Jump to content

The RISP thread, 2022


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 4 weeks later...

I guess it’s too late unwieldy to list the RISP numbers daily, so I’ll try weekly instead.  The first “week” will be the ten days period that ended on April 17.   All references are to the week ending _____.


4/17: 10 for 86 (.116); 21 runs in 9 games

4/24: 11 for 58 (.190); 23 runs in 7 games

5/1: 15 for 52 (.288); 27 runs in 6 games

5/8: 10 for 43 (.233); 25 runs in 6 games

So far this week, 8 for 35.   Last night was an ugly 1 for 12, leaving the bases loaded in each of the final three innings.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I guess it’s too late unwieldy to list the RISP numbers daily, so I’ll try weekly instead.  The first “week” will be the ten days period that ended on April 17.   All references are to the week ending _____.


4/17: 10 for 86 (.116); 21 runs in 9 games

4/24: 11 for 58 (.190); 23 runs in 7 games

5/1: 15 for 52 (.288); 27 runs in 6 games

5/8: 10 for 43 (.233); 25 runs in 6 games

So far this week, 8 for 35.   Last night was an ugly 1 for 12, leaving the bases loaded in each of the final three innings.  

So they seem to be getting better with RISP but the chances seem to be going down each week. The Tigers were hitting and walking guys the last two innings and besides the homers ,no other hits.

 

Do we know league average with RISP for the year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I guess it’s too late unwieldy to list the RISP numbers daily, so I’ll try weekly instead.  The first “week” will be the ten days period that ended on April 17.   All references are to the week ending _____.


4/17: 10 for 86 (.116); 21 runs in 9 games

4/24: 11 for 58 (.190); 23 runs in 7 games

5/1: 15 for 52 (.288); 27 runs in 6 games

5/8: 10 for 43 (.233); 25 runs in 6 games

So far this week, 8 for 35.   Last night was an ugly 1 for 12, leaving the bases loaded in each of the final three innings.  

Those are some ugly numbers.  I guess the good news is we really can’t do much worse.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

So they seem to be getting better with RISP but the chances seem to be going down each week. The Tigers were hitting and walking guys the last two innings and besides the homers ,no other hits.

 

Do we know league average with RISP for the year?

.236 in the AL.  The O’a are 14th, at .197.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

So they seem to be getting better with RISP but the chances seem to be going down each week.

A higher average with RISP probably leads to less PAs with RISP. Because if you get a hit, there is often nobody left in scoring position for the next guy. But if everyone is just getting out you can rack up multiple PAs with RISP in a row. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

  .   .   .

Last night was an ugly 1 for 12, leaving the bases loaded in each of the final three innings.  

But even with that strong finish in the 7th through 9th, they left only 14 for the game. The ML record for a nine-inning game is 18, certainly within this team's reach. 

https://www.baseball-almanac.com/recbooks/left_on_base_records.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Glad Bob Melvin and I don’t see eye to eye on that issue Well said, that make two of us, Bunting Ced down 5-3 with nobody out that late in the game is absurd.
    • Sorry to hear this--wishing you a sound recovery, in time for the O's run to the Series! (That would speed up the healing!)
    • Santander is a good case for the Rule V draft. That's unfortunately the same system that's going to make his next contract potentially look bad. If only he were a couple of years younger. It's hard to commit 25+M to a player at 30+. He's going to be missed in Baltimore, on the field and by the fans, but he's someone that they're going to have to let move on. 
    • While I agree and find your comment funny, maybe just say something along the line of”Don’t give up on this team” or “Quite being Debbie downers” instead of assuming they are projecting the own misery in their lives. People might take it better if it doesn’t feel like a personal attack. Either way, that win felt good and I HOPE this is finally the turning point going into the playoffs soon. 
    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...