Jump to content

Are the O's turning a corner?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

They've turned a corner. Trouble, in my opinion,  it's the corner heading back down the ladder. A team that was fun to watch for a while is now awful. Someone please pick me up - I'm headed to "the dark side!"  I fear a real long losing streak to bring even the optimists here back to reality. I HOPE I AM WRONG!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turn the Corner?? I don't rant (usually). The game is simple, both teams get 27 outs.  Today's game, it was 27 outs vs 18. The O's need to play smart. Hayes sliding into first with two outs is DUMB baseball. I remember Earl talking about Fred Lynn crashing into a wall to make a play..Earl said something to the effect...you might make a great play, you crash and get injured and you are out for days. Rest???,  19 games in 18 days?? Play the game. I will NEVER say anyone in MLB sucks. I will say there are many that are looking for a last payday...I don't care for them on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GM does not care about fixing the day to day problem with the mlb roster. When you’re batting Ramon Urias 4th in your 4th year with the franchise it speaks alot. 
 

DD was great at day to to day roster management to help the big club. Elias has 4 years of just collecting draft picks and tanking. Where does this get us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The answer is the same.  This is the exact same team that looked very good against St. Louis and Minn.  It also is the same team that stranded 6000 runners last night without plating one.  This is a much improved team that has holes.  It's ability to win 67 games (15 game improvement) or more will depend on minimizing poor streaks.  In the meantime, the last two days are a reminder that winning 7 of 10 is a nice stretch, but the season is 162 games.

My answer was and still is, that we have begun the climb from the bottom and that it is still a very long way to the top.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Stars and Scrubs rundown, on the doorstep of perhaps pushing a 2-week average around 2 runs/game.

OPS+ 

Stars (lightly used in most cases): Hays 139, Mullins 130, Santander 119, Mancini 113, Mountcastle 107

Jorge Mateo 95, Ramon Urias 62 (on aggregate maybe not far from what I'd figured for this pair) 

Scrubs: Odor 62, Chirinos 41

Its a thin crust of goodish players even when they all clock in.    

Not that a catcher needs to have a 100 OPS+, but just simple math catcher performance team impact neutralizes all of Hays-Santander's nice LF/RF work to start the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Vlad Jr and Burnes....my priorities. Then you can trade Mayo for MMiller.
    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...