Jump to content

Very, very way too early thoughts


eddie83

Recommended Posts

What’s frustrating is this is an example that I’m sure the front office could point to and say “see, they’re not ready” but if they had invested in some actual pitching then we might be looking at a better opening weekend.

Anyways, not gonna kill us to start the season 1-2. I still think they finish around .500 when all is said and done 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team looks a lot like the team that crumbled in September and October last year, and not at all like the team that rolled through June, July and August. These three games were very reminiscent to the Jays and Red Sox games end of last year where we couldnt get anyone out. Not sure what is up with the defense. That was solid all year last year. Definitely concerning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baker looked much better today.

Baumann is going to take some patience like Baker did last year.   
 

I thought Irvin looked good.   He left too many curves up to lefties but I think he’s going to be good.

Super sloppy defense in this series.  It won’t continue.

I was worried about two dead spots in the lineup with Mateo and Frazier.   Maybe not.

I voted this team for 79-82 wins but I like what I see so far.   It comes down to the starting pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Way too early to have any meaningful thoughts. I didn’t expect the pitching to be great but I also didn’t see this defense being this pathetic. 

So you’re thoughts on the defense are pretty meaningless,right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm... so admittedly I'm behind on the thoughts here generally about the team this year, but.... man, we have two people here predicting this is a .500 team in 2023 when the O's were supposed to be, under Elias's grand plan, ready to start seriously competing for a deep playoff run and maybe even a championship. This seems to indicate the plan hasn't gone so well, but I know how passionate people are and how "up-and-down" the emotions can be, but is this an accurate gauge on how people generally feel about this team right now? In 2023, we're still not expecting better than a .500 team? Perhaps this is just frustration due to the rough start?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, oriole said:

What’s frustrating is this is an example that I’m sure the front office could point to and say “see, they’re not ready” but if they had invested in some actual pitching then we might be looking at a better opening weekend.

Anyways, not gonna kill us to start the season 1-2. I still think they finish around .500 when all is said and done 

Well, as long as we're talking "way too early," I was updating the game thread with the performance of three free agent guys that people had talked about maybe signing to upgrade the pitching.

Ross Stripling vs. Yankees: 5.0 IP 6 H 4 ER 3 HR 2 BB 3 K

Jameson Taillon vs. Brewers: 4.0 IP 7 H 3 ER 0 HR 1 BB 2 K

Chris Bassitt vs. Cardinals: 3.1 IP 10 H 9 ER 4 HR 0 BB 0 K

The most expensive guy made Gibson and Irvin look like Maddux and Smoltz. Taijuan Walker was also available, andhe goes tomorrow against the Yankees, so we'll see how he looks.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sessh said:

Hmm... so admittedly I'm behind on the thoughts here generally about the team this year, but.... man, we have two people here predicting this is a .500 team in 2023 when the O's were supposed to be, under Elias's grand plan, ready to start seriously competing for a deep playoff run and maybe even a championship. This seems to indicate the plan hasn't gone so well, but I know how passionate people are and how "up-and-down" the emotions can be, but is this an accurate gauge on how people generally feel about this team right now? In 2023, we're still not expecting better than a .500 team? Perhaps this is just frustration due to the rough start?

It's only year five.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The games in April count as much in the standings as the games in Sept. so pointing out  that this is a rotten team is appropriate if that is the fact, which IMO, it is.  Can they improve as the season wears on, of course.  But we  all know the AL East in an unforgiving Division.  Not adding impact players, yes plural, already shows.  I hope they improve as the season goes by, but I do not see facts that would support that statement.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...