Jump to content

Dodgers are getting desperate at SS


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

Just now, interloper said:

All I want for Urias is a good 7th inning arm and a prospect. 

A frickin men. I'd be thrilled with that return. I wonder if the Dodgers would consider trading Graterol?I think I'd make that trade straight up w/out a prospect, if they'd do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, HandsomeQuack said:

Mateo is also three weeks of good baseball removed from a .267 OBP and .646 OPS. I do buy his offensive improvements this year, but I don't know that the Dodgers would pay much more than a lottery ticket prospect for him at this point.

Well, he was a 3.5 rWAR player last year despite his paltry offensive numbers, so it’s not like the Dodgers would be acquiring a player whose only value was derived from a three-week heater.  But obviously the return from the trade would partially depend on whether the Dodgers (and the Orioles) believe that Mateo’s offensive improvement is at least partially sustainable.

FWIW, before the season ZiPS pegged Mateo’s median projection at .670 OPS, 89 wRC+.   Now, ZiPS projects the rest of his season (not including the games already played) at .698 OPS, 97 wRC+.  So, ZiPS believes that at least some of the improvement is real, though not most of it.   With the 17 games already played, that would put Mateo’s full season numbers in the range of .738 OPS, 107 wRC+.   

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HandsomeQuack said:

He has too much positional versatility and team control for that. But it would depend on the caliber of prospect, of course.

I dunno. I think trying to get a SP that we'd actually plug into the rotation over our current candidates is a bit of a stretch. I do get it because of the GG, the 3+ WAR last year, the years of control, etc. But he's basically a super utility guy at the end of the day. I just think if you can get a shutdown reliever for him, that fills your biggest need while creating room for Westburg or Ortiz. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, interloper said:

I dunno. I think trying to get a SP that we'd actually plug into the rotation over our current candidates is a bit of a stretch. I do get it because of the GG, the 3+ WAR last year, the years of control, etc. But he's basically a super utility guy at the end of the day. I just think if you can get a shutdown reliever for him, that fills your biggest need while creating room for Westburg or Ortiz. 

If the reliever is really good or the prospect is a pitcher and (close to) ML-ready then I agree that they should consider it. But he is valuable enough in his current role that I wouldn't move him for moving him sake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

We can't trade Mateo now. But I think that's mostly because of what he's doing offensively, not defensively. If he had regressed to being more of a defensive specialist, as some of us had expected (raises hand), then I think trading him for pitching and replacing him with another solid defensive player (in Urias) would have been worth exploring. It's a moot point now, but they should defniitely be shopping Urias. 

Mateo playing well may increase his odds of being traded, or it should at least.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • If we put Mounty on the IL he’d be back next Weds, and he’d only miss one start versus a LH SP in Oakland. It might be a good chance to take a look at Mayo.  It would probably be better to start LH Kjerstad and O’Hearn against the Seattle SP and roll with Mayo at 3B and Westburg at 2B. That would be our best LH offensive lineup.  For the Seattle series 1. Gunnar SS L 2. Adley C S 3. Santa RF S 4. O’Hearn 1B L 5. Kjerstad DH L 6. Westburg 2B R 7. Cowser RF L 8. Mayo 3B R 9. Mullins CF L  
    • The type of relievers that I am hearing being described are guys with electric stuff/power relievers. We have exactly zero of those currently. Our best reliever currently who is able to consistently get K’s is Kimbrel (who doesn’t really possess overpowering stuff anymore). Irvin/Suarez will help the pen (if that is where they wind up eventually) because they can throw more than one inning. However, they don’t possess that kind of dynamic/swing and miss stuff (even as relievers) that you ideally want/need at the back end of your bullpen.
    • Soto is 0-6 off him with 3BB in 9 PA. Good for a .500 OPS
    • Honestly with the heater Vlad is on he's the stronger candidate.  A week ago I would have said otherwise but that's where we are today.
    • Yes that is what happened last year to Adley.  I hope it is not a repeat even though this is someone from the Royals not Rangers where they stuff the ballot boxes and beat him out. Or the Yankees fans who think we are so evil vote for anyone going head to head against us. 
    • And 2 steals. Good enough to put him at .726 OPS and 39 SB through June. Cowser only put up a .795 OPS there. All things considered, EBJ only maybe is slightly under where we hoped he would be. I’d still like to see him finish up in Bowie.  The ASB is June 15-18. Any word on if EBJ has made the team?  I think we could see him promoted afterwards possibly???
    • Both are more of regular season arms. They’re not going to be back end arms in the pen. Suarez wasn’t used like that in his brief stint. He pitches to contact vs hunting for Ks. Both are suited to be regular season SP or bottom half of your pen relievers. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...