Jump to content

Cedric Mullins


boothdos

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Brooks The Great said:

I think this will go down as one of the worst takes on this thread. Maybe of the whole season.

Posters on this board have questioned Cowser every step of the way - including me. I didn't like passing on Lawlar for Cowser on draft night. People have questioned Cowser for lack of power, too many strikeouts (at times, especially at new levels for him), his success from previous levels not translating to a new higher level - Cowser has proven them/me wrong every step of the way. And I think he'll prove you wrong that he doesn't have any power. He clearly does based on his minor league track record.

If you're convinced his power from the minors won't translate to the majors, you're entitled to your opinion. But I think you'll be wrong. He has a great swing, hits both lefties and righties well, and Oriole Park will play to his power as well. And he's been an OBP savant throughout his minor league career, and that's already translated a little bit to the majors despite Hyde not allowing him to get steady playing time when the team has been at full strength. Cowser's been a slow starter for the most part, not unlike Gunnar Henderson. And I think a slow start is what we're seeing now. 

I think Cowser will eventually be this team's leadoff hitter. It might not be until next season, but I'm excited to have him on the roster and I hope Hyde wisens up and stops deferring to Aaron Hicks instead of developing a key piece of this team's future.

Sorry to go off-topic on Ced, but I vehemently disagree with that post.

We're going to find out.  In the meantime we'll just have to disagree.  Since he hasn't come close to barreling one up since he's been here, maybe I should wait for the first liner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Baltimorecuse said:

 You learn to catch fly balls in Little League.  Major League fly balls aren't any different.  

Balls are hit harder and stadiums play completely differently.  It’s fairly well documented OFers often take a little time to adjust.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, yark14 said:

I guess Elias must be dropping Cowser off at the junk yard in the morning, based on the very well-informed and by no means reactionary responses on this thread.

These are the same people that didn’t want him called up in the first place so of course they’re going to gloat while he’s OPSing .500. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ArtVanDelay said:

These are the same people that didn’t want him called up in the first place so of course they’re going to gloat while he’s OPSing .500. 

Let me guess, they are the same people that screamed Rome is burning during our late June mini-slump?

Edited by yark14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ArtVanDelay said:

These are the same people that didn’t want him called up in the first place so of course they’re going to gloat while he’s OPSing .500. 

Bull.  I thought the people calling for  Cowser to replace Urias were out of their minds.

I didn't care if they called up Cowser.  What could be worse than McKenna?  I hoped Cowser would come out blazing like Willie McCovey all those years ago.  My beef with the "Cowser is the Messiah" crowd  is their dependence on minor league stats.  

Edited by Baltimorecuse
grammer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Baltimorecuse said:

Bull.  I thought the people calling for  Cowser to replace Urias were out of their minds.

I didn't care if they called up Cowser.  What could be worse than McKenna?  I hoped Cowser would come out blazing like Willie McCovey all those years ago.  My beef with the "Cowser is the Messiah" crowd  is their dependence on minor league stats.  

I’m fairly certain no one thought Cowser should replace Urias.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, owknows said:

For all the obnoxious grumbing... Cowser's OBP is currently third best on the team.

Sometimes it takes awhile to adjust to the pinnacle of the sport.

He's not hurting this team at all while he figures things out.

This board was waving torches and pitchforks to bring him up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
    • Looks like Baseball Fandom was at the game today!
    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...