Jump to content

Orioles promote 1 Coach, hire second


Legend_Of_Joey

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, CarrRun49 said:

Ok. But he is Adley Rutschman. Not Buster Posey.  One is going to the Hall of Fame. The other hasn't seen a major league pitch.

I don't think Buster Posey knows anything anything about Ryan Fuller and that is who we are talking about.  Adley has worked with Fuller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I'm still think highly of Holt.  I think missing a month hurt. 

I don't know how  Fuller will work out but he will surely will be bringing the philosophy he has been successfully preaching in the minors.

All of this is fine..just don’t go over the top about it.  Just see how it plays out, that’s all I’m saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CarrRun49 said:

Huh? I love Adley.  But this is a weird take.  It falls in line with Adley being the second coming of Jesus in cleats.  "If Adley says so, he must be right".  I heard Adley really liked working with Tom Eller at Aberdeen.  Therefore, he is the right guy for the job.

I am sure the coach's rapport and success with the teams top prospect had to be a consideration. Certainly better than the opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I am sure the coach's rapport and success with the teams top prospect had to be a consideration. Certainly better than the opposite.

Sure. But saying everyone will just fall in line because Adley says so is a different story.  People react to differently to various styles and philosophy. Player A may be a match made in heaven for Mr. Fuller's teachings. Player B may not.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I'm still think highly of Holt.  I think missing a month hurt. 

I don't know how  Fuller will work out but he will surely will be bringing the philosophy he has been successfully preaching in the minors.

I think Holt deserves another year to show what he can do, but to me the burden of proof is on him at this point.   Last year’s pitching was abysmal and it’s not like it got better as the year went along.  

As to Fuller, I don’t think he was preaching anything different from what Don Long was preaching.   But he had a club full of players who had been drafted by Elias, who weighs good plate discipline heavily when he’s deciding who to draft.   I see guys like Mountcastle and Hays who are striving mightily to develop more plate discipline, but it’s just not in their nature to be very disciplined hitters.  I doubt Fuller can change that in any very dramatic way, though we can hope for continued incremental improvement.   
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think Holt deserves another year to show what he can do, but to me the burden of proof is on him at this point.   Last year’s pitching was abysmal and it’s not like it got better as the year went along.  

As to Fuller, I don’t think he was preaching anything different from what Don Long was preaching.   But he had a club full of players who had been drafted by Elias, who weighs good plate discipline heavily when he’s deciding who to draft.   I see guys like Mountcastle and Hays who are striving mightily to develop more plate discipline, but it’s just not in their nature to be very disciplined hitters.  I doubt Fuller can change that in any very dramatic way, though we can hope for continued incremental improvement.   
 

Its always been on Holt to prove himself at the major league level.  

I agree that there were not many that improved as the season went on but there were a couple.  Lopez hadn't had much success with other clubs but he turned into a good 4 inning pitcher that belongs in relief.   Sulser has a good season overall and his first complete season in the majors.  He had some trouble in the 2nd half but finished strong in Sept.   Ellis did well late in the season but I don't think Holt had a lot to do with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Its always been on Holt to prove himself at the major league level.  

I agree that there were not many that improved as the season went on but there were a couple.  Lopez hadn't had much success with other clubs but he turned into a good 4 inning pitcher that belongs in relief.   Sulser has a good season overall and his first complete season in the majors.  He had some trouble in the 2nd half but finished strong in Sept.   Ellis did well late in the season but I don't think Holt had a lot to do with that.

Any pitching coach is going to have some success with players here and there.  That is why they have the job.  That should happen.  Patting him on the back for making a bad pitcher sort of mediocre isn’t something incredibly accomplishment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Its always been on Holt to prove himself at the major league level.  

I agree that there were not many that improved as the season went on but there were a couple.  Lopez hadn't had much success with other clubs but he turned into a good 4 inning pitcher that belongs in relief.   Sulser has a good season overall and his first complete season in the majors.  He had some trouble in the 2nd half but finished strong in Sept.   Ellis did well late in the season but I don't think Holt had a lot to do with that.

Lopez was bad in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd innings. Ok in the 4th, terrible epically bad in the 5th. I think "good 4 inning pitcher" is a pretty big overstatement there and if that is anywhere near the top of his success portfolio that is pretty bad. I'm fine with trying Holt for a while rather than scapegoating the pitching coach but let's not pretend Lopez was ever a good starting pitcher in any capacity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two young inexperienced energetic analytical-approach coaches. It isn’t what they know, it is their ability to communicate what they DO know to the player. Like any coach, it will take time to build a rapport with each player and earn their trust and respect. It is valid to wonder how they will do with guys like Mancini, Santander, Hays, Mullins, Mountcastle, etc… We do not know what impact Fuller may have had with guys in spring training or at the alternate site in 2020. He may already be a bit of a known quantity to some of the guys. But, maybe more importantly, the wave of guys coming from the minor leagues will feel comfortable with him and that should help with their transitions. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I get that everybody wants the best of both worlds. But 2 questions: 1) What would be the plan for the pitching next year if we just went the rental/shortest term route? 2) Is Quantrill a guy that you trust making postseason starts? If so, what gives you confidence in him?
    • Because it's an attempt to curb one team's fanbase from stuffing the ballot.
    • 1 vs 2 vote is stupid after #1 already got the most votes.  Why not 2 cs 3 for reserve?
    • Picking at 22 and 32 we have a chance to nab some guys with resumes. Benge, Brecht, Honeycutt, Amick, White, Culpepper, and one of the NCAA C if we want. Hopefully we can get two of those guys when we pick. Developing pitching and keeping it healthy is hard. With our recent history with bats it might be good to keep growing them. Benge and White/Amick would be ideal. They could be real close to Bowie this time next year. 
    • Hopefully, Santander is Tuck’s replacement. He is worthy, and his hard work should be rewarded if there is room.  Kimbrel would have been nice, but Clay Holmes, when rested and healthy, has much better stuff. I know the numbers are poor for him at the moment, but he is nasty. Kimbrel is a gutty vet who used to be incredibly tough. His selection this year would have been about his career and legacy. That is not a popular take on this board, so be it. Westburg and Mountcastle can use the time off. Both are supposed to be fairly banged up at the moment. O’Hearn is just another guy I would have loved to see make it. A grinder, who exemplifies the blue collar fan base of Baltimore. A great story, but mostly a platoon guy.
    • Outside of any of the "snubs" losing out of any potential bonuses, I don't care. I'd almost rather see them getting a solid break mid season anyways. 
    • I think there is a better term than "angry" to describe some of the O's. Anger seldom results in anything positive. Now, playing with attitude is another thing. GH is certainly the "King" of attitude on this team, no one is going to beat him. I believe there are several position players that show attitude in different ways. Pitchers?? SP throw 90 or so pitches. They can't afford to display emotions or they would be worn out much earlier. They also can't afford to have the "deer in the headlights" look. Of the O's starters, I believe CP is in that world at present. It's mainly an experience and growth thing.  GR, IMO, has approved significantly in that department over the last year. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...