Jump to content

Means DL, Smith outrighted, welcome back Lakins


Legend_Of_Joey

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, bobmc said:

Yes - for sure.  What I thought ironic was Hyde's statement just prior to Means' start.  He was asked if he would have pulled Means if he had gone 7 hitless, perfect innings on 80 pitches (like Kershaw).  He answered, Absofriggin luteley NOT.  Then Means has a booboo to his forearm and he pulls him.  I am not saying that he shouldn't have pulled him.  I'm just laughing at the false bravado.

Pretty sure there is a difference between a “boo-boo on his forearm” (that could be turning into something bad) vs. just being overly cautious 5 games into the season.

Or maybe he learned his lesson after the David Hess incident in Toronto…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveA said:

Who has said Means will be back in 10 days?   I haven't seen any type of statement about the actual severity of the injury.

Starters, relievers, they are all interchangable.   Lakins is on the team now, if he only relieves, then we'll either bring someone else up to start Tuesday or else we'll go with someone currently in the pen (AWells, Baumann, Akin, or a piggyback of 2 guys).

Lakins was probably the freshest arm available.

I'm getting a little jumpy, but the next time the Orioles can't skip over Means turn in the rotation, I want the start to go to Bradish. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

Lol Lakins are you kidding me?

Elias, if you're reading this...dude, get it together.  Time's up, no more excuses. 

Elias doesn't need any more excuses. He's already given himself a pass on the Orioles' entire season.

It's as if he doesn't want to weaken the Tides or jeopardize the Orioles' MiL ranking. The Orioles have MLB's worst record and the Tides are a game and a half out of first, so everything's right on plan.  

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, bobmc said:

Yes - for sure.  What I thought ironic was Hyde's statement just prior to Means' start.  He was asked if he would have pulled Means if he had gone 7 hitless, perfect innings on 80 pitches (like Kershaw).  He answered, Absofriggin luteley NOT.  Then Means has a booboo to his forearm and he pulls him.  I am not saying that he shouldn't have pulled him.  I'm just laughing at the false bravado.

I think the Dodgers should have given Kershaw the choice if he wanted to try and finish a perfect game.  He's already had a Hall of Fame career.  99% sure Hyde would have pulled Means at 100 pitches if not 80, if it happened this time of year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveA said:

He was implying that, and they are.   He said that we all expected him to go on the IL, given the Orioles cautiousness.

I see nothing controversial about his statement.   I certainly expected him to go on the IL.

The implication was that another team might not DL him. I also don't know that the Orioles are more conservative than norm. That should be backed up. What Os have gone on the DL that didn't need to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

The implication was that another team might not DL him. I also don't know that the Orioles are more conservative than norm. That should be backed up. What Os have gone on the DL that didn't need to?

That's on you, 100% on you.  I'm not sure how you read what I wrote and came away with that.

And It's IL not DL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

The implication was that another team might not DL him. I also don't know that the Orioles are more conservative than norm. That should be backed up. What Os have gone on the DL that didn't need to?

The way they are babying their prospects, having them throw fewer pitches/innings than comparable guys on other teams, keeping Hall and Bradish behind for a week in Sarasota rather than having them go to their minor league teams, etc.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Glad Bob Melvin and I don’t see eye to eye on that issue Well said, that make two of us, Bunting Ced down 5-3 with nobody out that late in the game is absurd.
    • Sorry to hear this--wishing you a sound recovery, in time for the O's run to the Series! (That would speed up the healing!)
    • Santander is a good case for the Rule V draft. That's unfortunately the same system that's going to make his next contract potentially look bad. If only he were a couple of years younger. It's hard to commit 25+M to a player at 30+. He's going to be missed in Baltimore, on the field and by the fans, but he's someone that they're going to have to let move on. 
    • While I agree and find your comment funny, maybe just say something along the line of”Don’t give up on this team” or “Quite being Debbie downers” instead of assuming they are projecting the own misery in their lives. People might take it better if it doesn’t feel like a personal attack. Either way, that win felt good and I HOPE this is finally the turning point going into the playoffs soon. 
    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...