Jump to content

I'm already over this offseason.


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Pickles said:

You keep advocating for things without actually evaluating whether they're good or not.

Of course the O's could have signed anyone.  If they offered them enough money.  That doesn't even begin to evaluate whether they should or not.

You want to go on the record now and say that is a good signing by Texas?

I don't think anyone is screaming and yelling that the Orioles should have given Semien seven years.  But I do think it shows that a rebuilding team should not be afraid to add elite talent (arguable if that is Semien) even if they are "rebuilding" when the opportunity presents itself.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pickles said:

You keep advocating for things without actually evaluating whether they're good or not.

Of course the O's could have signed anyone.  If they offered them enough money.  That doesn't even begin to evaluate whether they should or not.

You want to go on the record now and say that is a good signing by Texas?

Really, did I advocate us signing Semien?  I believe I said in the very next post it was a bad signing.

I think I've been pretty clear that Ed-Rod and Matz could have been good signings for us.  Would you have wanted one of them or both of them or rolled into 2022 with Kremer, Akin, and Lowther?  You get one of Ed-Rod or Matz and you're looking at a rotation of Means, G-Rod, Ed-Rod/Matz and then whatever 4th and 5th you want to fill in with Kremer/Akin/Lowther.  That's a good top 3.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hazmat said:

Maybe Elias is just waiting for the market to settle for Kris Bryant. ?

Depends on the numbers, I'm not sure if Bryant would be good for us or not.  Some seem to think he can still play at a relatively high level, others aren't so sure.  It would be a risk for us but it would certainly depend on the length of the contract.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

"Yeah, but the Rangers play in a weaker division so this makes more sense for them."

 

Rangers are about to cripple their payroll with two dubious signings. Semien is signing a 7 year deal and he turns 32 years old next year. And Story has a career home OPS of .972 versus .752 on the road. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Rangers are about to cripple their payroll with two dubious signings. Semien is signing a 7 year deal and he turns 32 years old next year. And Story has a career home OPS of .972 versus .752 on the road. 

No, I know.  They're dumb signings.  You'd have thought they'd have learned back when they signed A-Rod to his first deal but clearly they didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Really, did I advocate us signing Semien?  I believe I said in the very next post it was a bad signing.

I think I've been pretty clear that Ed-Rod and Matz could have been good signings for us.  Would you have wanted one of them or both of them or rolled into 2022 with Kremer, Akin, and Lowther?  You get one of Ed-Rod or Matz and you're looking at a rotation of Means, G-Rod, Ed-Rod/Matz and then whatever 4th and 5th you want to fill in with Kremer/Akin/Lowther.  That's a good top 3.  

So you want to complain that the O's didn't do something you don't think they should have done?

That's...... rational.

You bring up E-Rod.   I brought him up this summer and I identified him as a good target.  If you want to complain about the O's not signing E-Rod- more power to you- but you do it when the O's don't sign E-Rod.

You don't do it every time some other random team signs a FA, particularly when you believe that specfic FA contract is a bad idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pickles said:

So you want to complain that the O's didn't do something you don't think they should have done?

That's...... rational.

You bring up E-Rod.   I brought him up this summer and I identified him as a good target.  If you want to complain about the O's not signing E-Rod- more power to you- but you do it when the O's don't sign E-Rod.

You don't do it every time some other random team signs a FA, particularly when you believe that specfic FA contract is a bad idea.

Seems to me that he's questioning the process moreso than the individual players.

I think that you don't cut yourself off from any source of talent.  That goes for the International market or the free agent market.  You need to pull from all of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Yardball85 said:

I don't think anyone is screaming and yelling that the Orioles should have given Semien seven years.  But I do think it shows that a rebuilding team should not be afraid to add elite talent (arguable if that is Semien) even if they are "rebuilding" when the opportunity presents itself.

But if Semien isn't an example of that, then why try to use him as an example of that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...