Jump to content

Food prices at Camden Yards


Going Underground

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Jack Daniels and Jameson are the only whiskeys available on the lower level concourse. 

I need a better whiskey selection, to improve most post game message boarding.

Can you throw a little bottle in your 'carry in'? Do they ever check for that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Rbiggs2525 said:

Our attendance would go up if they started lowering concession prices and bleacher seats. Let fans spend 20-30$ to get a ticket, beer and hot dog. 

They do let you bring in food. I go to enough games on a membership plan that it’s not worth buying inside and I always bring a big hoagie or something.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

If anyone sees that man outside the stadium with a bullhorn yelling "Ice ice cold waterrrr.... Only one dollarrrr!" tell him F*<&Face says "Hi, and thank you."

Even he raised his prices

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, KojiSplit said:

In regards to the general topic, I’ve stopped buying food and beer at nearly any sporting event I go to as the prices are outrageous especially at the walgreen where it’s $24 for craft beer.

Some parks still offer cheap food and beer like the Braves and when I was at Mariners game few weeks ago, beers were $4,5,6 all game.

Wait... you're telling me the Nats charge $24 for a single craft beer?  A few years ago I was in LA and I got a Dodger dog and a beer (I forget what kind) and it was $20 and I thought that was extortionist. I was kind of shocked when the Angels were charging $14 for a beer, and FedEx was long infamous for $11 cans of Miller Light. $24 should make the Nats owners cower in shame. That's basically like a soda machine where a Dr. Pepper is $11. They might as well have some kind of huge goon standing next to the concessions yelling out "hey yous, the beers are $24. If you don't like it, get the hell out of my stadium!"

I have heard that Atlanta is great for food prices. The Mercedes dome... thing... has the cheapest food and drink in MLS. I suppose the Braves are copying them. Good for them.

Aside from Atlanta, this feeds into the narrative that American sports are for upper and upper-middle-class people. Others need not come. Which is fine in a vacuum, fine for some kind of economics class experiment, fine for owners whose primary goal is short-term profits. But what happens down the road when the fanbase doesn't really include people who're not making six figures? Or since nearly all US sports are doing this, that a significant percentage of the population just doesn't regularly go to live sports because it's outrageously expensive? Like I mentioned, me, the wife, and two kids going to DC United on Saturday and the total bill will probably be $350, and that's with discounted tickets and if I can park at Ft. McNair next to the stadium for free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Some of these prices are done to get people to get season tickets.

Now, the discounts still make the items expensive but it helps. Guarantee there is some of that motivation behind it.

I doubt many of the fans without season tickets even know season ticket holders are getting a discount 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today on a 1 o’clock game the lowest ticket price is 24$. If I wanted to take my son,  48$ nose bleed seat, 30$ parking, 30$ on 2 meals, 30$ 2 beers. We will have 20,000 fans if we are lucky and 5000 will be Yankees fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Rbiggs2525 said:

Today on a 1 o’clock game the lowest ticket price is 24$. If I wanted to take my son,  48$ nose bleed seat, 30$ parking, 30$ on 2 meals, 30$ 2 beers. We will have 20,000 fans if we are lucky and 5000 will be Yankees fans.

Bleacher seats are $12 Mon-Thursday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Rbiggs2525 said:

Today on a 1 o’clock game the lowest ticket price is 24$. If I wanted to take my son,  48$ nose bleed seat, 30$ parking, 30$ on 2 meals, 30$ 2 beers. We will have 20,000 fans if we are lucky and 5000 will be Yankees fans.

You can get really nice upper box seats for you and your son with the kids free program. You can sit in 360 row 2 for about $40 total.

My daughter is too young to go to a baseball game but I use this when taking my nephews and niece.

https://www.mlb.com/orioles/fans/kids/cheer-free

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Any event you go to the food prices are crazy. 
 

Unlike many events though, you can bring food into the park, which helps. 

I’ve taken to doing this routinely.  Peanuts, a sandwich and a bottle of water.   I do pay for a beer or two once inside.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Bleacher seats are $12 Mon-Thursday 

I think todays a premium game of sorts and the $12 seats aren’t available.

Would love to be wrong about though, given that I’m playing hooky and walking over to the game today and haven’t purchased my tickets yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I think the customer experience for concessions is just as bad, or worse, than the prices.

All the new self checkout stuff sucks, and is totally pointless when you have an employee standing right over you when you do it.

Edited by DirtyBird
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...