Jump to content

Yennier Canó 2023


OsFanSinceThe80s

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

@baltfan

I'm assuming it's this stretch:  

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/gl.fcgi?id=gossari01&t=p&year=1980#401-414-sum:pitching_gamelogs

14 games, 20.1 innings pitched, 4 hits, 27 strikeouts, 5 walks, 10 saves.  

Not quite sure why that is necessarily better than Cano.

I will say it's great to enjoy this but relievers can get hot.  Phil Maton of the Astros has a 1.00 ERA with 19K's and a .39 WHIP (6 hits and a walk) in his 18 innings this year.  Maton isn't exactly a historically standout reliever.  I understand that his Baseball Savant page doesn't look like Cano's (it's still pretty impressive) and am not trying to rain on the parade but this does show you can't know for sure.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Frobby said:

You do have to wonder how long the glass slipper stays on his foot.   Nobody’s this good.  But, he certainly seems like he’s got the stuff to be an excellent back end reliever.  

It really reminds me of Zach(k) Britton's Cy Young-contending 2016. 

0.54 ERA, 0.836 WHIP, 47 saves. 4.1 WAR as a freaking relief pitcher. 

Just an incredible season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, wildcard said:

29 teams could have traded for Cano.  But Elias DID.  Actions speak louder than words.   

And it was Holt's pitching system that got Cano to make the adjustments to turn him into the pitcher  we are watching.  He was not this pitcher when he was was the Twins.

Hmmmm....Yennier Cano might be Chris Holt's Patronus.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Frobby said:

You do have to wonder how long the glass slipper stays on his foot.   Nobody’s this good.  But, he certainly seems like he’s got the stuff to be an excellent back end reliever.  

A cautionary tale is Cesar Valdez's performance with the Orioles after a 22-game  stretch 2020-21. Not quite as magnificent as Cano has been, but superb nonetheless and bewildering to hitters in a somewhat similar way in terms of his delivery and part of his pitch repertoire--until he got figured out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, interloper said:

It really reminds me of Zach(k) Britton's Cy Young-contending 2016. 

0.54 ERA, 0.836 WHIP, 47 saves. 4.1 WAR as a freaking relief pitcher. 

Just an incredible season. 

He worked out of jams frequently that year.  This is so different because Cano is never in trouble and throws so many strikes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever happens with Cano, he will have really factored into our good start. It feels like we're playing with house money right now. Hopefully, if he implodes suddenly, we'll have Givens ready to step in, or Perez will suddenly figure it out again. Not gonna worry about it until it happens though. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, interloper said:

It really reminds me of Zach(k) Britton's Cy Young-contending 2016. 

0.54 ERA, 0.836 WHIP, 47 saves. 4.1 WAR as a freaking relief pitcher. 

Just an incredible season. 

Yeah, and he topped it off with that gutsy and gritty 3 inning performance in the wild card game.

 

Oh, Wait.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LA2 said:

A cautionary tale is Cesar Valdez's performance with the Orioles after a 22-game  stretch 2020-21. Not quite as magnificent as Cano has been, but superb nonetheless and bewildering to hitters in a somewhat similar way in terms of his delivery and part of his pitch repertoire--until he got figured out.

I think Cano is going to be way tougher to figure out.  He’s throwing a lot harder, and even when batters hit the ball in the strike zone, they can’t get it in the air.  By contrast, once major league hitters realized that most of Valdez’s pitches weren’t strikes, they started laying off anything that didn’t start out waist-high and just crushed him when he did throw there.   

Speaking of Valdez, he was called up by the Angels the other day, but didn’t pitch in a game and then was DFA.   He was lights out in the Dominican Winter League (and has been for several years), and I believe was MVP of the Caribbean World Series this winter, appearing as a starting pitcher.  I won’t be that shocked if he te-emerges in the majors at some point.  
 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, baltfan said:

He worked out of jams frequently that year.  This is so different because Cano is never in trouble and throws so many strikes.  

“Frequently?”  With an 0.836 WHIP, I’d say not.  

Cano has been great, and this stretch may be better than any stretch Britton had in 2016.  But at the end of the day, doing it for four weeks is not the same as doing it for a year.   I’m very confident Cano’s not getting through a full season completely unscathed.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, LA2 said:

A cautionary tale is Cesar Valdez's performance with the Orioles after a 22-game  stretch 2020-21. Not quite as magnificent as Cano has been, but superb nonetheless and bewildering to hitters in a somewhat similar way in terms of his delivery and part of his pitch repertoire--until he got figured out.

Decent point but Valdez also only had one pitch.  This is like if you gave Valdez an elite sinker in addition to the change.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zack Britton is a better comparison than Valdez. Cano's sinker may be about as good, not quite at Britton's 2016 groundball rate (76.5% vs 80%) but pretty close, more like his 2014 level. Cano's secondary pitch has been a lot more effective than Britton's slider.

The GB% makes me optimistic that even if his command regresses a little, he can still get out of jams by inducing DPs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think Cano is going to be way tougher to figure out.  He’s throwing a lot harder, and even when batters hit the ball in the strike zone, they can’t get it in the air.  By contrast, once major league hitters realized that most of Valdez’s pitches weren’t strikes, they started laying off anything that didn’t start out waist-high and just crushed him when he did throw there.   

Speaking of Valdez, he was called up by the Angels the other day, but didn’t pitch in a game and then was DFA.   He was lights out in the Dominican Winter League (and has been for several years), and I believe was MVP of the Caribbean World Series this winter, appearing as a starting pitcher.  I won’t be that shocked if he te-emerges in the majors at some point.  
 

Maybe.  But he also is 38 at this point.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...