Jump to content

Looks like this is how the rotation shakes out


interloper

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I think it does to the extent that he struggled some in the spring and now it gives them an excuse.

That said, if he pitches well, he’s on the OD roster.

I also think the early season schedule has something to do with it. 

This is where I'm at. If he pitched well this spring, he goes North. He did not and it gave the org every reason to be able to send him back to not only iron out his command and breaking ball issues, but also potentially gain some service time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

I think that's credible.   I'm disappointed but I also understand it.    Wells pitched well last year and his last two starts down here were good.   It would be tough telling him he didn't make the rotation.    The question is, what if Rodriguez dominates and all 5 starters are pitching decently during April and May.

That's a long shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

You don't think this made their decision easier for them?  

Ok.

Sure it did, but it wasn't the primary motivation. I think they'd rather Rodriguez look like the #1 pitcher prospect and force his way into the rotation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Sure it did, but it wasn't the primary motivation. I think they'd rather Rodriguez look like the #1 pitcher prospect and force his way into the rotation. 

I don't know if this was *the* primary motivation but I believe it certainly was *a* primary motivation.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, wildcard said:

That's a long shot.

It's a long shot that all 5 starters are pitching decently?    Ok.    I don't think they are going to replace one of them unless they are really struggling and pitchers like Gibson and Irvin are going to get a lot of rope.    It's going to take an injury and someone struggling really bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LookinUp said:

If it's not primary, isn't it secondary?

Semantics.

I do believe they would look for any/every opportunity to send him down and he didn't hesitate to give it to them.  You and I and everyone else here knows that he doesn't have anything left to prove in the minors.  There was a good chance he could have been up last year if it weren't for the lat strain.

So he's had a subpar spring training, so what?  I'd prefer to see him work through any command/breaking ball issues at the ML level.  But, the almighty service time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

It's a long shot that all 5 starters are pitching decently?    Ok.    I don't think they are going to replace one of them unless they are really struggling and pitchers like Gibson and Irvin are going to get a lot of rope.    It's going to take an injury and someone struggling really bad.

These 5 starters staying healthy and pitching well for 2 months is a long shot IMO.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This could end up making our rotation stronger in the long run. 

We could get a large enough sample from the five starters who break with the club, to determine which one would best belong in the pen.  I'm not convinced it is Wells, but this could give us a chance to find out. 

Just as likely, one of them makes a trip to the DL before May and we see Grayson that way. 

Edited by ChuckS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

These 5 starters staying healthy and pitching well for 2 months is a long shot IMO.

 You are probably right.  We'll see.   If they do stay healthy and none of them implode AND GRod is lights out in Norfolk, it could get interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kremer showed flashes but didn’t have consistent control today.  One too many meatball slurves left out over the plate.  Jordan Walker also just nearly missed a mammoth HR on a hanger.   Like everyone, a bit concerned about the SP.  Maybe would’ve been a good idea to look for some upgrades during the off-season, eh?

Can’t argue with the GRod decision, but it’s disappointing.  Need more upside in this rotation if this team actually wants to be any good.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Emory Eagle said:

Kremer showed flashes but didn’t have consistent control today.  One too many meatball slurves left out over the plate.  Jordan Walker also just nearly missed a mammoth HR on a hanger.   Like everyone, a bit concerned about the SP.  Maybe would’ve been a good idea to look for some upgrades during the off-season, eh?

Can’t argue with the GRod decision, but it’s disappointing.  Need more upside in this rotation if this team actually wants to be any good.

Kremer did fine for 4 innings.   Tired in the 5th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
    • What if they don’t want to be extended?
    • I don't want the O's to lose much, but I do want there to be a massive streaming deal with Amazon or some other company the O's are left out of.  This blackout nonsense is bullsh!t. 🤬
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...