Jump to content

G-Rod Debut Date?


yark14

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

We should melt down if it happens.  Elias admitted a lack of evidence supporting inning caps.

I'm really hoping that the Orioles do not have him on an innings cap. He's pitching at 23 years old this year, time to let him do his thing. Saying that, Elias' M.O. is to gain as much service time as he can with his high value prospects so I would not be surprised with him starting the year on the IL or sent down to "work on something" until they gain the extra year.

This would also allow the Wells-Voth situation have more time to conclude.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I'm really hoping that the Orioles do not have him on an innings cap. He's pitching at 23 years old this year, time to let him do his thing. Saying that, Elias' M.O. is to gain as much service time as he can with his high value prospects so I would not be surprised with him starting the year on the IL or sent down to "work on something" until they gain the extra year.

This would also allow the Wells-Voth situation have more time to conclude.

Would it be possible/has it ever been done, where someone files a grievance with the players association in a situation like this?  It would be very difficult to prove service time manipulation, even if the optics look as though that is what is going on. Even if the hypothetical kid is like, “No big deal, whatever is best for the team.”, their agent and the players association are suppose to advocate for the player. 
Saying all of this, I am very much a capitalist and take the owners side on these issues. When it comes down to it though, I think what is best for the team is having Grayson on the opening day roster and winning as many games as possible this year for a playoff run. Who is to say the current ownership is the same ownership 7 years from now and is Elias going to be the GM then?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless Grayson is injured or struggles the rest of spring training, then he will be on the Orioles roster on opening day. Elias has basically said this multiple times. They wanted him to pitch in the majors last year. If they send Grayson down to start the year, then I will definitely ask to speak to the manager. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, sevastras said:

Would it be possible/has it ever been done, where someone files a grievance with the players association in a situation like this?  It would be very difficult to prove service time manipulation, even if the optics look as though that is what is going on. Even if the hypothetical kid is like, “No big deal, whatever is best for the team.”, their agent and the players association are suppose to advocate for the player. 
Saying all of this, I am very much a capitalist and take the owners side on these issues. When it comes down to it though, I think what is best for the team is having Grayson on the opening day roster and winning as many games as possible this year for a playoff run. Who is to say the current ownership is the same ownership 7 years from now and is Elias going to be the GM then?  

I guess at the end of the day, this service time manipulation should have really been negotiated better by the players union at the last collective bargaining agreement.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, sevastras said:

Would it be possible/has it ever been done, where someone files a grievance with the players association in a situation like this?  It would be very difficult to prove service time manipulation, even if the optics look as though that is what is going on. Even if the hypothetical kid is like, “No big deal, whatever is best for the team.”, their agent and the players association are suppose to advocate for the player. 
Saying all of this, I am very much a capitalist and take the owners side on these issues. When it comes down to it though, I think what is best for the team is having Grayson on the opening day roster and winning as many games as possible this year for a playoff run. Who is to say the current ownership is the same ownership 7 years from now and is Elias going to be the GM then?  

Kris Bryant filed a grievance about it and the Cubs were almost 100% gaming his service time.  He ended up losing though.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the folks guessing he's starting in the minors, is there any specific reason other than a general assumption the O's will try to game service time with guys? 

To me Elias' comments have all but stated that Rodriguez is an expected member of the team. He was likely within a week or two of getting called up last summer. They didn't really do any service time shenanigans with Henderson. It's not clear they did any with Rutschman either-- they may have been overly cautious about his injury but I don't think they made it up. And if it was service time related, the team was in a completely different competitive situation then. 

I think they will want all of his innings this year to come where they are most valuable, and that's on the big league club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Mooreisbetter27 said:

Kris Bryant filed a grievance about it and the Cubs were almost 100% gaming his service time.  He ended up losing though.  

Not only that, they call him up the very next day after they were assured the extra year of team control.  Bryant took it to an arbitrator and lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

For the folks guessing he's starting in the minors, is there any specific reason other than a general assumption the O's will try to game service time with guys? 

At this point, to me, if he's not injured and not on the ML roster on Opening Day, is it 100% Elias manipulating his service time.

I look at it like this. Is it better to have him for the first 14 days of 2023 or is it better to have another year of team control? If he develops into 90% of what we're hoping he's going to be, that year of control is going to be huge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a little more optimistic having heard recently OD Roster competitors for bonus draft picks don't necessarily have to stay on the roster all year.    If his first couple months are okay not great, it could get interesting.     The 2023 team does need him more in the time of Means' absence and before anything that could happen trade-wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can we just let the guy pitch in spring training before declaring whether he must or will be on the team?   He looked good in his first outing.   Hopefully he keeps it up.   If he does, he’ll be on the team.  If he doesn’t, maybe he won’t, depending on what others do.   He’s not in a position where he can look like crap this spring and they put him in the rotation anyway.  But, it’s his job to lose.   Let’s hope he pitches well, and that will be that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, eddie83 said:

Elias is usually guarded and he all but told everyone Grayson will be on the club. 
 

If he was planning on being cute with his service time I don’t know why at every turn he has been so chatty about it. 

I completely agree with this. Elias has not hinted like literally at all about him starting the year in AAA. Every single time that the topic has come up, he has said that the plan is for him to make the Opening Day roster. As much as the "wheels up" comments kind of backfired on him, I can't imagine him going from that, to saying that that's the plan with Grayson, just for him to start the year in AAA anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...