Jump to content

Westburg is near ready


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Elias has shifted into win mode.  He said we promote our top prospects when they are ready and mentioned Adley and Gunnar.

Westburg had a 869 OPS at Norfolk and an 878 OPS in ST.   The only thing that is keeping him off the major league roster is 17 days of service time.   So if he continues to hit for the first  2+ weeks at AAA he is probably  called up to play 2B.

Do I think they bench Frazier?   Yes I do.    Frazier is a league average 2nd baseman if you look at his career numbers.   Westburg's 800+  OPS projection is above average.  His defense at 2B probably matches Frazier's.  He will be an upgrade in the near future.   8M will not stand in Elias way if the possibility of winning is involved IMO.

Who goes to make room for Westburg?   Guys with options could be shifted to AAA.    We have just seen Santander become the backup 1B when he  is in not playing RF/DH.    We could see Mateo become the backup CF when he is not at SS.   McKenna has an option. Vavra also has an option.  

A year ago we saw Elias trade Scott and Sulser on April 3rd because he believed he had better relievers.   Frazier and Urias should take note of Westburg's progress.  That trade may be harder to do than shifting players to AAA.

Beware.  The O's are in win mode.  That means putting the best players on the field.   Comments from Elias makes me think he is serious about that.

Edited by wildcard
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • wildcard changed the title to Westburg is near ready

You still have both Mateo and Urias before Frazier was added. Both were regulars last year.  
 

If Elias thought Westburg was as good defensively as Frazier and was 800+ OPS lock then why did he sign Frazier? 
 

Westburg may become all of these things but it’s not happening a couple of weeks into the season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

You still have both Mateo and Urias before Frazier was added. Both were regulars last year.  
 

If Elias thought Westburg was as good defensively as Frazier and was 800+ OPS lock then why did he sign Frazier? 
 

Westburg may become all of these things but it’s not happening a couple of weeks into the season. 

Seriously, he spent 8 million for 17 days as a regular? @wildcardis kidding himself unless Elias has a deal in place to purge one off the roster. And I seriously doubt that as we watched his refusal to dump the much cheaper Odor last year.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Roll Tide said:

Seriously, he spent 8 million for 17 days as a regular? @wildcardis kidding himself unless Elias has a deal in place to purge one off the roster. And I seriously doubt that as we watched his refusal to dump the much cheaper Odor last year.

I agree with him from the standpoint he will pull the plug on Frazier if needed but no way that early on. 

I think the club is in a good spot here. Plenty of options. The situation will take care of itself. Requires patience. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eddie83 said:

I agree with him from the standpoint he will pull the plug on Frazier if needed but no way that early on. 

I think the club is in a good spot here. Plenty of options. The situation will take care of itself. Requires patience. 

I agree …. Except on their ability to dump players under Angelos. I think Frazier is here most if not all of the season. Many are going to hate this but as I mentioned, Davis was hung onto far too long and Odor who was by all account terrible hung on like a bad fungus. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Roll Tide said:

I agree …. Except on their ability to dump players under Angelos. I think Frazier is here most if not all of the season. Many are going to hate this but as I mentioned, Davis was hung onto far too long and Odor who was by all account terrible hung on like a bad fungus. 

When I say pull the plug on Frazier I’m not talking about him off the roster. I’m saying his at bats get limited. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Elias has shifted into win mode.  He said we promote our top prospects when they are ready and mentioned Adley and Gunnar.

Westburg had a 869 OPS at Norfolk and an 878 OPS in ST.   The only thing that is keeping him off the major league roster is 17 days of service time.   So if he continues to hit for the first  2+ weeks at AAA he is probably  called up to play 2B.

Do I think they bench Frazier?   Yes I do.    Frazier is a league average 2nd baseman if you look at his career numbers.   Westburg's 800+  OPS projection is above average.  His defense at 2B probably matches Frazier's.  He will be an upgrade in the near future.   8M will not stand in Elias way if the possibility of winning is involved IMO.

Who goes to make room for Westburg?   Guys with options could be shifted to AAA.    We have just seen Santander become the backup 1B when he  is in not playing RF/DH.    We could see Mateo become the backup CF when he is not at SS.   McKenna has an option. Vavra also has an option.  

A year ago we saw Elias trade Scott and Sulser on April 3rd because he believed he had better relievers.   Frazier and Urias should take note of Westburg's progress.  That trade may be harder to do than shifting players to AAA.

Beware.  The O's are in win mode.  That means putting the best players on the field.   Comments from Elias makes me think he is serious about that.

His comments may make you feel that way but his actions shouldn't.

 

For the thousandths time, they did not sign Frazier to not play. I agree that Mateo could potentially be a backup CF and McKenna could be optioned. That still leaves Henderson, Urias, Frazier, and Mateo looking for starts in the infield. 

 

There's just not enough playing time to justify bringing him up. If they do, they need to have him starting pretty much everyday.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no way he's pulling the plug on 8 million Frazier when he didn't pull the plug on 700k Rougned Odor last year.  Odor doesn't bring the versatility (Frazier can stand around in the outfield, BFD) that Frazier does so he's going to be more inclined to make us suffer the entire season.

Frazier should have never been signed, Westburg should have had to battle it out in camp for the role.  But I agree with SG, he was ready late last year.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My message is  "Wake Up" and understand what is happening now.

Elias as more information now.   A month more.

Elias just sent Grayson to AAA.  Why?  Because he had 5 starters that are better.   In SPRING TRAINING.    You think ST does not matter?   It mattered to Elias and Grayson.

A month ago Elias didn't know how Westburg would do in ST.  Now he does.  878 OPS.  

A month ago Elias didn't know how Frazier would do in ST.  Now he does.  597 OPS.

I would think that Frazier would want to impress his new manager, coaches and teammates.  And that he would know he is competing for playing time at 2nd base with Urias, Vavra, Westburg and Ortiz.   597 is not going to cut it.

 ST mattered to Elias and Grayson about starting.   Why would it not matter about 2nd base?

I think Frazier has 17 days to turn it around.   Do I know its 17 days?  No.  It could be 30 days.  But Elias knows that last year the team went 7-14 in April.  And he does not want that to happen again.

Elias is in win mode.   He will play his best players.  And he is going to pay the 8m whether Frazier starts a lot or a little.   The important thing is to win.

 

Edited by wildcard
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I certainly don't disagree that Westburg is ready.  But I do disagree that we will see him up soon as we stupidly have Frazier on the roster, and with 8M tied up in him, he isn't going to be cut or even be riding on the bench much.  It's foolish and headscratching, but it is what it is at this point.  Better guys will be stuck in the minors (Westburg, Ortiz) because we have the MLB roster clogged with guys that should have never been signed (Frazier) or should be moved IMO (Mateo).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

My message is  "Wake Up" and understand what is happening now

Elias as more information now.   A month more.

Elias just sent Grayson to AAA.  Why?  Because he had 5 starters that are better.   In SPRING TRAINING.    You think ST does not matter?   It mattered to Elias and Grayson.

A month ago Elias didn't know how Westburg would do in ST.  Now he does.  878 OPS.  

A month ago Elias didn't know how Frazier would do in ST.  Now he does.  597 OPS.

I would think that Frazier would want to impress his new manager, coaches and teammates.  And that he would know he is competing for playing time at 2nd base with Urias, Vavra, Westburg and Ortiz.   597 is not going to cut it.

 ST mattered to Elias and Grayson about starting.   Why would it not matter about 2nd base?

I think Frazier has 17 days to turn it around.   Do I know its 17 days?  No.  It could be 30 days.  But Elias knows that last year the team went 7-14 in April.  And he does not want that to happen again.

Elias is in win mode.   He will play his best players.  And he is going to pay the 8m whether Frazier starts a lot or a little.   The important thing is to win.

 

Your continued overrating of ST continues to amaze me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

I certainly don't disagree that Westburg is ready.  But I do disagree that we will see him up soon as we stupidly have Frazier on the roster, and with 8M tied up in him, he isn't going to be cut or even be riding on the bench much.  It's foolish and headscratching, but it is what it is at this point.  Better guys will be stuck in the minors (Westburg, Ortiz) because we have the MLB roster clogged with guys that should have never been signed (Frazier) or should be moved IMO (Mateo).  

Here is the thing. It’s possible Westburg is up soon. They move him between second and third (Gunnar plays SS). He plays 3-5 times a week up here.

Thats possible.

However, if that happens, Frazier is still taking at bats from Stowers, Hays and Ortiz. The Frazier move doesn’t just impact Westburg. He impacts so many players.

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
    • What if they don’t want to be extended?
    • I don't want the O's to lose much, but I do want there to be a massive streaming deal with Amazon or some other company the O's are left out of.  This blackout nonsense is bullsh!t. 🤬
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...