Jump to content

Hicks activated, Cowser optioned


MurphDogg

Recommended Posts

I have a guess Cowser won't be back, and he and Kjerstad will both enter 2024 with something like 33-44 days of service.

Its too bad Cowser didn't debut better, and I agree with OP even with the .118 average I would expect him to outplay Hicks the next couple months.

Like the Three Billy Goats Gruff, I think we'll get to try Cowser's bigger, stronger brother in a couple weeks and we'll see what happens.     Mid-August, Cowser and Mayo have shown enough chinks in the armor to be longshots now for an October roster competition all the best Orioles are in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is no surprise and makes sense both for the team and for Cowser’s continued development. 
 

Yes, Hicks may be not good over next few weeks at which point you could bring up Cowser, Kjerstad or Stowers depending on who is hottest. 
 

Or maybe he gets another month burst of production just as he did when he came on- maybe playoff run  fires him up , maybe he wants another contract.. whatever. 
 

But the only moves here were either DFA Hicks, DFA Mateo or option Cowser.  This move retains the most assets and most flexibility in case Ced (nope not going to say it even) 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fine with me. Neither player should be starting many games down the stretch. I trust Hicks to have good AB's, strike out less, and maybe hit the occasional homer. In the meantime, let Cowser work on the holes in his swing starting in AAA. We can always bring Cowser back if Hicks is really bad the next couple of weeks but we can't get Hicks back if we keep Cowser. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the right move for this team at this time.

Even heading into next year these prospects are going to need to kick the door down and force their way into the lineup.  

Mullins/Hays/Santander all return in 24'.  

Cowser didn't force the issue and struggled to make the jump.

Stowers/McKenna/Vavra/Kjerstad -maybe one steps. up

With our infield having plenty to sort through I feel like the outfield is a place we should upgrade heading in 24' via free agency (tough) or trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
    • I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.
    • I was clearly talking about the AL...
    • You mean like how the Os dealt guys like Hays, Stowers and Norby?  Yea, guys who are good depth but guys we can stand to trade are guys I want to trade….and obviously Elias feels similarly. These guys carry value. The level of value depends on the player and you can debate the value of return but yes, you absolutely should trade out of depth and trade guys that perhaps that don’t match your team philosophies.  That’s what teams do.
    • Who knows.  Lots of possibilities. There could be another trade like the Hays trade.  Or maybe you can get a ML ready arm that profiles as a high end reliever. I don’t think that you will get a proven lock down guy but that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone that will end up a big contributor.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...