Jump to content

Eve Rosenbaum on the evolution of the Orioles’ hitting program


Frobby

Recommended Posts

From Fangraphs’ David Laurila:

Eve Rosenbaum was a featured guest on this week’s episode of FanGraphs Audio, and one of the topics I addressed with the Baltimore Orioles assistant general manager was the organization’s hitting-development program. I asked if there have been any directional shifts in terms of which data and training practices are most valued.

“One thing that I really stressed when I was the director of baseball development — which everyone was on board with here — is that we’re constantly learning,” responded Rosenbaum, who was promoted to her current position in June. “We’re constantly adjusting our hitting philosophies based on what we’ve learned. A huge thing we go back and forth on is how we balance power versus contact. The whole league has been working at this.… I was just talking to Koby Perez, our international scouting director, about it, how it impacts players he’s signed, and in the draft.

“At first, we were really focused on, ‘Hey, let’s develop a ton of power,’” continued Rosenbaum. “Then he said, ‘You know what, Eve? With some players, we should focus more on contact.’ But do you know what? Contact is really hard to develop, so maybe let’s roll that back and focus on, ‘How can we draft players that are already going to make a lot of contact, and then we can focus more on developing the power aspect. So, it’s a constant back and forth.”

  • Upvote 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The full interview can be found at this  link.  Here’s a description:

“At the top of the show, David Laurila welcomes Eve Rosenbaum, assistant general manager for the Baltimore Orioles. The former director of baseball development, Rosenbaum shares how her responsibilities have changed in her new role as she puts much more focus on the major league club. We also hear about the Orioles’ player development machine, the details of how waiver wires and DFAs work, how the team is making pitchers better after acquiring them, what they saw in Jorge Mateo, and insight as to why they made so many transactions during this encouraging season. [5:30]”

Sounds interesting.  I haven’t had time to listen to it yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Throwing batting practice in ways that we hadn’t thrown batting practice before. 

I don’t remember if this was mentioned in a previous thread, but can somebody expand on how the coaches throw batting practice in different ways? Do they attempt to mirror the delivery of that night’s opposing starter? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ShoelesJoe said:

I don’t remember if this was mentioned in a previous thread, but can somebody expand on how the coaches throw batting practice in different ways? Do they attempt to mirror the delivery of that night’s opposing starter? 

Yes, that’s what I recall.  They touted it as innovative at the time it was first discussed, tho several posters debated that it was anything new at all, maybe just new to us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, wildcard said:

Sounds muddled.

Maybe but I think the kernel of it is clear.

It's easier to develop power than to develop contact, so they are choosing to draft for contact and then develop the power.

We saw this pretty clearly with the Cowser-Norby draft and all the good K/BB ratios for that crop of batters. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for transcribing, @justD.   Listening to it, Eve comes off as positive, energetic and extremely intense.  I may have mentioned, she went to high school with my daughter.   

There wasn’t much earth shattering in the interview, but what I got out of it is:

1.  The O’s have decided it’s easier to get a contact hitter to develop power than it is to teach a power hitter to develop contact skills.   So, they’re inclining towards drafting guys who already have contact skills.   But how does that jive with drafting Beavers and Fabian?

2.  The O’s felt that to bring out Mateo’s defensive talent, they needed to put him at one position and let him stick there.   Well OK, but how does that jive with the way Henderson, Westburg and Vavra have been shuttled around?  I certainly got the impression they think they can develop Mateo offensively, but isn’t he a guy with some power but bad contact skills, the skill that’s difficult to teach?
 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Frobby said:

Thanks for transcribing, @justD.   Listening to it, Eve comes off as positive, energetic and extremely intense.  I may have mentioned, she went to high school with my daughter.   

There wasn’t much earth shattering in the interview, but what I got out of it is:

1.  The O’s have decided it’s easier to get a contact hitter to develop power than it is to teach a power hitter to develop contact skills.   So, they’re inclining towards drafting guys who already have contact skills.   But how does that jive with drafting Beavers and Fabian?

2.  The O’s felt that to bring out Mateo’s defensive talent, they needed to put him at one position and let him stick there.   Well OK, but how does that jive with the way Henderson, Westburg and Vavra have been shuttled around?  I certainly got the impression they think they can develop Mateo offensively, but isn’t he a guy with some power but bad contact skills, the skill that’s difficult to teach?
 

Perhaps the organization has matured from, "if you are a hammer everything's a nail," to "it's nice to have a number of tools hanging off my tool belt."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ShoelesJoe said:

I don’t remember if this was mentioned in a previous thread, but can somebody expand on how the coaches throw batting practice in different ways? Do they attempt to mirror the delivery of that night’s opposing starter? 

While not a game situation, batting practice still means pitching to a hitter.  You can work guys inside or outside, up or down.  You can throw a variety of pitch types.  You can tell the hitter what pitch type is coming or not tell him.  You can alternate who is throwing BP, so things like left or right handed, arm slot and delivery point are varied.  You can move the L screen up and throw from a shorter distance so speed and break are more similar to a game.  And so on.  There are several ways to differentiate batting practice to focus on specific areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This echoes a lot of what you see in the baseball development world at the you/high school/ collegiate levels.

Pitching side- everyone has a velocity program and velocity in prep/collegiate baseball is higher then ever.  Command of multiple pitches is the hardest component.

Every one wants the barrel to ball skill as the exit velocity can be attacked in the kitchen, weight room and rotational training, especially with over weight/under weight training. 

As a point of reference- Gunnar Henderson's exit velocity topped out at 93 mph 12 months before he has drafted.  

https://www.perfectgame.org/players/playerprofile.aspx?ID=460812

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

Perhaps the organization has matured from, "if you are a hammer everything's a nail," to "it's nice to have a number of tools hanging off my tool belt."

Absolutely.  But there's more to the story.  However, the metrics are incomplete too (at least publicly).  Which is why I really appreciated the humility of constantly learning.  It's good that we have a plan, but it's awesome that we're occasionally testing the foundations we build on.

Here's how I would frame the maturation process:

Pre-2019 - If you're a hammer, everything is a nail.  (Mountcastle)

2019-??? (now?) - Let's look for a hammer can make contact with nails.  We can teach them power.  (Cowser)

Future - What do we do with the screws?  How do we identify/develop the best screwdriver?

All of this is textbook analytics.  Measuring power and distance is relatively easy to get HRs (EV and LA - hit the ball hard at a certain angle).  Those same measures also 'tend' to increase the chances of the ball finding a hole (because it gives the defense less time to get to said hole).  Taken to its extreme, it creates the 'three true outcome' type of hitting approach (i.e. if you're a hammer, everything is a nail).  From a pitching perspective, spin rate and velocity are the key metrics.  Those are the most public metrics that a measurable that lead trend toward better results.  Companies like Driveline Baseball are applying biomechanical technology to see what players are doing to help players use 'best practices' (i.e. the actual swing or pitch motion).  It's relatively easy to see what a player is doing that gives a higher EV or optimizes the LA.  Then they would apply that in some type of "hitting or pitching lab" as they tweak their swing/pitch motion.  Each player would have a goal (gain 2 MPH in pitch velo, 10 MPH in exit velo, or whatever).  Goals are measurable and management can see who's meeting their goals (just like most business environments).

But there are plenty of quality players who are not power hitters who are being missed or not developed to their full potential (or even messed up).  We know hitting is so much more than just hitting the ball hard at a certain angle.  But it's tougher to measure.  It's a "known unknown" (we know it's there but we're not sure exactly what it is).  Until those unknows are clarified, we can target those who already have "it" (contact skills) and teach things like pitch selection and swing decisions.  And increase repetitions that mimic game situations (like BP with MLB-type pitching instead of 75 MPH meatballs).

Guys like Gwynn, Boggs, McNeil (Vavra?) are guys that aren't about hard contact but quality of contact.  They applied the "it" factors to make themselves high BA/OBP guys.  But what exactly do they do?  Are there technology gaps?  How do you measure it?  Once you can measure it, how can it be applied/repeated in the next hitter?  And maybe it can't?  Is it general "athleticism"?  That's the next frontier toward better hitting.  

The other day I posted a Fangraphs article that focused on Jeff McNeil in another thread that talked about how McNeil doesn't fit the mold of the current trends in hitting.

Jeff McNeil Swings Softly, But Carries a Big Stick | FanGraphs Baseball

 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, wildcard said:

Sounds muddled.

Sounds realistic and honest. And scientifically-minded. Constant tweaking, constant adjusting. I've been waiting for this fact-based, evidence-based development in this organization for more than a decade. We finally have smart, credible, improvement-minded people working at development who actually give a shit. They aren't just trying to form everyone into some dumb mold some ancient baseball idiot thought made sense for reasons. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • I would agree.  Not sure if he can pitch this season or not (probably not), but the way they do that surgery now along with the healing powers of platelet injections?    A pitcher can be back throwing and almost 100% within 8 months.  I have the exact same injury as Felix along with a bone chip in my right elbow and I was told if I have the surgery I will feel basically brand new after 6-8 months.   Granted I am not trying to throw 95 MPH 8 months later.
    • Ding ding ding. It’s the crab pot mentality. Most will drag you back to the bottom rather than allow others to climb out to freedom. It’s the old misery loves company.   Sadly for my Orioles fans, they have used this misery as a warm blanket and have even rationalized their sorrow by way of linking up with other sorrowful fans. It’s a sort of companionship in misery. Suddenly the orioles start to do well, as if this wasn’t the plan by Elias all along, and many orioles fans are still clinging to their long held beliefs that the shoe will drop, that the end is nigh, and that success will all come crashing down.   After all, failure is what they have grown accustomed to, it’s all they know, their world is an abject failure, so when the team they love suddenly starts doing well…they have no idea what to do. They lash out. They find fault where there is none, and their extreme uncomfort becomes full display to all those who might say “yeah but we’re good now, things are good now” but that simply can not be so. There must be something wrong. The shoe will drop. The loss will happen. My life is not fulfilled without the thumping of the chest from the loser Oriole who proclaims to his tribe, “see, I told you so!” sad sacks of shit, the lot of them!
    • Another MLB player, once a teammate and friend of Ohtani, maybe tied to gambling. I didn't bother to try to understand the exact timeline or tie to Ohtani, which seems to be just as friends, but here it is for anyone interested. https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/40166891/angels-david-fletcher-bet-bookie
    • Not for someone who has money riding on him winning the award.
    • Well, now that we’ve established the hitting sucks, is it a good time to complain that this pitching is obviously over performing and will crash and burn any day now?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...