Jump to content

FCL happenings


Frobby

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

 

Man, CoC, you do love you some Grenier!

I'm sure there are many considerations that come into play.  I also do believe them when they say that they have specific things they are looking for.  I would not expect them to tell us what those things are.  Ultimately it's up to you whether you believe them or not.  At the end of the day I do not think they want to fail.

I had to dig to come up with someone that:

  1. Might be considered a prospect
  2. Elias was aggressive promoting

I think they have criteria.  I think that for some players ML service time is one of those criteria.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they take a different approach to players that they believe are legitimate major league possibilities vs. organizational fodder.  So, if they promote someone like Grenier before HO members think the data would justify it, it may be based on a need for a player playing his position on a team with a need at that position.  Grenier certainly is not at the top of the middle infield list for prospects and I don't think they are treating him the same way that they do players like Westburg and Henderson.  I'm not sure why Rodriguez is still in Bowie.  I'd like to see him in Norfolk sooner rather than later.  But, I don't think Elias and Blood are keeping him there for no reason.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

But those are basically the players we are discussing.

The only player that I see Elias gaming the system with is Rutschman.  I don't think anyone else is being held back for service time reasons.  Rodriguez is a 21 year-old in an age appropriate league, even though I think he'd handle AAA fine.  I still think he'll see time there this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

I think they take a different approach to players that they believe are legitimate major league possibilities vs. organizational fodder.  So, if they promote someone like Grenier before HO members think the data would justify it, it may be based on a need for a player playing his position on a team with a need at that position.  Grenier certainly is not at the top of the middle infield list for prospects and I don't think they are treating him the same way that they do players like Westburg and Henderson.  I'm not sure why Rodriguez is still in Bowie.  I'd like to see him in Norfolk sooner rather than later.  But, I don't think Elias and Blood are keeping him there for no reason.

Oh there's a reason.  I don't think it's related to his performance/experience though. 

Has Elias done any multi-promotions yet this season?  He may have a hard and fast rule against it. I can think of a few guys who are deserving of second promotions starting with GRod, Westburg, Mundy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

The only player that I see Elias gaming the system with is Rutschman.  I don't think anyone else is being held back for service time reasons.  Rodriguez is a 21 year-old in an age appropriate league, even though I think he'd handle AAA fine.  I still think he'll see time there this season.

So, you think if they change the rules and guys become FAs sooner, that Elias will operate the exact same way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

The only player that I see Elias gaming the system with is Rutschman.  I don't think anyone else is being held back for service time reasons.  Rodriguez is a 21 year-old in an age appropriate league, even though I think he'd handle AAA fine.  I still think he'll see time there this season.

If you are going to game the system with Rutschman why wouldn't you do it with Rodriguez?  Both top of the food chain prospects.  They will gain the extra year of service time if the rules allow it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I had to dig to come up with someone that:

  1. Might be considered a prospect
  2. Elias was aggressive promoting

I think they have criteria.  I think that for some players ML service time is one of those criteria.

But isn't this true with every single org possibly excepting the very richest or those who gain a now advantage in a playoff race? 

Even Witt Jr.'s aggressive promotions won't result in him up prior to the cutoff next season, I'd wager.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • While I agree and find your comment funny, maybe just say something along the line of”Don’t give up on this team” or “Quite being Debbie downers” instead of assuming they are projecting the own misery in their lives. People might take it better if it doesn’t feel like a personal attack. Either way, that win felt good and I HOPE this is finally the turning point going into the playoffs soon. 
    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
    • Looks like Baseball Fandom was at the game today!
    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...