope he sustains what he's been doing, or builds on it.

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

Saw Grenier take a fairly difficult play and make it look real easy today. I want to believe in his bat but I can't quite get there yet. Hope he sustains what he's been doing, or builds on it.

That is my hope as well. Sort of a JJ Hardy type, probably not as much power. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

That is my hope as well. Sort of a JJ Hardy type, probably not as much power. 

Have you seen any talk of what's different for him this year?

K's still a little too high, 50 in 156 AB's. 

If he can get close to a JJ type, I'd be thrilled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

Have you seen any talk of what's different for him this year?

K's still a little too high, 50 in 156 AB's. 

If he can get close to a JJ type, I'd be thrilled.

Nothing really specific beyond taking pitches that are not good to hit. Being a little less aggressive on borderline pitches. Buck Britton and their hitting coach have spoken about how the team works on these things. Matt Blood talked about it as well. I do not know about mechanical things. Ortiz obviously is exciting with the strength he added as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, 7Mo said:

And then, Dan Connolly had a scout tell him this: 

The scout told me that Henderson, a 2019 second-rounder, might be the best player he’s seen so far this year from an upside perspective. And then he dropped this hammer.

“He reminds me of Corey Seager.”

Well that's all fine and well, but will he ever get a hit in Aberdeen?  ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/26/2021 at 4:42 PM, 7Mo said:

 

  • 5. Orioles: Davis (Callis), Colton Cowser (Law), Watson (Collazo/McDaniel), House, Harry Ford, either of Mayer/Lawler if they happened to fall….Baltimore is widely expected to take a college position player at an under-slot price, as a way of keeping money in reserve to go over-slot on other picks.
  •  

Why can't we ever have nice things?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

Well that's all fine and well, but will he ever get a hit in Aberdeen?  ?

Probably not. Next hit will be with the O's after they sign him to a 10 year contract and bring him up Thursday so he can learn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

Why can't we ever have nice things?  

Depending on who is available, I wouldn't feel terrible about Cowser.

I would if we passed on Lawlar or Leiter though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I can’t see them moving anyone from the ML team, except maybe Hays or Urias, in a deadline deal. Maybe move Mountcastle in the off-season. 
    • Frobby in particular is a big Hays fan, so I think he’s very biased.  Hays is hitting better and that’s great but just because he’s hitting better, doesn’t mean you play him more. Part of the reason he’s been successful is lesser playing time imo. Same with Mateo early in the season. He was playing occasionally, which was great for him. Now that he’s everyday, he’s exposed and back to not hitting.  I don’t get the Cowser stuff either.  People talk about the importance of defense but then they want to bench our best defensive player. Cowser also brings a lot of speed and good base running as well. But ultimately the funniest part to me is how reliant this board is on statcast stuff and how many on here quote it but yet choose to ignore it w/r/t Cowser. Now, I agree that actual results would be nice and the SSS of RISP/clutch stats is really pathetic on his part but it’s also a SSS and not sure we should be putting that much weight into it. For me, Cowser would start be every righty and somewhere between 25-50% of all lefties. If we can rid ourselves of little bit of this vet depth we have on the team, Kjerstad would be the same. The problem with Kjerstad right now is that the defense isn’t there (at least as well as Cowser) and while I would like his bat in his lineup more, he’s impacted by the DH/1B guys more than Cowser is.  
    • Sending Cowser down or going with a 7 man bullpen?
    • I say send Cowser down for Mayo. This will give Cowser regular AB’s until you forget out what you are going to do at the deadline. I am in no way down on Cowser but think he could use a small reset.
    • Would you be willing to further explain what you mean in stating that Skubal or Crochet are not Verlander/Cole/Greinke/Burnes? Are you saying that because they are not veterans Elias/Sig would not be as interested?  Or are you saying that they are not elite pitchers? If so, can you name all of the starting pitchers in MLB that you think are better in 2024? … I can’t imagine that list is too long.
    • Two more questions for the locals.  Is the casino walking distance to the stadium and good places to hang out and drink before the game?  We are staying at he Renessaince Inner Harbor which looks walkable.   Thanks!
    • You make a lot of legitimate points here.  I’d say these are the reasons I’m not advocating benching Cowser, but I still think his time should be reduced for now until he’s hitting better.  Hays saw his time reduced when he was hitting poorly, and so did Mullins.  Hays hasn’t and won’t be returned to his old status quo, while Mullins is closer to his old status quo.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...