Jump to content

Mancini ejection?


SteveA

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It's the Umps job to run the game, if a player is stopping that from happening they should have the power to remove them.

Of course they should not abuse that power.

The way some players act toward umps would never be allowed in the general workforce.

This is theater, period  .. performaces performed for us as fans. That is the product.  They don’t make widgets.  It has nothing to do with a general workforce.  The issue is whether the “rhubarb” rituals acted out by plsyers and umpires actualiy improve the product or not. 
This umpire performance was petty and vain imho and robs fans of seeing the product. Certainly order can be maintained without this 1900s era macho procedure and this  arbitrary ability of field umpires makes the game worse imho 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Horrible call. You can turn towards second.  Did he make any attempt to advance to 2B?  No.

"Provided he does not attempt or feint an advance to 2B".  Of course that's open to some interpretation. I just think the ump made a stupid interpretation. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could tell the vump had made up his mind to call Mancini out as soon as he turned toward the field instead of toward the dugout.   He followed Mancini back to the bag with his neck stretched out to see a tag and Mancinis foot.  The base coach had no part in this - the ump knew he was going to call him out as soon as Trey turned inside. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a bad call. But, Mancini was LAZY.... we teach LL'ers to turn away from 2nd base, Mancini did not. He also made no attempt to get back to bag quickly. Secondly, Mancini got mad after reviewing it on a dugout Ipod.  Just stupid, lazy baseball by Mancini, the umpire and the 1st base coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AlbNYfan said:

It was a bad call. But, Mancini was LAZY.... we teach LL'ers to turn away from 2nd base, Mancini did not. He also made no attempt to get back to bag quickly. Secondly, Mancini got mad after reviewing it on a dugout Ipod.  Just stupid, lazy baseball by Mancini, the umpire and the 1st base coach.

And a good play by the Catcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, it was. Good catchers will always make the just in case tag. Just like infielders do at 2nd and 3rd on tag plays. I suspect, at the Oakland Park you see catcher's more active because of the immense amount foul territory. You also see 2nd basemen moving to back up first on infield throws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Terrible call…they should fine the umpire

Fire him and donate his pension to Trey's charity.

That was a pure ego move by the ump.  If you closely at his pants while he is arguing with Hyde you can see something really itty bitty suddenly get hard.

Hint: rhymes with ejection.

Edited by yark14
Context
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Big Mac said:

If you see the slower motion replay of Mancini yelling from the dugout...he earned his ejection lol.  Not to say I wouldn't have likely reacted similarly. 

No matter what is being said from the dugout.. why the heck do umpires need to respond to it?  Nobody in the stands can hear it and it is not disrupting the game until an overly sensitive, traditional bound umpire walks over and makes it a show. 
 

NFL refs hear profanity ALL the time and do nothing to coaches 

Coach K was totally profane to refs ALL the time .. never got a T 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...