Jump to content

Some Intriguing prospects up for Rule 5 grabs (in my opinion):


DocJJ

Recommended Posts

Ben: Any guesses as to why the Rays didn’t protect Blake Hunt? He is on the BOARD as a 50 FV with a 2022 eta. Do the Rays think is farther away and no one will rule 5 draft him? Or are they planning to trade him before the draft? Or do you think they are just a lot lower on him than you and Eric?
2:27
Kevin Goldstein: The Rays had a serious crunch and decisions had to be made. It’s really hard to take a catcher with 17 games above A-Ball and expect him to stick in the big leagues, He also had a disappointing year. I think they made the right choice there.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/19/2021 at 8:54 PM, DocJJ said:

Of this bunch, I'd take Robinson Pena (best combination of ceiling, potential, close to majors) or Austin Cox who doesn't have the same ceiling, but is capable and has the bonus of being left handed.

Plus he's from the Angels -  We love Angels pitchers!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Frobby said:

Here’s a possibility for a trade.   The Braves just signed Manny Pina two a two year deal and they already have Travis D’Arnaud under contract for two years as well.   So, it appears their 23-year old backup William (I’m not Wilson) Contreras is expendable.   He played 52 games last year, basically at replacement level but he was a rookie and maybe has room to grow, and probably wouldn’t cost much.   https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/c/contrwi02.shtml

Oh wow.  I missed this post - I had the exact same idea.  Great minds...  well.  Anyway, Langaliers (the 2nd catcher picked in the Adley draft) is likely the Braves catcher of the future - ahead of Contreras.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Frobby said:
Ben: Any guesses as to why the Rays didn’t protect Blake Hunt? He is on the BOARD as a 50 FV with a 2022 eta. Do the Rays think is farther away and no one will rule 5 draft him? Or are they planning to trade him before the draft? Or do you think they are just a lot lower on him than you and Eric?
2:27
Kevin Goldstein: The Rays had a serious crunch and decisions had to be made. It’s really hard to take a catcher with 17 games above A-Ball and expect him to stick in the big leagues, He also had a disappointing year. I think they made the right choice there.

The few articles I saw on the Rays Rule 5 decisions had him as a lock to be protected. However, he really didn't hit last year and also didn't do great with base runners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

The few articles I saw on the Rays Rule 5 decisions had him as a lock to be protected. However, he really didn't hit last year and also didn't do great with base runners.

He had a .735 at A+ last year. Very minimal AA ABs but he was pretty bad there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you can plan to use a Rule V pick for a role you are going to need to use all the time.  Backup catcher, whether Adley or anyone else, is going to play a couple times a week.  Rule V picks are good if you can stash them a the end of the bench as a pinch runner, defensive replacemnent or mop up duty in the bullpen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, connja said:

I don't think you can plan to use a Rule V pick for a role you are going to need to use all the time.  Backup catcher, whether Adley or anyone else, is going to play a couple times a week.  Rule V picks are good if you can stash them a the end of the bench as a pinch runner, defensive replacemnent or mop up duty in the bullpen.

If a catcher was that good they wouldn’t be available in the Rule 5 draft. It’s a nice idea, but the O’s need to target a veteran experienced catcher to pair up with Adley.

Also if the service time rules are unchanged, it likely means that we don’t see AR until a few weeks into the season. Another reason to bring in a veteran backstop. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

If a catcher was that good they wouldn’t be available in the Rule 5 draft. It’s a nice idea, but the O’s need to target a veteran experienced catcher to pair up with Adley.

Also if the service time rules are unchanged, it likely means that we don’t see AR until a few weeks into the season. Another reason to bring in a veteran backstop. 

But why?  Results don't matter.  Maximize talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Why do they NEED this?  
 

Do you feel if they don’t do this that Adley won’t reach his full potential?

I don’t see why we can’t have both. We could have Suzuki around on an MiLB deal until 6/1. Then DFA him when AR comes up. He’d play 4-5 times a week. It might help our pitching too. Then let a rule 5 catcher play the other 1-2 games. IIRC, there are lots of off days in the first part of the season. I don’t see the new CBA changing that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I really like Tahnaj Thomas of the Pirates for the bullpen. He's only 22 and was their 13th ranked prospect. He didn't have the best year last season and for some reason wasn't protected. They say he can hit over 100 at times and averages 96 MPH. He is also a former second round pick. I feel like he would be a perfect Rule 5 pick to add to the bullpen and see what the coaches can do with him. I feel he could be a steal for us. 

https://www.bucsdugout.com/2021/11/22/22795064/will-pittsburgh-pirates-regret-their-tahnaj-thomas-decision

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 11/22/2021 at 8:16 PM, sportsfan8703 said:

Would love to take a catcher in the Rule 5. There seems to be a bunch available. No reason why we can’t get a cheap 6 year caddy to AR. 

AR can be his mentor.  Under ordinary circumstances, that would be a recipe for disaster, but I think w/ AR's advanced development it could work.  Would the O's need to have a 3rd reliable catcher?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Frustrating sure, but boring is not what I would I say. We do steal bases at times. I would like for us to play more small ball sometimes and it is frustrating to see us be so homerun happy. I think with Westy back, we will see a resurgence of timely hitting as that is very contagious.   We saw that at the beginning of the year. Amazing sight to see for sure. I think the most disheartening thing that really shocked me is the apathy and outright disgust I’ve seen from O’s fans toward their team. Perhaps we have been spoiled? No idea. Maybe expectations were too high? No idea, but frankly, a lot of yall focusing on other things and simply not watching/posting would make next season a lot more enjoyable. This is the first time since 96-97 where we make the playoffs in back to back years and you guys have been acting like some real lame jerks this whole dang season. Frankly, yall should be ashamed of yourselves. We are an incredibly young team and with that come highs and lows, but yall don’t see that. You just love to complain and moan and bloviate. Where’s the heart? Where’s the loyalty? Where’s the gratitude? You’d think with all this team has overcome, especially being so young, y’all would be happy, but no. So go off on your little bike rides or whatever. Go watch a movie if this saga seems boring to you. I don’t care. Just for once this season, keep your immense negativity to yourself.
    • Really an amazing run, 4 straight years. I completely agree with the ranking, too. There's no way Kjerstad is still a prospect though, right? 45 days is the cutoff and he's played in 48 games.
    • i think we all are going to have ptsd from that 9th inning for a while,it was that brutally bad . they need to do some special to get us to forget about it
    • wow,did gunnar and adley have to do this last season? 
    • I suggested that earlier but I think it's probably a bad play with no out. The O's have like 85% probability of scoring. There is a huge downside risk of Mullins popping up the bunt for a double play. He could also whiff on the bunt making at least Holliday an easy out. With one out and only 65% probability of scoring it's a much better play. I think if Santander and Mullins were reversed in the lineup Hyde may have done it but not when you have two shots to get the run in. 
    • WE GOT US ONE - JD5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Completely disagree about Orr. He will be fine. His defense has been better in its first few games compared to McDonald’s first few games.     And some of these big passing stats are over exaggerated. There have been mistakes for sure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...