Jump to content

A's get Holliday


mhd24

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Wow... I'm sure that link is going to get updated, but as of this moment: the entire link is the following:

"The Oakland Athletics have acquired star outfielder Matt Holliday in a trade with the Colorado Rockies, SI.com has learned."

Guess I'll wait or dig for the details later. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know...

We sit around on this board all day and squabble about who we should get and who we shouldn't get and the reasons behind those thoughts. It was only a few days ago when the subject of Holliday was brought up and quickly shot down.

...and then the A's do this. And you sit there and think to yourself "Damn. Maybe it wouldn't have been a bad move..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know...

We sit around on this board all day and squabble about who we should get and who we shouldn't get and the reasons behind those thoughts. It was only a few days ago when the subject of Holliday was brought up and quickly shot down.

...and then the A's do this. And you sit there and think to yourself "Damn. Maybe it wouldn't have been a bad move..."

AND... Billy Beane Jr., (aka Sports Guy :) ) was among the round of guys to say no to that trade. A lot depends on how much the A's gave up to get him, but I would have loved to have him in LF in Baltimore this year. Especially if we had a realistic chance of resigning him beyond 2009.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AND... Billy Beane Jr., (aka Sports Guy :) ) was among the round of guys to say no to that trade. A lot depends on how much the A's gave up to get him, but I would have loved to have him in LF in Baltimore this year. Especially if we had a realistic chance of resigning him beyond 2009.

Unless Holliday fires Boras as his agent, you've got to think he's going to test Free Agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:eektf: :eektf: :eektf: :eek:

I DID NOT SEE THAT ONE COMING! Terrible move by the A's. Mcafee is nor for hitters.

I think this move is worse for the Rockies. He carried them in 2007, and I don't see any way for them to make up for his offense. Who is our ROX correspondant??? Break this down for us! I like the Rockies, but I'm afraid they made a bad move... let them use the picks themselves!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this move is worse for the Rockies. He carried them in 2007, and I don't see any way for them to make up for his offense. Who is our ROX correspondant??? Break this down for us! I like the Rockies, but I'm afraid they made a bad move... let them use the picks themselves!

Holliday is likely to be high on the Type A list next season, so the A's will probably get somebody's 1st round pick for him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This per SI/RotoWorld/MLBTraderumors....Can Am take a clue and trade:

Hernandez/Cabrera/Baez/Walker and or it does not take months to make a deal.

It does when you're trying to trade parts no one wants. How are those (barely warm) bodies relevant to a discussion of Holliday for established goods and prospects?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:eektf: :eektf: :eektf: :eek:

I DID NOT SEE THAT ONE COMING! Terrible move by the A's. Mcafee is nor for hitters.

You want good hitters in a bad hitters ball park, because they are more valuable (think scarcity).

The edge a good hitter has is decreased in a high offensive park.

--

Fun to see how Holliday does. His road stats the last two years are not too shabby at like .300/.390/480 and we know the average player post a .030 higher OPS at home, for obvious reasons.

But even more so the Coors edge is not so much that balls carry better post-humidor but that pitches move less, especially breaking balls, at Coors.

Matt can clearly hit and a theory is he'll do better than expected out of Coors because his current road stats also reflect the difficult in adjusting to more movement on balls (expecially breaking balls) every time the Rox go on a road trip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...