Jump to content

Angels Series


dystopia

Recommended Posts

Most consecutive series of 2+ games without being swept:

1942-44 Cardinals: 125
1903-05 Giants: 106
2022-pres. Orioles: 84 ** active streak extended w/LAA series
1922-24 Yankees: 83


No team since WW2 has come close to this Os record for not being swept 

 

we have six more regular season series which would take us to 90.  Do not think postseason counted in this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, dystopia said:

White Sox and Royals are up there. Royals somehow have one of the worst farm systems. 

White Sox just moved their Farm System Director into the VP & GM position, apparently out of loyalty to him.  Their farm system was ranked 26th at the start of the 2023 season and only jumped up to 20th in August after a sell-off in July brought in talent from other orgs.

I hold them right up there with the Angels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One advantage of mlb.tv is being able to go back and watch some games or game moments on the opposing team's broadcast, especially to hear some unfiltered, un-Angelosed comments about our club. On Gunnar's backhanded dive and throw in the bottom of the 7th they just said, "Wow..." and mentioned he already put up a few good defensive plays in the series.

At the end of the game, they were lamenting that they lost the lead in the top of the 10th despite Soriano retiring all the batters he faced. "They lost the game with three ground ball outs. Kind of a ridiculous way to lose a game." I reckon it is. But I'll take it! 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, tntoriole said:

Most consecutive series of 2+ games without being swept:

1942-44 Cardinals: 125
1903-05 Giants: 106
2022-pres. Orioles: 84 ** active streak extended w/LAA series
1922-24 Yankees: 83


No team since WW2 has come close to this Os record for not being swept 

 

we have six more regular season series which would take us to 90.  Do not think postseason counted in this. 

As others have pointed out, the Cardinals benefited from a watered-down league due to the war. So we may have to back to the beginning of the last century to find a better streak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Uli2001 said:

As others have pointed out, the Cardinals benefited from a watered-down league due to the war. So we may have to back to the beginning of the last century to find a better streak.

This is true, but all teams benefited  or did not benefit by this, not just  the Cards.  The war caused drafts for MLB players, not   picking and choosing a special way.   If only  the Cards were not drafted, this would be a valid point, but it was not that way.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Uli2001 said:

As others have pointed out, the Cardinals benefited from a watered-down league due to the war. So we may have to back to the beginning of the last century to find a better streak.

As did our ancestors, the Browns who won their only title during that era. Still, quality of opposition varies for lots of reasons over the last 120 years and records by tradition are recorded and recognized nonetheless. 
I mean consider the AL Central “champion” lol 

 

But this record has no parallel in MLB my lifetime since late 50s .. a remarkable achievement!!  

Edited by tntoriole
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...